generally viewed as the same as a guilty plea in open court. There are several ways a confession can be deemed unconstitutional. For example‚ from the previous sections we learned about the exclusionary rule. Which states that any evidence obtained in violation of the fourth amendment is inadmissible in court. In addition to that comes forth the “Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine” which states not only is illegally obtained evidence excluded from court‚ this is to include evidence that is derived from
Premium Law Jury Criminal law
Discretion refers to the authority granted to a police officer that allows him to decide how best to deal with a certain situation. This is aimed at increasing the flexibility of the justice system as punishment may not always be the appropriate mode of dealing with crimes. Discretion may empower a police officer to overlook a minor offense giving the offender a warning. Police discretion is a very important aspect in matters concerning criminal justice. There has been a constant dilemma between
Premium Police Law Criminal law
Justices of the United States Supreme Court are strategic actors who strive to secure policy outcomes as close to their preferred outcome as possible. Accomplishing this sometimes requires justices to not always pursue their true policy preferences and sometimes it requires justices to ignore legal and policy questions. In this essay‚ I will analyze how justices were strategic in a few landmark supreme court cases. The supreme court case Marbury v. Madison is a perfect example of justices being
Premium Supreme Court of the United States
casenotes represent a range of approaches to last year’s case. The Journal cannot speak to how these casenotes were scored by any other law journal. WARNING: These casenotes may contain errors. They have not been checked for conformity to the Bluebook‚ and DLJ does not vouch for the formatting of the citations.
Premium United States Jury Appeal
Today’s society has been largely impacted from cases years ago‚ these cases changed many peoples’ lives. Before there was equality‚ there were arguments almost everyday regarding segregation and racism. To emphasize‚ some disagreements had to be settled by the Supreme Court‚ and the ruling made still have a lasting effect today. The Supreme Court has made many ruling effecting civil rights: Plessy vs. Ferguson‚ Brown vs. Board of Education‚ and Loving vs. Virginia. In Plessy vs. Ferguson‚ the Court’s
Premium African American Black people Race
In modern day society‚ it is hard to predict police discretion due to the different levels of crimes. Crime is constantly evolving‚ and the rules and guidelines are not always enforcing properly. Therefore this creates a loop whole. A loop whole of this magnitude makes all those within the surrounding communities subject to being criminally exposed to mishaps. “The importance of discretion implemented by the police officers is having the ability to execute judgment opposed to following these set
Premium Police Crime Constable
due to drug related crimes. The need to address this growing problem led to the drug court movement and the creation of drug courts. Drug courts are special courts that treat offenders with a history of substance abuse addictions by providing supervised treatments and sanctions when needed. This paper will discuss the establishment and goals of drug courts. It will also discuss the success or failures of drug courts in California‚ Florida‚ and D.C. Early efforts to meet the nation’s growing drug problem
Premium
Aristotle‚ he was born in 384 BCE at Stagirus‚ a Greek colony that is now extinct near the seaport on the coast of Thrace. He was the son of Phaestis and Nichomachus‚ who was a court physician to the King Amyntas of Macedonia. Many people claim this is where Aristotle got influenced to become part of the Macedamian Court system‚ although is has not yet been proving plenty of experts agree this is where it all began. While he was around the age of 7 his father and mother died and he became under the
Premium Aristotle
the debt and their basis. Issues:1) How should the tax court deal with the transfer of non-recourse mortgage debt in property dispositions when the fair market value of the property is less than the property’s basis?
Premium Tax Taxation in the United States Taxation
children but then his attorney announced that Federline asked to cancel the court appearance without further explanation was given. Spears left the rehabilitation centre on March 20 according to her manager‚ who said she was released after as the legal battle over the custody of their children continued‚ successfully completing their program. In September 2007‚ the official findings in Spears custody battle were announced by the court. She ordered to undergo random drug and alcohol tests and to attend parenting
Premium