PRECIS #1: Nathan Barber Santa Margarita Catholic HS 1st Period-John Braithwaite-Instructor Were the Puritans Puritanical? By Carl Degler‚ Stanford University THESIS: Carl Degler‚ in this provocative article‚ takes issue with the popular notion that the Puritans were people who had “the haunting fear that someone‚ somewhere‚ may be happy” as advocated by Mencken‚ Macaulay‚ & Heffner who got it all wrong! They are not repressed sex misfits and bigots‚ but rather‚ keepers of the Victorian
Premium Slavery Andrew Carnegie
helped America become. They have also been called "robber barons" because they built their great wealth by abusing the system‚ abusing their employees‚ and destroying their competitors to satisfy their own needs. These "kings" off industry displayed characteristics of both industrial statesmen and robber barons. It is therefore justified to characterize the industrial leaders of the nineteenth century as both industrial statesmen and robber barons. Because they used vicious tactics to destroy competition
Premium Industrial Revolution Capitalism
Robber Baron: 1: an American capitalist of the latter part of the 19th century who became wealthy through exploitation (as of natural resources‚ governmental influence‚ or low wage scales) Jay‚ born Jayson Gould to John Burr and Mary Gould as a small‚ feeble baby‚ was the robber baron’s robber baron. He was the king manipulator of Wall Street. Although he was not the only snake on Wall Street‚ he was the most calculating‚ manipulative‚ and strategizing of them all. December 6‚ 1892‚ surrounded
Premium Robber barons Family
industrial and economic development between 1875 and 1900‚ the intention with which they did so has been a topic of dispute. While some historians described these capitalists as “captains of industry” others believed they were better described as “robber barons”. Of these two characterizations‚ the title of “robber barons” was more appropriate as most of them gained their wealth and power by fraudulent means — defying government regulation‚ using ruthless business schemes
Premium United States Industrial Revolution American Civil War
They created so many job opportunities‚ built industries that benefited the whole country and gave away much of their hard earned money. Capitalists of the nineteenth century may have been considered robber barons but they were for the most part captains of industry. The American Industrial Revolution fundamentally changed politics‚ society‚ and the economy. Factory workers and consumerism had changed immensely in the Gilded Age; about 400‚000 patents were made between 1875 and 1900 which signifies
Premium Andrew Carnegie Robber barons Cornelius Vanderbilt
The three men‚ John D. Rockefeller‚ Andrew Carnegie‚ and J.P. Morgan‚ were seen as robber barons BUT they were also seen as industrial statesmen. Robber baron was a term given to the rich who would pretty much do anything for money whether that meant the jeopardy of workers’ lives and crooked business practices. John D. Rockefeller started a standard oil company and was the first American billionaire. John R. was considered a robber baron mainly because he used his insight of business to ruthlessly
Premium John D. Rockefeller Robber barons Andrew Carnegie
monopolies that controlled entire industries. Thus‚ business leaders soon dominated not only the US‚ but the whole world‚ as well. Unchecked power at the turn of the century had led to a corrupt capitalist system with huge industrial monarchs that left entire generations of immigrants broken and drained of individuality and spirit. Business leaders were very greedy and valued profit more than anything. Even safety wasn’t barely considered while the robber barons plotted ways to get rich and control
Premium Ford Motor Company United States
James Wong Robber Baron ’s are Captains of Industry who are looked down upon for succeeding at the expense of others and at the expense of moral integrity. To firmly attach a label to any given person or people is difficult because the distinction between a robber baron and a captain of industry alternates with the point of view from which you hold. Leland Stanford and the Big Four of the Central Pacific Railroad are perfect examples of how there are contrasting arguments about their proper titles
Free Robber barons First Transcontinental Railroad
others‚ or dying for his country? Andrew Carnegie was no Ulysses Grant but he was also not Vanderbilt‚ Carnegie gave back to his country with the riches he earned. We cannot look upon Carnegie as being the child with the silver spoon in his mouth growing up. He was poor growing up and was business savvy which is how he became rich. We should not punish him for using his knowledge to become successful but we should look at what he did with the money. Andrew Carnegie was a hero‚ he not only brought
Premium United States Ulysses S. Grant Invention
The United States followed the example set by many European countries‚ and used industry to catapult the nation’s wealth. The lives of the general public were greatly impacted by this shift from agriculture to industry and this time became known as the Gilded Age. Railroads‚ steel mills‚ factories‚ and other forms of industry dominated the economy. One of very few men to accept this change in the U.S.‚ Andrew Carnegie overcame his humble underpinnings and became the owner of one of the largest steel
Premium Distribution of wealth Wealth Andrew Carnegie