1. The fact of the case Respondent (Schmidt) was a consulting engineer for the appellant company (Kepong Prospecting Ltd). The appellant company was the holders of certain mining leases in respect of deposits of iron ore. They did not work these deposits themselves but allowed them to be worked on tribute by another company named Kepong Mines Ltd. Their business in practice would seem to be confined to collecting the tribute and distributing it to their shareholders after making arrangements
Premium Civil procedure Money Appeal
i. How does the relationship between these two characters develop across the course of the novel? ii. Where were the turning points in this relationship? What accounted for these changes? iii. How does the relationship between these two characters contribute to the story in terms of plot‚ theme‚ or the writer’s craft? The relationship between the two characters started off with Daisy predominantly in control as the two of them starting a detective society with Daisy as the chairman and Hazel as
Premium Interpersonal relationship Interpersonal relationship The Usual Suspects
it always wrong for anyone to believe anything on insufficient evidence.” (Pojman/Rea 498) This short essay of comparing thoughts and beliefs will compare how Euthyphro by Plato‚ shows the importance of belief in comparison to that of W. K. Clifford in “The Ethics of Belief.” Furthermore‚ it is important to see how the text on Euthyphro’s conversation with Socrates‚ by Plato‚ truly shows that belief is invalid without proper evidence to justify it. Belief is described as a feeling of being sure
Premium Plato Critical thinking Euthyphro
at the right time. The aims of this essay is to evaluate whether Gladwell’s argument are true‚ and how reliable are the evidence used to support his arguments. I will critically evaluate‚ and identify the type of evidence used by the author‚ which sometime tend to be unconvincing. This essay is organised into two great section. Each section present arguments and evidence used by Gladwell ‚ an evaluation of these ‚ and finally other examples and comparisons. The first section will argue about
Free Argument Critical thinking Evidence
performance and carrying out their assessment at convenient times for the candidate in their place of work. Carrying assessments can be changed to suit the candidate‚ for example if the candidate changes shift or job role. There are many types of evidence that can be used‚ such as photographs (if allowed by the company)‚ work product‚ witness testimonies and questioning. Also including APL (Accredited Prior Learning) which can be used to cover mainly knowledge induction to company procedures‚ polices
Premium Assessment Evidence
arrested for the double homicide. Evidence pointing towards Simpson’s guilt was powerful and plentiful. This included Nicole’s blood found on Simpson’s sock‚ Simpson’s hair on Goldman’s body‚ and a pair of bloody gloves‚ one found near the victims and the other in Simpson’s home. The biggest factor in determining the outcome of Simpson’s trial turned out to be the bloody glove found at the crime scene‚ which did not fit Simpson’s left hand. Despite all the evidence‚ Simpson’s legal team was able to
Premium Nicole Brown Simpson Legal burden of proof Law
stopped reporting to work and therefore cannot be terminated LA- Francisco failed to present sufficient evidence to prove regulat employment such as company ID‚ SSS mem and not considered as an employee. Ten and End could not be dismissed since there was no overt act of dismissal committed by the respondents NLRC- reversed the ruling and premised the conclusion on the additional pieces of evidence belatedly submitted by petitioners CA- held that there was an illegal dismissal on the part of tenazas
Premium Legal terms Employment Security
possess: 1. Tolerance of uncertainty 2. Curiosity 3. Objectivity 4. critical-mindedness 5. open-mindedness 6. Willingness to change opinions 7. Risk-taking 8. Intellectual honesty 9. Humility 10. Respect for evidence How each attitude helps scientists achieve their goal: 1. By tolerating uncertainty‚ the scientist accepts that there is always some uncertainty of any experiment or findings. He also strives for greater and greater certainty to prove his uncertainty
Premium Risk Mathematics Uncertainty
daughter was a great part in my life‚ and although my words may mean nothing to you‚ I hope that you will hear the truth in my version of events and understand that I‚ too‚ am a victim in this tragedy. I would first like to discuss the only “hard evidence” that the state has offered in convicting me of this murder; the outgoing phone call on my cell phone to Nisha Inez Butler on the day Hae was murdered. The state offered that my motive for killing your daughter was due to my rage after our final
Premium Murder Evidence Legal burden of proof
will discuss is known to some as the abominable snowman‚ sasquatch‚ and Yeti. Known to most as bigfoot‚ this creature is usually described as 7 feet tall‚ bipedal‚ and ape-like. The reason why bigfoot is a controversy is because of the lack of hard evidence proving his existence. There have been many “sightings”‚ but the only credible explanation for bigfoot’s existence is a creature known to scientists as‚ Gigantopithecus. “A gigantic ape‚ measuring about 10 feet tall and weighing up to 1‚200 pounds
Premium Cryptozoology Evidence