When it comes to the topic of animal testing‚ most of us will readily agree that it is a debatable topic. Where this argument usually ends‚ however‚ is on the conversation if animal testing is necessary. Whereas some are convinced that using animals for testing has contributed to many lifesaving cures and treatments‚ others maintain that these animals are very different from humans and‚ therefore‚ make poor test subjects. My own view is these animals have produced many treatments‚ but not outcomes
Premium Animal testing Animal rights Testing cosmetics on animals
Every year‚ millions of animals suffer through painful and unnecessary tests. Animals in laboratories all over the world live lives of deprivation‚ pain‚ isolation‚ and torture. Even though vast studies show that animal experimentation often lacks validity‚ leading to harmful human reactions‚ we still continue to use this method of experimentation‚ while many other less-expensive and more beneficial alternatives exist. Going beyond the issue of animal experimentation being morally wrong‚ this form
Premium Animal testing Animal rights Animal Liberation Front
Animal Rights- Ban Testing Ally Torres English 10 April 25‚ 2012 Mr. Bannon Animals are unique creatures placed all around the world‚ each with their own genuine‚ exotic‚ and weird personalities. Unfortunately‚ every year‚ “scientists” use them to test potentially dangerous products that most people use in our everyday lives. Although scientists claim that there is no other way to test them‚ and that their work ethics are a necessity to keep the society safe‚ they are wrong. There are many
Premium Animal testing The Animals Animal rights
Animal Testing Since 2002‚ over 1 million animals that the USDA collects numbers on‚ which includes dogs‚ cats‚ sheep‚ hamsters‚ guinea pigs‚ and primates‚ have been tested on. Since then‚ that number has increased to approximately 1.4 million. This excludes all rats and hamsters used in testing‚ which normally make up 90% of testing. This percentage‚ however‚ remains only as an estimate because US laws do not require scientists to record how many rats‚ birds‚ and mice are used. Cages for theses
Premium Animal rights Pain Suffering
Cosmetic testing on animals The first test was designed in the 1920’s and it was developed to test the toxicity of certain products. Testing cosmetics on animals in the United States is very common. About a thousand mice‚ guinea pigs‚ rats and rabbits undergo pain or die each year. Animal testing is different in some circumstances. Animal testing involves the inability to consent. It involves pain‚ suffering‚ and discomfort under certain situations. Researchers aren’t fully able to block out the
Premium Animal testing Animal rights Testing cosmetics on animals
<b>Specific Purpose</b> To persuade my audience that animal testing is wrong and how other safer alternatives should be taken. <br> <br><b>Central Idea</b> By going the extra mile in using safer alternatives when experimenting with animals will not only prevent conflicts from pro-life activists‚ it will minimize lawsuits and morals will be preserved. <br> <br><b>Introduction</b> <br>I. Okay I got a riddle I made up for the class. <br>A. What was once cute and furry but becomes a bloody rotted
Premium Animal rights Human Animal testing
Animal experiments have been used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of many other products. Some people think that these experiments should be banned‚ while others argue that they provide benefits for humans. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. The animal experiments make a big difference in the medical development to a large extent. However‚ some people believe that animal experiments are cruel and should be prohibited. In this essay‚ I will examine both ideas
Premium Medicine Animal rights Suffering
Animal testing is a practice that helps new discoveries in the fields of science and health sciences. However‚ it has been laid on top of a hidden‚ dark torture chamber. The reckless torture of animals involved is abysmal. The theme of the essay is to point out that animals and humans share the same fate during torture and humans should start treating animals with the respect they deserve and give them the freedom they are destined to enjoy. Even though animal testing has so many advantages‚ this
Premium Animal testing Animal rights Testing cosmetics on animals
PETA explains that animal testing wastes lives‚ both human and animal. They also focus on the viewpoints of both sides of animal testing throughout the piece. While each viewpoint has some accuracy within the article a persuasive technique for the reader is not clear. Analysis Response: PETA‚ or people for the ethical treatment of animals‚ begins their argument with many facts from studies proving that they have credible information. Unfortunately‚ the information they present throughout the
Premium Animal testing Animal rights Testing cosmetics on animals
Animal Testing for Pharmaceuticals: Ethical or Unethical? People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) is a foundation that has been described as “by far the most successful radical organization in America” (Carlton). The keyword “radical” is a perfect adjective used to describe PETA. According to the co-founder and president‚ Ingrid Newkirk‚ they pursue total animal liberation from serving humans which clearly means no meat and dairy‚ but also means no medical research using animals. PETA
Free Animal rights Animal testing Animal Liberation Front