to outline the Ontological Argument‚ proposed by Anselm of Canterbury‚ to prove the existence of God (in particular the Christian God). It also discusses Gaunilo’s objection to the ontological argument with the use of the “Lost Island” analogy. And finally offers an opinion as to whether or not Gaunilo’s objection successfully refutes Anselm’s argument. Anselm’s ontological argument‚ sourced from the “Proslogium” (with himself as the author)‚ is a highly controversial argument that aims to prove
Premium Ontological argument Ontology
show that Anselm’s ontological argument is sound and his conclusion logically follows from his premises. I will consider an objection towards Anselm’s definition of God and show that it is unconvincing and flawed. The objection against Anselm’s ontological argument that I will consider will be one brought up by a contemporary of Anselm‚ Gauinilo. His objection was that if you were to take Anselm’s logic of existence then you can infer anything into existence (essentially parallel arguments). I shall
Premium Ontology Metaphysics Existence
Anselm’s argument did lead to objections as most do. The first was that of a Monk Named Gaunilo‚ who argued against Anselm’s ontological Argument with the use of the concept of a perfect island. Gaunilo argued that concept of a perfect island does not prove that the existence of an island. In this case that perfection does not imply ‘existence’. Gaunilo claims that if the word God was replaced with the words perfect island‚ then Anselm’s ontological argument would not conclude that the perfect island
Premium Existence God Metaphysics
and Aquinas have written about God’s existence in their work. In this paper‚ I will discuss Anselm’s ontological argument which begins with the definition of God and ends with the existence of God. I will first introduce the premises and the conclusion of the argument‚ which is that “God is the greatest” and “Therefore He Exists”. Secondly‚ I will focus on the strengths and weaknesses of the argument‚
Premium Metaphysics Ontology Existence
truly say that I have found Saint Anselm Ontological Argument to be very interesting and I was so fascinated by his life and the stand he took to prove his reasoning in his argument. In fact Anselm’s most famous work is his attempt to prove the existence of God in the Proslogion (or discourse) known now as the “Ontological argument.” I also found it very interesting that Mr. Immanuel Kant‚ another great philosopher in my view said the ontological argument attempts to show that which we can conceive
Premium God Christianity Jesus
had tackled the different arguments that were made by different philosophers which concerns about the existence of God. Its aim is to deepen our understanding of certain religious concepts and beliefs as it tries to critically analyze and examine through the method of philosophical inquiry. Philosophy of religion does not simply study what we believe but more significantly‚ subject these beliefs to rigorous rational criticism and assessment. Anselm’s Ontological Argument is an ideal of a purely analytic
Premium Ontology Metaphysics Existence
In philosophy‚ an ontological argument is a kind of argument that establishes the existence of some entity. In the case of Anselm‚ he argues in favor of God’s existence. In this paper‚ I will discuss relevant information necessary to understand Anselm’s reasoning. Then I will break down Anselm’s argument. Finally‚ I will present Galindo’s Perfect Island Objection and explain why his criticisms are unfounded. Before examining Anselm’s argument‚ it is necessary to understand the concepts underlying
Premium Ontology Existence Metaphysics
been interesting and some have been very confusing. One of our topics that I’ve found interesting and I enjoyed was when talked about the weaknesses and strengths of Gaunilo’s and Kant’s and their ontological arguments. Anselm’s ontological argument defined God as being “as which no other greater can conceive.” Ontological arguments tend to start with a priori theory about the organization of the universe. If the organization falls under being true there will be evidence of the existence of God‚
Premium Ontology Existence Ontological argument
Anselm considers that‚ raising against Ontological Argument from side of creature(human) that was created by creator(God) is absurd‚ however personally I am not the only one who disagrees with this statement. First of all I will summarize Anselm’s Ontological Argument‚ than I will go on to object to his argument through Immanuel Kant’s argument and defend Immanuel Kant’s argument threw the Anselm’s and Rowe’s arguments. The formation of Ontological Argument started in eleventh century by St.Anselm
Premium Ontology Metaphysics Existence
Assuming that one of the explorers who found the tended plot of land is a theist and one is an atheist; the theist uses Anselm’s ontological argument that‚ “[…] than which nothing greater can be conceived” (Palmer‚ 158) or in basic there is nothing greater or more perfect than God. The explorers describe the plot of land as tended to‚ so they set up multiple obstacles to catch and observe what being is taking care of the land. The explorer who is a presumed to be a theist states‚ “But there is a
Premium Metaphysics Ontology God