thoroughly argue against it‚ I still disagree with the Ontological Argument with the point that someone who completely understand God can still
Premium Existence God Existence of God
have faith in God‚ but as to whether or not his existence can be proven lays the argument between theists and atheists. The philosophers discussed believe that faith and reason must be coherent with each other. St. Anselm with the Ontological argument‚ and Paley’s Teleological argument‚ all articulate proofs that provide an argument for God’s existence. In juxtaposition‚ Hume offers arguments against
Premium Metaphysics God Ontology
Outline Descartes’ Ontological Argument and explain the key objections that may be used against it. Descartes took the Ontological Argument as presented by Anselm and developed it in a different form. Descartes saw the argument in terms of necessary existence. For Descartes‚ the idea of God necessarily entails his existence. He established that our thoughts are evidence of our own existence (‘I think therefore I am’)‚ and so wanted to see what else he could prove exists. He used the example of a
Premium Ontology Metaphysics Logic
AO1: Explain Anselms Ontological argument. Anselm wanted to prove the existence of God‚ so he proposed the ontological argument. The ontological argument is deductive‚ and uses a priori reasoning. This means that it starts with a statement that is known to be true solely through definition (God is the greatest conceivable being) and develops the implications of this statement in order to reach a reasonable conclusion. The deductive reasoning allows him to simply showing what the definition means
Premium Ontology Existence Metaphysics
The Australian philosopher Douglas Gasking perhaps best articulates what I am trying to say in his formulation of the ontological argument. He argued God’s creation of the universe is the greatest achievement imaginable. Just how great this achievement is depends on the quality and degree that the Creator was impaired. The greater the impairment the greater achievement the creation
Premium God Religion Christianity
Chambers argue that the devil premises and corollary is more logical and compelling in comparison to the Gaunilo’s challenge since it withstands and copes with the difficulties that are likely to overcome Gaunilo’s claims and parody. He further recommends the no devil corollary as a stronger and more powerful challenge as it underlines the no devil parody which threats and challenges Anselm’s argument and satire at its very own basis and foundations (Garrett
Premium God Existence Morality
basis for the human thought. It was the first ever real science‚ and it served as a springboard for many of the fields studied today‚ such as psychology and traditional science. One of the most primitive and early arguments presented in psychology was the ontological argument: the argument for the existence of a God (Pojman). People wanted to be able to explain the world around them‚ and more importantly people wanted to have direction in their life. The desire for an all powerful being stems from
Premium Metaphysics Philosophy Plato
St Anselm was impressed by Gaunilo’s objections and wrote a careful reply to him. The crux of Anselm’s response was that his argument only applies to the greatest possible being: it is part of the essence of the greatest possible being that it must exist. It is not part of the essence of the greatest possible island that it must exist (islands can exist or not)‚ but it is part of the greatest possible being that it must exist. So whether an atheist thinks Gaunilo’s Lost Island objection is decisive
Premium Ontological argument Ontological argument Ontology
later his ontological argument to not only state the prerequisite criteria to be justifiably certain of something‚ but also prove the existence of God. Descartes Ontological argument is seemed as a must to fix any circularity problems in his rule of perceptions‚ as well as‚ in his belief proof the existence of an all powerful being. In this paper I will first explore the rule of clear and distinct perception and its charge of circularity. Then I will go through Descartes Ontological arguments and see
Premium Metaphysics Ontology Epistemology
Theology – Mr. Mayemba Kate Foote 12Ben - Explain the objections of Gaunilo and Kant to the ontological argument. Gaunilo and Kant both had objections to Anselms ontological argument. While Kant argued that the problem in the argument lay in it’s claim that existence is it’s predicate‚ Gaunilo argued that there must be something wrong with it even though he could not identify a specific fault. Kant argued that existence cannot be a predicate because it does
Premium Metaphysics Ontology Existence