Compared to the Spanish‚ the English saw colonization as a vital source for the expansion of their landholding. More fertile land to grow their crops meant more resources‚ which would satisfy England’s growing population. The Spanish were looking to conquer North America for not only the land but also for the native people to be trafficked for slavery. Rather than a talk of complete conquest‚ planting was a form of settlement for the English showing that agricultural pursuits were their goal. Therefore
Premium United States Native Americans in the United States Colonialism
Susan M. V. New York Law School‚ No. 129‚ Court of Appeals of New York‚ 76 N.Y. 2d 241; 556 N.E. 2d 1104; 557 N.Y.S. 2d 297; 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 1413‚ April 26 1990‚ Argued‚ June 14‚ 1990‚ Decided Facts: Petitioner law student was placed on academic probation after her first year of law school. A year later‚ having failed to maintain a minimum cumulative average as required by respondent law school’s rules‚ she was dismissed after a hearing of respondent’s academic status committee. She sought reinstatement
Premium Appeal Law Appellate court
the United States Supreme Court. List those three courts in order‚ beginning with the court that has the most authority and ending with the court that has the least amount of authority. United States Supreme Court‚ Court of Criminal Appeals‚ Texas Court of Appeals‚ Fifth District 5. Provide the citation for the United States Supreme Court’s decision in this case. Texas v. Johnson‚ 491 U.S. 397 (1989). 6. What effect did the United States Supreme Court’s decision have on the Texas statute
Premium United States First Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES (COS) DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCES AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (PSPA). PA 707: ADMINISTRATIVE AND LABOUR LAWS PRESENTATION TOPIC: JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION. SUB TOPIC: ULTRA VIRES DOCTRINE. SUPERVISOR: PROF.MOHAMMED A. BAKARI STUDENT NAME: SWALEHE‚ Amani (MPA) This presentation covers the “judicial review of administrative action: The Ultra Vires Doctrine” Judicial Review is essentially a high
Premium Administrative law Law Appeal
Harpers Trading (M) Sdn Bhd - vs - National Union of Commercial Workers |Coram |29 DECEMBER 1990 | |ABDUL HAMID OMAR LP | | |CT GUNN SCJ | | |JEMURI SERJAN SCJ
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Supreme court Court
Always.’’ against them by adding the attacking shark plus the phrase ’’Predator of the Poor’’‚ using pathos (emotional) appeal through fear‚ and ethos (ethical) appeal. If the viewer does not know about Wal-Mart and how they have the lowest prices on merchandise in comparison to everyone else anywhere‚ then they would have a hard time understanding the logos (logical) appeal. The purpose of this ad and argument is to show anyone and everyone (since Wal-Mart is a place for anyone to go and buy
Premium Rhetoric Logos Creator deity
British Commonwealth tradition. The hiearchy system of jamaica is divided into four sections starting from the lowest to the highest. Petty Session is the lowest court in the hiearchial system‚ they are prosecuted over by a justice of the peace. Appeals from this court goes to the circuit court in the parish where the petty session is located‚ the cases can be persecuted by the clerk of the court and a police officer. They hear minor matters such as indecent language‚ threatening language‚ applications
Premium Court Judge Appellate court
disconnected her electricity services due to lack of payment. 2. The case was decided by the Supreme Court. It got to that court because the District Court granted Metropolitan’s motion to dismiss the petitioner’s complaint. There was then an appeal and the Court of Appeals granted certiorari which sent the case up to the Supreme Court for review. 3. The courts below decided that the termination of electric services did not constitute state action and hence was not subject to judicial scrutiny under the
Premium United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
African Consolidated Resources Plc and Others Minister of Mines and Mining Development and Others (HC 6411/07) [2010] ZWHHC 86 (6 September 2010) Download original filesPDF format RTF format | | Bookmark/share this page | [Context] [Hide Context] HH 205-2010 HC 6411/07 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE HELD AT HARARE In the matter between:- AFRICAN CONSOLIDATED RESOURCES Plc and DASHALOO INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD and POSSESSION INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD and HEAVY STUFF INVESTMENTS
Premium Appeal Court Judge
Elliott v C [1983] The case involves the mens rea of recklessness. The defendant was a girl of 14 years old who had low intelligence. She lit a fire in a shed. The magistrates applied the test laid down in R v Caldwell but inferred that in his reference to "an obvious risk" Lord Diplock had meant a risk which was obvious to the particular defendant. They acquitted the defendant because they found that the defendant had given no thought at the time to the possibility of there being a risk that
Premium Crime Law Criminal law