1. Indian Airlines Corporation vs Sm. Madhuri Chowdhuri And Ors. on 27 May‚ 1964 The suit arose out of an unfortunate and tragic air crash at Nagpur when a Dakota air plane VT-CHF crashed soon after it started flying from Nagpur to Madras. All the passengers and the crew were killed and the only person who escaped with severe injuries and burns was the Pilot‚ Desmond Arthur James Cartner. This accident took place on the 12th December‚ 1953 at about 3-25 a.m. In that Aircraft travelled one Sunil
Premium Indira Gandhi International Airport Star Alliance Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport
Relevant Facts and Relevant Issues ’Appellants were employed by the respondent as baggage handler at Sydney Airport‚ they were dismissed from their employment’ for stealing funds. ’Appellants sought an order for imposition of penalty and payment of penalty to them.’ Trial judge found out respondents in ’terminating the appellants’ employment was not harsh‚ unjust or unreasonable and dismissed the claims.’ ’The Full Court held that it was contrary however appellants were still not entitled to damages
Premium Contract Termination of employment Employment
FAMOUS CASES ON NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT* LIABILITY OF PAYING BANKER WHEN CUSTOMER’S SIGNATURE ON CHEQUE IS FORGED 1. When the customer’s signature on the cheque is forged there is no mandate to the bank to pay. As such a banker is not entitled to debit the customer’s account on such forged cheque. In Canara Bank vs. Canara Sales Corporation and Others [(1987)2 Supreme Court Cases 666] the company has a current account with the bank which was operated by the Company’s Managing Director
Premium Cheque Bank Credit card
Case Name‚ Citation‚ and Court: TRACO‚ INC.‚ A THREE RIVERS ALUMINUM COMPANY‚ Appellant v. ARROW GLASS CO.‚ INC.‚ Appellee Appeal No. 04-90-00382-CV COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS‚ Fourth District‚ San Antonio Key Facts Traco Inc is an aluminum company that supplies pre-engineered aluminum and glass sliding doors and windows. Arrow Glass Company is a subcontractor who initially brought suit against Traco on the theories of promissory estoppel and negligence for Traco’s failure to supply aluminum
Premium Law Jury Appeal
The Defence of Provocation Provocation is a defence which reduces the offence of murder to manslaughter. Even though there may be an intent to kill it can be deemed that‚ in some circumstances‚ it is not appropriate to be classified as murder. It is not saying the killing is justified or excused. What it is saying is that the circumstances‚ the response (which resulted in the killing) is within the normal range of behaviour of what can be expected of the ordinary person and that it represents
Premium Criminal law Murder Manslaughter
85‚ 3rd SEM‚ B.A. LL.B. (HONS)‚ RMLNLU 1|Page CRIMINAL LAW-I CASE ANALYSIS TITLE LALLAN RAI AND OTHERS……………………………………………..….APPELLANTS Versus STATE OF BIHAR………………………………………………....................RESPONDENT CITATION (2003) 1 SCC 268: AIR2003SC333: 2003CriLJ465 BENCH/ CORAM Justice U. C. Banerjee and Justice B. N. Agrawal. COUNSELS For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: P.S. Mishra‚ Senior Advocate; S. Chandra Shekhar; T. Swarupa Reddy; Vishnu Sharma; Upendra Mishra; Tathagat Harsh
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Supreme court Criminal law
MEMORANDUM ON BEHALF OF APPELLANTS 4TH ANNUAL NALSAR-JUSTICE BODH RAJ SAWHNY MEMORIAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION NALSAR‚ HYDERABAD IN THE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CASES CONCERNING “ARTICLE 74 AND ARTICLE 61 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA” Civil Appeal No. 244 of 2022(Arising out of SLP (Civ.) No. 3033 of 2022) With Special Reference No. 1 of 2022 LENIN BUDDI AND ORS. Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. WITH IN RE: IMPEACHMENT OF PRESIDENT UNDER
Premium Constitution of India India United States Constitution
TUTORIAL 2 1. Ali and Abu were neighbours. Ali had to go to Singapore for a business seminar. Before he left‚ he told Abu “Please look after my house”. After two weeks of being away‚ Ali’s house caught fire and Abu could only save a briefcase containing RM30‚000. When Ali returned home‚ he thanked Abu for saving his briefcase and promised he would pay Abu RM2‚000 for what he had done. Later‚ Ali refused to pay what he had promised. Advise Abu. Referring to section 2(d) of Contracts Act1950
Premium Contract Consideration
Resources Ltd to build a ski resort on sacred Qat’muk land in the 1990s. No Indigenous treaty included this area and it was characterized as Crown land. A two-decade consultation process with the Ktunaxa Nation led to the late position adoption by the appellant stating the ski resort would drive out the Grizzly Bear Spirit and irrevocably impair their religious beliefs and practices. This position was contrary to resort construction. The Minister believed he reasonably consulted with the Aboriginal people
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States World War II
Title: Right to Know & Right to Privacy 1. Constitutional and Civil Rights A constitutional right is a right granted by a country’s constitution‚ and cannot be legally denied by the government. Civil rights are the protections and privileges of personal liberty given to all citizens by law. Examples of civil rights and liberties include the right to get redress if injured by another‚ the right to privacy‚ the right of peaceful protest‚ the right to a fair investigation and trial if suspected of
Premium Law Human rights Supreme Court of the United States