published Schedule B rates based on the calculation that stone would be available within 26 chains. The appellant inspected the site and found that there was stone available for construction within 26 chains. Satisfied he submitted a tender at 13% below the rates given in Schedule B on 30th September‚ 1946. Finally the tender was accepted and contract signed on 20th November‚ 1946. However when the appellant tried to take stone from the specific area‚ he was stopped by Cantonment authorities. Furthermore
Premium Contract
SUPERVISOR: PROF.MOHAMMED A. BAKARI STUDENT NAME: SWALEHE‚ Amani (MPA) This presentation covers the “judicial review of administrative action: The Ultra Vires Doctrine” Judicial Review is essentially a high court procedure by which an appellant request or ask the court to review the legality of the decision of the government ministers‚ departments‚ local authorities and any other public bodies. The court may examine the decision to ensure that the public body made that decision had the
Premium Administrative law Law Appeal
Case Title: Regina v. G and another (Appellants) (On Appeal form the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)) Citation: [2003] UKHL 50 Procedural History (PH): The appellants were charged on 22nd August 2000; without lawful excuse damaged by fire; commercial premises and being reckless as to whether such property would be damaged. The appellants stood trial before Judge Maher in March 2001. The appellants’ case at trial was that they expected the fire to extinguish itself on the concrete
Premium Mind Criminal law Mens rea
COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II‚ CITY OF MANILA PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES‚ Plaintif-Appellee‚ -versus- GA. G.R. No. 123456 PEDRO SARMIENTO Y TORDECILLA Accused-Appellant‚ x------------------------------------------x APPELLEE’S BRIEF SUBMITTED BY OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL #234 Palack St‚ GSIS Building‚ Brgy. Vito Cruz‚ Manila‚ Philippines By Dioxenos Barreras Sulit Associate Solicitor
Premium Criminal law Rape Manila
the Negotiable Instruments Act‚ 1881. In the complaint‚ B.S.N.L. alleged that the cheques were issued to it by the Data Access (India) Limited in discharge of a pre-existing liability based on the business transactions between the companies. The appellant herein and respondent No. 2 in the complaint were the Directors of respondent No. 1 Company and they were in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the business of Data Access (India) Limited. The relevant statement in the complaint read: "That
Premium Cheque Legal terms
3. Mr Butters‚ the appellant‚ and Ms Mncora‚ the respondent‚ lived together for nearly 20 years as husband and wife but were never married. Butters was a business owner while Mncora ran their household and raised the children. (para 1) When the relationship ended‚ the respondent claimed half of the appellant’s assets based on the fact that she believed that a tacit universal partnership existed between them. (para 2) 4. Heher JA and Cachalia JA (15) 5. The appellant is appealing the claim
Premium Marriage Law Ontology
THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIACivil Appeal No. 3401 of 1988Decided On: 16.07.1991Appellants:M/s. Burn Standard Company Ltd. and another Vs. Respondent: Union of India and othersHon’ble Judges/Coram: K. N. Singh and Kuldip Singh‚ JJ.Counsels: For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: Shankar Ghosh‚ Naresh Bakshi and K.D. Prasad‚ AdvsFor Respondents/Defendant: Ashok H. Desai‚ P. Parmeshwaran and A. Subba Rao‚ Advs.Subject: ExciseCatch WordsMentioned INActs/Rules/Orders: Central Excises and Salt Act‚ 1944
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Manufacturing Duty
is on the Bill of Exchange act. The definition and several examples of other cases concerning this act are mentioned in the case. The actual case that is mentioned is about the appeal from a decision of Judge Robotham date 18th of June 1980. The appellant‚ an architect‚ sued the bank of Nova Scotia after noticing that the bank paid out a check that is noticeable altered. The architect wants the bank to pay back the 6000 dollars that the bank deducted from their bank account plus interest and other
Premium Appeal Money Credit card
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION‚ PUNJAB SCO NO. 32-33-34‚ SECTOR 17-C‚ CHANDIGARH Mrs. Naveen‚ W/o Late Sh. Shiv Kumar Abrol‚ R/o H. No. 95‚ Shingari Gali Chhota‚ Bazar Qadian‚ Tehsil – Batala‚ Distt. Gurdaspur … Complainant Versus Public Information Officer‚ O/o Senior Superintendent of Police‚ Batala‚ Distt. Gurdaspur. …Respondent Complaint Case no- 2799/2013 ORDER Present : Representative‚ Mr. Aman Abrol‚ for the complainant. Mr. Parkash Singh
Premium Punjab Appeal Punjabi language
224 of the Penal Code minor offence in relation to s. 215 of the Penal Code. Headnote The appellant was convicted of attempting to cause death contrary to s. 215 of the Penal Code. The learned judge held that following some kind of difference the appellant had armed himself with three spears and attacked the complainant. The only question that arose for decision in this appeal was whether the appellant was correctly convicted of attempting to cause the death of the complainant or whether he should
Premium Criminal law Crime