It depend upon the approach of the legal duties of the administrators which were framework in the Corporation Act. The court has noticed that the appellant provide the legal duties approaching the suer and the duties which were performed was not for the benefit of himself although it was not for the benefit of other partner too. It was only for the benefit of the company. It was noticed by the court
Premium
Teddy’s Supplies’ CEO has asked you to advise him on the facts of the case and your opinion of their potential liability. Write a memo to him that states your view of whether the company is exposed to liability on all issues you feel are in play. Include in your memo any laws that apply and any precedent cases either for or against Teddy’s case that impact liability. Include your opinion of the "worst case" of damages the company may have to pay to Virginia. To: Ted More CEO From: Priority: High
Premium Quid pro quo Employment Case law
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL DIVISION ON APPEAL FROM THE CROWN COURT BETWEEN: BILLY Appellant -and- R Respondent __________________________________________ APPELLANT’S SKELETON ARGUMENT __________________________________________
Premium Jury Appeal Law
Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila EN BANC G.R. No. 153690 February 15‚ 2011 DAVID LU‚ Petitioner‚ vs. PATERNO LU YM‚ SR.‚ PATERNO LU YM‚ JR.‚ VICTOR LU YM‚ JOHN LU YM‚ KELLY LU YM‚ and LUDO & LUYM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION‚ Respondents. x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x G.R. No. 157381 PATERNO LU YM‚ SR.‚ PATERNO LU YM‚ JR.‚ VICTOR LU YM‚ JOHN LU YM‚ KELLY LU YM‚ and LUDO & LUYM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION‚ Petitioners‚ vs. DAVID LU‚ Respondent. x - - - - -
Premium Appellate court Trial court Supreme court
Segregation Research Paper: Berea College v. Commonwealth Caption of Case and Citation Berea College v. Commonwealth‚ 94 S.W. 623; 1906 Ky. LEXIS 139 Statement of Facts This case took place during 1906 when the appellant college wanted review of a judgment from the Madison Circuit Court of Kentucky. The Madison Circuit Court had found the college guilty under two indictments for the suspected infractions of prohibiting white and African Americans from attending the same school. The college
Premium Kentucky School United States
Brown v. Southall Realty Co.‚ District of Columbia Court of Appeals‚ 1968‚ 237 A.2d. Parties: Lillie Brown‚ Defendant‚ Appellant Southall Realty‚ Plaintiff‚ Appellee Mr. Penn‚ Owner Judicial History: The Plaintiff‚ Southall Realty‚ filed suit to evict the defendant‚ Lillie Brown‚ for unpaid rent. The defendant contested that the rent was unpaid due to an illegal contract that was in violation of sections 2304 and 2501 of the D.C. Housing Regulations. The trial court of the District of
Premium Appeal Contract Lease
Helen Palsgraf‚ Respondent‚ v. The Long Island Railroad Company‚ Appellant Facts A passenger carrying a package‚ while hurrying to catch and board a moving Long Island Rail Road train‚ appeared to two of the railroad’s (Defendant’s) employees to be falling. The employees were guards‚ one of whom was located on the car‚ the other of whom was located on the platform. The guard on the car attempted to pull the passenger into the car and the guard on the platform attempted to push him into the
Premium Tort Law Tort law
UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI FACULTY OF LAW TAPE RECORDED LECTURES THE LAW OF EVIDENCE LLB II 2003 LAW OF EVIDENCE Lesson 2 RELEVANCE & ADMISSIBILITY RES GESTAE ‘Res Gestae’‚ it has been said‚ is a phrase adopted to provide a respectable legal cloak for a variety of cases to which no formula of precision can be applied’. The words themselves simply mean a transaction. Under the inclusionary common law doctrine of Res Gestae‚ a fact or opinion which is so closely associated in time‚ place
Premium Evidence law Jury
1. Sion Soleimany (Appellant‚ United Kingdom) v. Abner Soleimany (Respondent‚ United Kingdom) Court of Appeal‚ Civil Division‚ 30 January 1998‚ United Kingdom Facts Sion Soleimany (hereinafter referred to as the father) and his son‚ Abner Soleimany (refers as the son) were engaged in the export of Persian carpets from Iran. Between 1980 and 1983‚ the son arranged for the export of the carpets from Iran in contravention of Iranian Revenue laws and export controls. The carpets were sold by the father
Premium Arbitration Court
Karta of the Joint Family: His position‚ powers‚ privileges and obligation Meaning A Hindu joint family consists of the common ancestor and all his lineal male descendants upto any generation together with the wife/ wives (or widows) and unmarried daughters of the common ancestor and of the lineal male descendants. Whatever the skeptic may say about the future of the Hindu joint family‚ it has been and is still the fundamental aspect of the life of Hindus.A co-parcenery is a narrow body of
Premium Family Hindu law