1 MLJ 356. The appellants extended loans to the respondents and the loan was secured by documents and guarantees. The documents evidencing the loans showed that the hotel whose shares were being purchased by a company had given financial assistance to that company. This act contravened Section 67 of the Companies Act 1965. The Court held that: The transactions were tainted with illegalit Chung Khiaw Bank Ltd. v. Hotel Rasa Sayang Sdn. Bhd. & Anor[1990] 1 MLJ 356. The appellants extended loans
Premium Bond Debt Platoon
SUNIL INDUSTRIES versus RAM CHANDER PRADHAN & ANR Dated: 14 November 2000 Appellant: M/S. SUNIL INDUSTRIES Respondent: RAM CHANDER PRADHAN & ANR Bench: S.N.VARIAVA‚ S.R.BABU Judgement: S. N. VARIAVA‚ J. ACT: WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION ACT‚ 1923 Supreme Court Case INTRODUCTION TO THE CASE This Appeal is against an Order dated 7th May‚ 1997 by which the first appeal filed by the appellant has been dismissed in limine. Briefly stated the facts are as follows: The Petitioner
Premium Index finger Finger Appeal
State of U.P . Where Appellant Asgar has been convicted under Sec. 302 of IPC for intentionally causing the murder of one Ramswaroop Singh on account of an alleged dispute concurring the repayment of debt. On appeal Supreme Court held (Justice UNITWALLIA): "The High Court while confirming the death sentence does not seem to have clearly kept in view the change of law which was brought about by the 1955 amendment of the old code‚ when the
Premium Crime Capital punishment Murder
Wright v.Kehoe‚ 2010 ONSC 319(CanLII) Parties: David Kehoe and Total Credit Recovery Ltd. – Appellants Camille Wright – Respondent Date of Decision: January 12‚ 2010 Facts: On November 27‚ 2008‚ Camille Wright was awarded damages for slander and costs on a substantial indemnity basis in her lawsuit against David Kehoe and his employer Total Credit Recovery Ltd‚ a collection agency. In an effort to collect money owed from Ms. Wright for a leased car‚ which had been repossessed by the lessor
Premium Jury Law Tort
Case Note & CritiqueMasciantonio v The Queen (1995) 183 CLR 58 Case Note Appellant: Mr. Giovanni MasciantonioRespondent: The Queen Court & Year: High Court of Australia 1994 - 1995 Relevant Facts: Appeal from the Supreme Court of Victoria. 19 June 1991 Giovanni Masciantonio had a heated altercation with his son-in-law Maurizio Femia. Altercation resulted in Mr. Femia’s life. Fatal wound being a severed aorta (known as wound 5). Giovanni Masciantonio was convicted of murder in the
Premium Court Law Judge
Citation: Marien v Gardiner [2013] NSWCA 396 Court: Macfarlan‚ Meagher and Emmett JJA‚ panel of judges of the New South Wales Supreme Court of Appeal Material Facts: Shortly after five o’clock in the morning on 3 February 2009‚ Mr Gardiner was walking on Centenary Avenue with his back to oncoming traffic‚ approximately four to six metres from the southern kerb. There was an absence of natural light‚ and only one streetlight‚ which Mr Gardiner had already passed [5]. On the same morning
Free Common law Law Tort
RESPONDENT 1. Whether there is any privity of contract between the Appellant and the Respondents In the previous judgement the court had decided that there is no privity of contract between the appellant and the respondents since the general rule under the common law is that there is no privity of contract between the employer and the sub- contractor. The previous court has made a reference to the case of Royden (M) Sdn. Bhd V. Syarikat Pembenaan Yeoh Tiong Lay Sdn Bhd where the
Premium Common law Contract Judge
R. V Kiranjit Ahluwalia [1993] 96 Cr. APP. R. 133 Court of Appeal Introduction In this case‚ R. V Kiranjit Ahluwalia1‚ the appellant is kiranjit Ahluwalia and the respondent is Regina (the Crown). The Legal issue in the case was whether the use of provocation as a defense could stand as she had sufficient time to consider her action and also if it could stand as a defence to person who has suffered
Premium Jury Law Domestic violence
The appellant initially denied having possession of the firearm. However‚ upon being informed that somebody reported that he had in his possession an unlicensed firearm‚ the appellant admitted that he was really keeping a firearm given by former barrio lieutenant Pantaleon Garcia. Appellant was later taken to the municipal building‚ where the appellant expressly and voluntarily admitted that he received a gun from Pantaleon Garcia and then hid it by burying the can containing it. Appellant insists
Premium Trial court Criminal law Appeal
The Managing Director‚ Hassan Co-operative Milk Producer’s Society Union Limited ...Appellant Versus The Assistant Regional Director Employees State Insurance Corporation ...Respondent WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3817 OF 2010 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 3455 of 2008) JUDGEMENT R.M. Lodha‚ J. Leave granted. 2. These two appeals‚ by special leave‚ are concerned with the liability of the appellants to pay ESI contribution in respect of the workers employed by the contractors in performance
Premium Employment