LEJ 2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF F A^ SUPREME COURT CASE NO. 1051361 BARBARA MORRI S N ‚ Plaintiff /Appellant versus PATRICIA T. SPIVEY ET AL‚ Defendants/Appellees 1 Appeal from the Circuit Court of Henry County ‚ Alabama 1 BRIEF ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT ‚ BARB RA ISON Submitted by. . .... . ORIGINAL t Appellant Bar Russell Lee I y Albert H. Ada s‚ Jr. Attorneys for Plaintiff / ara Morrison Post Office ox 910 Eufaula‚ AL 36072-0910 TEL:
Premium Criminal law
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT Case No. 3D10-678 THEODORE GARZA Appellant‚ v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA‚ Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA INITIAL BRIEF OF APPELLEE BILL McCOLLUM Attorney General State of Florida _____________________ XXXXXXXXXXXX Assistant Attorney General Florida Bar No. 000416 Office of Attorney General Rivergate Plaza‚ Suite 610 444 Brickell Avenue Miami‚ FL 33131 Tel:
Premium Appellate court Supreme court Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
criticize our legal system for being too onerous. In our legal system‚ there is a three tiered court system in place of both State and Federal court system. Moreover‚ there is the intermediate court‚ also known as trial court‚ and there are the appellate or “higher” court. The higher courts are responsible for reviewing the verdicts that were previously made in the trial courts. However‚ when dealing with a trial court‚ the purpose is to handle civil matters. In this court‚ both sides represent their
Premium
t Kant: Critique of Pure Reason There have been many philosophical perspectives and debates held throughout the centuries on the foundations of human knowledge. The stand points that both Descartes and Locke have differ and both of these philosophers’ perspectives have contributed to the rational and empirical debate about the foundations of human knowledge. Descartes’ understanding of the foundations of human knowledge takes on a rational viewpoint and has lead to Locke’s response of an empirical
Premium Immanuel Kant Epistemology Empiricism
really skilled at something in general. While in philosophy‚ Kant defines genius as follow‚ ‘Genius is the talent (natural gift) that gives the rule to art [...] Genius is the inborn predisposition of the mind through which nature gives the rule to art’; ‘Beautiful art must necessarily be considered as art of genius’. (§46) To Kant‚ it is like beautiful art cannot live without genius‚ because beautiful art is the art of genius. As Kant mentioned‚ genius cannot be imitated‚ it is a special ability
Premium Aesthetics Arts Music
Explain the difference between transcendental realism (using Leibniz and Hume as examples) and Kant’s transcendental idealism. Why does Kant call his turn to transcendental idealism a “Copernican Revolution”. Transcendental realism claims that the world exists independently of human subjectivity. It also claims that the human thought or perception has no influence and does not effect the way world exists and cannot be interpreted by the way people interpret it. Transcendental realism relies
Premium Immanuel Kant Metaphysics
Appellate Opinion Research Project By: LaVetra Speight ASCM 627 Legal Aspects of Contracting University of Maryland University College Due: November 9‚ 2014 Introduction In this country‚ it is estimated that more than 1 billion venipunctures or blood drawings are performed by phlebotomists each year. According to Ogden-Grable (2005)‚ phlebotomy errors can cause serious harm to patients; up to and including death‚ either directly or indirectly. Therefore it is vital to establish‚ implement
Premium Contract Tort Breach of contract
Kant: Reasons and Causes‚ Morality and Religion Kant was a deontologist who believed that knowledge was created by the mind‚ not external factors; because of this he wanted to unite reason and experience. Humanity’s frail nature was the human condition according to Kant‚ their struggle to make moral decisions and do the right thing can only be solved by employing reason and his three maxims when decision making. Kant’s diagnoses the human condition as human’s frailty and impurity when
Premium Morality Categorical imperative Immanuel Kant
“Kant how are imperatives possible” In this passage Kant is stating is believes about imperatives by saying that in order to make a morally correct decision‚ there is a universal law that complies with all humans that can rationally think ‚ this law is not based upon humans own desires. Kant imperatives deal with universality consequently he stated that it is immoral if a rule cannot be made into something that all humankind can follow. For example if I say "I will never keep my promises"‚ this
Free Morality Human
Trial and Appellate Courts CJS 220 The Court System Trial and Appellate Courts Trial courts and appellate courts have differences not only in their functions but also in what and who are involved in the proceedings. Trial courts are the point of origin for the cases. The prosecutor’s function is to prove the defendant guilty through evidence‚ witness testimony‚ and possibly cross-examination of the defendant. The defense attorney works to disprove the prosecutor’s case through in the same
Premium Law Jury Court