I(2003)DMC73SC‚ 2002GLH(22)665‚ 2002GLH(665)22‚ (2003)1GLR148‚ ILR2002(3)Kerala545‚ 2003(1)JLJ171(SC)‚ JT2002(9)SC175‚ 2002-4-LW512‚ 2003(1)OLR650‚ RLW2007(3)SC2531‚ 2004(8)SCALE115‚ (2003)1SCC49‚ 2003(1)UC143‚ 2003 (1)UJ1‚ 2003(2)WLN665 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Decided On: 25.10.2002 Appellants: Salem Advocate Bar Association Vs. Respondent: Union of India (UOI) Hon’ble Judges/Coram: B. N. Kirpal‚ C.J.‚ Y. K. Sabharwal and Dr. Arijit Pasayat‚ JJ. Subject: Civil Acts/Rules/Orders: Code of
Free Appellate court Court Appeal
Court System Structure Checkpoint II Missouri State Court Systems vs. Texas State Court Systems CJS/220- Erin Berger The States of the United States have individual and unique governments with many similarities. All states are required by the constitution to have republican governments. Despite their similarities‚ all states have different government structures and procedures‚ as you will see in the following comparisons of Missouri and Texas state court systems. The Texas state court system
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE AND THE SUPREMACY OF EC LAW I. INTRODUCTION In the making and promulgation of Community law‚ the European Court of Justice (ECJ) plays a crucial role. Many of the fundamental doctrines of EC law are not to be found in the Treaties‚ or secondary EC legislation‚ but in the case law of the European Court. No provision of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) contains an express term regulating the issue of the supremacy between the Community and the various
Premium Law European Union European Union law
Art. 1544- Double Sale G.R. No. L-19248 7 SCRA 452 February 28‚ 1963 ILUMINADO HANOPOL vs. PERFECTO PILAPIL‚ BARRERA‚ J.: Case Nature : APPEAL from a decision of the Court of First instance of Leyte. Facts: Hanopol claims ownership of the land by virtue of a series of purchases effected in 1938 by means of private instruments‚ executed by the former owners surnamed Siapo. Additionally‚ he invokes in his favor a decision by the CFI of Leyte (in Civil Case No. 412) rendered
Premium Property Appellate court Appeal
subsequent endorsements by Supreme Court http://presidentmusharraf.wordpress.com/2009/02/01/musharraf-validity-by-supreme-court/ 1- On 13 May 2000‚ Pakistan’s 12 member Supreme Court unanimously validated the October 1999 coup and granted Musharraf executive and legislative authority for 3 years from the coup date. Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry was one of the judges that validated. (Link) 2- On 7 October 2002‚ the 5 member bench of Supreme Court validated LFO and amendments to constitution
Premium Pervez Musharraf President of Pakistan Pakistan
for negligence. 3. What was the lower court(s) (i.e.‚ trial court‚ appellate court‚ if applicable) ruling (identify the court(s)): Trial Court (TC) rendered a substantial verdict in favor of Riley 1st Appellette Court (1AC) reverses in favor of Standard Oil of New York 4. Issue (in the form of a question): Was Million acting in the scope of employment? 5. Holding of this court (i.e.‚ the one cited in 1. above) (how did the court answer the issue---YES OR NO-- resulting in
Premium Appeal United States Law
Copiague Union Free School District Court of Appeals of New York June 14‚ 1979 Edward Donahue filed a complaint against the Copiague Union Free School District in Suffolk County Supreme Court for monetary damages for “educational malpractice” and the negligent breach of a constitutionally imposed duty to educate. Donahue claims that even though he received a certificate of graduation from Copiague Senior High School‚ he is not able to read. The Court dismissed the complaint for failure to
Free High school Education School
signs of vetoes statutes oversees administrative agencies Judicial Branch- Federal Courts interpret statutes create (limited) federal common law review the constitutionality of statutes and other legal acts Federal Government 50 State Governments Legislative Branch Congress State Legislatures Executive Branch President Governors Judicial Branch Federal Court State Courts Court orders Judges
Premium Law Common law Supreme Court of the United States
enlargement. The Court of Justice was established in 1952 and since then it is located in Luxembourg. Its original name was Court of the European Coal and Steel Community. Its name was changed to the Court of Justice in 1958‚ which is used by 2009. After the Lisbon Treaty its new name is the Court of Justice. The Court of Justice structure consists of the General Court‚ the EU and the Tribunal‚ each of which with its own functions and responsibilities. The composition of the Court (also called the
Premium European Union European Economic Community Treaty of Lisbon
Intro Background story: On March 25‚ 1931‚ seven young white men entered a railroad stationmaster’s office in northern Alabama. They claimed that while they were riding the rails‚ a "bunch of Negroes" picked a fight with them and threw them off the train. The stationmaster phoned ahead to the next station‚ near Scottsboro‚ Alabama. A Scottsboro deputy sheriff made deputies of every man in town with a gun. When the train stopped‚ the posse (group of people legally authorized keep the peace) rounded
Premium Jury Supreme Court of the United States United States