Summary: Arauco(A): Forward Integration or Horizontal Expansion. Conclusion There is an obvious need for transformation in this company to protect its debt holders‚ shareholders‚ and employees. Concentrating on products that will have a growing demand such as toilet paper‚ tissue paper‚ and magazine paper would aid in stabilizing the company’s earnings. Having over 50% of revenues derive from pulp sales increases risk of instability. Attempting to first reduce costs and pay outstanding
Premium Paper Harvard Business School Pressure
NPV is short for Net Present Value and it makes difference between the present value and cost of a project. In addition‚ NPV takes into account all cash flows through out the whole life of the projects‚ as well as the time value of money. And it compares like with like as all inflows and outflows are discounted to today¡¯s date. Also‚ the cost of capital is very unlikely to be changed over a period of time. To judge if the NPV is good‚ we should see the value of it‚ and the rule is the high the better
Premium Net present value Discounted cash flow Time
new entrants. Government policies and regulations control forest harvesting and can sometimes act as a disincentive for existing competitors. Competitive and Strategic position of Celulosa Arauco (See Exhibit 3) The biggest competitive advantage for Celulosa Arauco is its cost advantage. Celulosa Arauco has been successful to maintain high production efficiencies by investing into Research and Development and Forest Management. It also uses economies of scale to negotiate prices with paper buyers
Premium Investment Price Costs
Janice Miller American Intercontinental University Managerial Accounting 310 Instructor: Matt Keogh Introduction “Net Present Value (NPV) is the present value of the net cash inflows generated by a project including salvage value‚ if any‚ less the initial investment on the project‚” (Irfanullah‚ Jan.‚ 2013). It is preferred as one of the most reliable measures employed in capital budgeting since it accounts for the time value of money as it uses the discounted cash inflows. The net cash
Premium Net present value
“Arauco (A): Forward Integration or Horizontal Expansion?” Arauco is an important Chilean forestry company formed in 1979. The company has three main product segments which are wood products‚ pulp products and forestry products. In 2004 the CEO was experiencing a decisional problem concerning whether it was better for shareholders to develop a horizontal structure already existing by building a new pulp plant‚ or to focus on a vertical integration and enter into the paper production. The approach
Premium Paper Wood Economics
------------------------------------------------- “Arauco: Forward Integration or Horizontal Expansion” Case Arauco is a major Chilean producer of pulp and wood products. In order to increase its capacity‚ the company has launched in 1980‚ an aggressive expansion plan by purchasing lands‚ plantations and installing new technology equipment. Arauco is today considered as one of the world biggest forestry company with 1.2 million hectares of plantation. Its global strategy is aimed at strengthening
Premium Strategic management Paper Vertical integration
Should Arauco own both forests and pulp production facilities? Does the Alto Paraná project help you answer this question? According to the information of the case‚ clearly Arauco should own it own forests and facilities‚ because the benefits from Vertical Integration are bigger than it costs. The first case is‚ even when‚ the ownership of both kinds of sources can decrease the efficiency of the entire business‚ it can create an increasing in the location efficiency (because you can locate the
Premium Cost Costs Transaction cost
Net Present Value and Internal Rate of Return by Harold Bierman‚ Jr Executive Summary • • • Net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR) are two very practical discounted cash flow (DCF) calculations used for making capital budgeting decisions. NPV and IRR lead to the same decisions with investments that are independent. With mutually exclusive investments‚ the NPV method is easier to use and more reliable. Introduction To this point neither of the two discounted cash flow procedures
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return Capital budgeting
When cash inflows are even: NPV = R × 1 − (1 + i)-n − Initial Investment i In the above formula‚ R is the net cash inflow expected to be received each period; i is the required rate of return per period; n are the number of periods during which the project is expected to operate and generate cash inflows. When cash inflows are uneven: NPV = R1 + R2 + R3 + ... − Initial Investment (1 + i)1 (1 + i)2 (1 + i)3 Where‚ i is the target rate of return per period;
Premium Net present value Rate of return Cash flow
this online NPV Calculation Tool http://finance.thinkanddone.com/online-n… we get the following NPV at 15% Net Cash Flows CF0 = -3000000 CF1 = 1100000 CF2 = 1450000 CF3 = 1300000 CF4 = 950000 Discounted Net Cash Flows DCF1 = 1100000/(1+0.15)^1 = 1100000/1.15 = 956521.74 DCF2 = 1450000/(1+0.15)^2 = 1450000/1.3225 = 1096408.32 DCF3 = 1300000/(1+0.15)^3 = 1300000/1.52087 = 854771.1 DCF4 = 950000/(1+0.15)^4 = 950000/1.74901 = 543165.58 NPV Calculation NPV = 956521.74 +
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return Cash flow