1.) Synthetic Resin PP=2+250‚000500‚000 =2.5 yrs. Epoxy Resin PP=1+200‚000400‚000 =1.5 yrs. ***Tim must explain to the board that Payback Method does not consider the cost of the capital (debt/equity) that the project will undertake which is reflected in the cash flow. It only states the length of time the company will be tied up in the project. He should also emphasize that the PBP method ignores the time value of money as well as the cash flows occuring after the payback period
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return
the above formula‚ A is the last period with a negative cumulative cash flow; B is the absolute value of cumulative cash flow at the end of the period A; C is the total cash flow during the period after A Net Present Value: Net present value (NPV) is used to
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return Cash flow
that we have been under. Our analysis shows that the Zinser 351 project will yield a Net Present Value of $6‚474‚082.14 million and a discounted payback period of 5.6 years. This project not only brings a big enough payoff as demonstrated by the NPV‚ but also fits our timeline. The discounted payback period indicates that our investment will be realized before our company is not able to recover from our current financial struggles. The Zinser 351 is a project that this company must undertake
Premium Net present value
1) Estimate the WACC that is appropriate for discounting the Collinsville plant’s incremental cash flows. You should estimate and present each component of the WACC separately‚ explaining briefly but clearly what assumptions you are making for each of them. In the same spirit‚ estimate the appropriate all-equity cost of capital for the APV-based valuation. WACC calculation. WACC = RD*(1-t)*D/(D+E)+RE* E/(D+E) Cost of equity We assume that risk free rate (Rf) equals rate of long-term Treasury
Premium Net present value Weighted average cost of capital Investment
Objectives: 1. The basics of incremental-cash-flow analysis: identifying the cash flows relevant to a capital-investment decision 2. The construction of a side-by-side discounted-cash-flow analysis for a replacement decision 3. How to adapt the NPV decision rule to a troubled industry 4. The recognition that a reduced investment horizon is a significant consequence of financial distress 5. The importance of sensitivity analysis to a capital-investment decision Case Questions 1. How
Premium Investment
of Return 18.732% Question 3: Knowing that Torgler wants a return of 12% permits the use of the NPV approach to the problem. We know it will be a positive NPV since Question 2 indicated a IRR greater than 12%‚ but it would still be interesting to know the actual number. Using the cash flow data from the previous question and a discount rate of 12% yields a NPV of SFr 174‚080.56 which is the Present Value of the Inflows = SFr 774‚080.56 less the Present Value of the Outflows (Initial
Premium Cash flow Net present value Rate of return
before-tax required rate of return for Deer Valley is 14%. Compute the before-tax NPV of the new lift and advise the managers of Deer Valley about whether adding the lift will be a profitable investment. Show calculations to support your answer. 2. Assume that the after-tax required rate of return for Deer Valley is 8%‚ the income tax rate is 40%‚ and the MACRS recovery period is 10 years. Compute the after-tax NPV of the new lift and advise the managers of Deer Valley about whether adding the lift
Premium Net present value Rate of return Internal rate of return
152.252 Assignment 1 Project Management Kerry Pilcher 10114098 TO: Director and Research Associates of Te Au Rangahau FROM: Kerry Pilcher Project Analyst DATE: 20/03/2013 SUBJECT: Investment Portfolio Analysis The basic goal of project portfolio management is to select the projects and programmes out of a set of necessary and available projects within the organization whose realization helps achieve the strategic organizational goals‚ taking into account the available resources
Premium Net present value
there is no cannibalization effect to our sales from the other’s producer’s activities. In the case that we accept the leasing proposal‚ assume an agreement for 4 years and receive the payment at the end of each period‚ we have a NPV of $75‚933‚ which is lower than the NPV of our project which is $1‚203‚759. So‚ assuming equal life of the projects and no other side-effects‚ we would prefer to go on with the Lite project and not to lease the production. The fact that we decide to go on with the
Premium Net present value Cash flow Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
calculation evaluates a future stream of benefits and expenses by converting them to present values. A discount rate is used to discounted future benefits and the total sum of discounted costs is subtracted form the benefits. The relevant formula for NPV is: Where t - the time of the cash flow n - the total time of the project r - the discount rate Ct - the net cash flow (the amount of cash) at that point in time. C0 - the capitial outlay at the beginning of the investment time ( t = 0 ) (Wikipedia
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return