corruption is dealt in the International Arbitration Arena‚ the International Laws‚ if any to deal with it and also its nature. Arbitration‚ as known has been one of the best forms of ADR ( Alternate Dispute Resolution ). It is basically a tribunal‚ not necessarily a group of people who gives the award upon the complete hearing of the case which does not take a prolonged period unlike the normal cases in courts. As said by a eminent legal personality “Commercial arbitration must have existed
Premium Arbitration Contract
of arbitration‚ its purpose and general characteristics. At its core‚ arbitration is the private‚ judicial determination of a dispute‚ by an independent third party. An arbitration hearing may involve the use of an individual arbitrator or a tribunal. A tribunal may consist of any number of arbitrators though some legal systems insist on an odd number for obvious reasons of wishing to avoid a tie. One and three are the most common numbers of arbitrators. The disputing parties hand over their power
Premium Arbitration
to establish a segmentation of ideas in respect with the relevance of Contracts Act with Arbitration laws prevailing in our legal system. The paper aims at a critical analysis prerogative to the extent to which Indian courts can intervene in the arbitral process. Subsequently the paper reveals a pavement of prospects of Dispute Resolution justified with relevant case laws. Introduction Arbitration has given the economy a large number of choices‚ while resolving complicated
Premium Arbitration Contract
of an arbitral award would ‘shock the conscience’… or is ‘clearly injurious to the public good or...wholly offensive to the ordinary reasonable and fully informed member of the public’…or where it violates the forum’s most basic notion of morality and justice’…” International comity AJT 22 In the light of the Tribunal’s finding that the Concluding Agreement was valid and enforceable‚ public policy was prima facie not engaged for the obvious reason that there was (according to the Tribunal) no illegality
Premium Arbitration
Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Philippines: Arbitration’s under-harnessed potential Zara Marie Dy J.D. 2014 Silliman University Atty. Norberto Denura Law 109 – Legal Research & Writing October 2010 Abstract Arbitration has steadfastly journeyed through Philippine legislative history in the past few centuries with roots tracing back to the Spanish Ley Enjuicinamente de Civil or the Spanish Law of Civil
Premium Arbitration Court
is a non-institutional arbitration that the parties organize to solve a particular dispute outside a permanent arbitration institution. Characteristics: ( it is organized to solve a certain dispute; after the arbitral award is finalised‚ this arbitral tribunal is disbanded; ( both the structure and procedure rules of ad-hoc arbitration will be different‚ according to the parties’ interests in each dispute; ( the parties may entrust the settlement of the dispute
Premium Arbitration Law
Gram Sabha 2. Lok Adalats Name of student: Shiwani Question 2: How is the arbitration tribunal appointed. Also explain the Jurisdiction enjoyed by the Arbitral Tribunal. Name of student: Gurkirat Singh Question 3: Describe the form and content of Arbitral Award. Also explain the grounds of setting aside an Award. Name of student: Shantanu Singh Question 4: Explain the procedure of enforcement of Arbitral Awards. Name of student: Nishant Sharma Question 5: Explain Settlement Agreement and
Premium Arbitration
Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya national law university Foundation of Law Final Project “Alternative Dispute Resolution” “It is the spirit and not the form of law that keeps the justice alive.”
Premium Arbitration Dispute resolution Alternative dispute resolution
Arbitration Final Paper Name: Nikhil Mathur I.D: 20100102 Index 1) Introduction p. 3 2) Party Autonomy v. Procedural Safeguards p. 4 3) Why can’t the courts be trusted? p.5 a) The issue of Public Policy
Premium Arbitration
International Commercial Arbitration “Whether Role of National Court Undermine International Arbitration” Final Draft for IXth semester submitted to the Asst. Proff. of Law‚ Mr. P. Kundu‚ Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University‚ Lucknow‚ In Partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the B.A. LL.B.(Hons.)Course 2012-2013. 2012 Arpit Shrivastava Roll No.: 29 International Commercial Arbitration “Whether Role of National Court Undermine International Arbitration” Final Draft
Premium Arbitration