The MV Lilian S 1 1 Owners of the Motor Vessel “Lillian S” v Caltex Oil (Kenya) Ltd 5 Court of Appeal‚ at Mombasa Nyarangi‚ Masime & Kwach JJ A November 17‚ 1989 Civil Appeal No 50 of 1989 (Appeal from an order of the High Court at Mombasa‚ Bosire J‚ in Admiralty Cause No 29 of 1988 dated 28th February‚ 1989) Admiralty Law – admirality jurisdiction of the High Court Kenya – circumstances in which the jurisdiction can be invoked – Judicature Act (Cap 8)‚ section 4 – Supreme Court Act‚ 1981 sections
Premium Appeal Court Supreme court
Chappell & Co Ltd v The Nestlé Co Ltd [1959] 2 All ER 701 House of Lords Nestlé‚ manufacturers of wrapped chocolate bars‚ advertised for sale‚ as part of an advertising campaign‚ the record ’Rockin’ Shoes’. The price of the record was 1s 6d plus three wrappings from their 6d chocolate bars. Chappell‚ who were the sole licensees of the copyright of ’Rockin’ Shoes’‚ claimed that Nestlé had infringed their copyright and sought injunction and damages. Nestlé claimed that they were entitled to
Premium Gramophone record Contract Sales
http://www.studymode.com/subjects/souter-v-shyamba-pty-ltd-page1.html Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd (1897)- company is a separate legal entity Lee v Lee’s Air Farming (1961) Case Summary: The facts disclosed that in 1954‚ Mr. Lee had formed the respondent company carrying on the business of crop spraying from the air. Mr. Lee owned 2‚999 of the company’s 3‚000 shares. Apart from that‚ he also was the company’s governing director whereby he had appointed himself as the only pilot of the company
Premium Employment
Undergraduate Laws Case note March 2014: Important case note LA3021 Company law Prest v Petrodel Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1395 Facts The parties were married in 1993. The wife was granted a divorce in 2008. In an action for ancillary relief the husband argued that properties could not be transferred to the wife as they were legally owned by various companies. These companies were wholly owned and controlled by the husband. The question on appeal was whether the court has power to order the transfer
Premium Law Appeal Supreme court
organization 4 4.6 Inkwell Ltd-Key external stakeholders 5 5. THE ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT 5 5.3 The accounts department-Key internal stakeholders 6 6. REVIEW OF THE ACCOUNTING SYSTEM 7 6.3 Working methods and practices 7 6.4 Recording keeping system 8 6.5 Training 9 7. INTERNAL CONTROL AND FRAUD ANALYSIS 9 7.1 Internal system of control 9 7.2 Fraud Analysis 10 8. RECOMMENDATIONS TO IMPROVE 10 9. COSTS AND BENEFITS ANALYSIS 12 9.2 COSTS 12 9.3 BENEFITS 13 APPENDIX 1-INKWELL (LTD)’S ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE
Premium International Financial Reporting Standards Accounting software International Accounting Standards Board
HãyđọccácđoạntríchtrongbảnánvàxácđịnhcácnguồnluậtvàTòaánđãsửdụng Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd From Wikipedia‚ the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Broderip v Salomon) Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 is a landmark1 UK company law case. The effect of the Lords ’ unanimous 2 ruling was to uphold 3firmly the doctrine4 of corporate personality‚ as set out in the Companies Act 1862‚ so that creditors of an insolvent company could not sue the company ’s shareholders to pay up outstanding debts. Facts[edit]
Premium Corporation
Sales Growth Rate (after 2020) 26 6.3.3 Share Price Sensitivity to Changes in WACC 27 6.4 Comparison of the Estimated and Actual Share Price 28 7 Investment Recommendation 29 8 Appendix 30 9 Reference 34 Executive Summary Blackmores LTD (BKL) which started in the 1930s is a major player in developing and marketing products and services that deliver a more natural approach to health‚ based on their expertise in vitamins‚ minerals‚ herbs and nutrients. For the year ended 30 June 2010
Premium Dividend yield Dividend Weighted average cost of capital
Blackmores Ltd Table of Contents 1 introduction 1 2 2 3 Corporation Background 3 3.1 Organization 3 3.2 Market Position 3 3.3 Government Impact 4 3.4 Description of Competitors 4 4 Capital Structure 6 4.1 Blackmores’ Current & Historical Leverage 6 4.1.1 Debt to Equity Ratio 6 4.1.2 Degree of Financial Leverage and Operating Leverage 8 4.2 Capital Expenditure and Financing 9 4.3 Capital Structure Relative to Competitors 10 4.4 Bankruptcy Risk Assessment 11 4
Premium Dividend yield Dividend Weighted average cost of capital
Background Facts Paul Simard has accepted the position as the plant manager of Jonquiere plant in Ancol Ltd. In order to strengthen relations between management and employees‚ Paul decided to remove all time clocks from the plant. Instead‚ the plant would assume that employees had put in their full shift. Two months later‚ however‚ the absenteeism started to appear. Problems All of problems resulted from the removal of the time clocks were that the increased absenteeism levels were beginning to
Premium Problem solving Trade union Management
Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd KB 130 (or the High Trees case) is an English contract law decision in the High Court. It reaffirmed the doctrine of promissory estoppel in contract law in England and Wales. Denning J held estoppel to be‚ Facts In 1937‚ High Trees House Ltd leased a block of flats in Clapham‚ London‚ for a rate £2500/year from Central London Property Trust Ltd. Due to the conditions during the beginning of World War II occupancy rates were drastically lower
Premium Common law Renting