Debating Speech – 1st speaker That the Australian Government should protect anti-whaling protesters who forcibly disrupt whaling ships Hello adjudicator‚ negative team and time keeper. I am… the first speaker of the Affirmative team. I will cover the points of whaling‚ and the legalities in Australia that surround it. We the Affirmative team define the topic as: The Australian Government should protect and safeguard the anti-whaling protesters who’s main objective is to stop the illegal
Premium Whaling Humpback whale
............................................... AS Psychology Mark scheme for extended writing (12 marks): AO1 Knowledge and understanding AO2 Application of knowledge and understanding 6 marks Accurate and reasonably detailed Accurate and reasonably detailed description of research that demonstrates sound knowledge and understanding of relevant research. There is appropriate selection of material to address the question. 6 marks Effective evaluation Effective use
Premium Evaluation Sentence
Negative My partner and I negate the resolution: “Resolved: The U.S. government should not require its citizens to have health insurance.” Before we begin‚ we would like to make the following observation: The government’s intention in implementing this requirement would be to benefit the citizenry and the nation as a whole. Con may win the round if it can prove that a mandate would benefit citizens as a whole. 1st Contention: The Affordable Care Act Benefits the Private Sector Sub Point
Premium Health care Medicare Health insurance
Starting with facts and figures can confuse or mislead you to the real question‚ why‚ which can be described as their purpose‚ belief‚ or cause. Companies such as Apple have used this to their advantage by gathering an almost cult like following‚ even though they might not have the best product. Over the years Apple has gone from just a computer company to something much bigger. Gateway is a great example of a company who marketed what type of processer they had‚ what was included‚ and how much
Premium
AICPA Code of Professional Conduct Jonathan Weindel ETH/376 3/2/2015 Shanaika Muldrow AICPA Code of Professional Conduct The AICPA Code of Professional Conduct is a voluntary group of CPA’s that embody the principle of “professional based responsibilities despite personal benefit or gain” (Mintz and Morris‚ 2011‚ page 14). The AICPA Code of Professional Conduct has six responsibilities that help CPA’s meet and exceed obligations to the public. These six responsibilities include responsibilities
Premium Ethics Business ethics Virtue
in the college and professional level and it’s growing rapidly growing. At this level athletes put a lot of their time to spend hours every day practicing. Right now‚ a college athlete cannot be given money for their effort or marketed in a way that could profit the school or themselves. A growing debate centers on whether these athletes should be able to make money for all their hard work. Every year‚ the NCAA and other universities earn millions of dollars from their athletes that everyone loves
Premium College University High school
Their athleticism shows how much these female athletes put in. Whether it’s in a gym‚ field‚ or track‚ girls know how to strive towards hard work. People see these girls dress in sweats‚ sweatshirts‚ running shoes‚ yogas‚ and caps on a daily basis. This is why female athletes get categorized everyday by peers. Just because they are apart of the “jock” clique‚ people automatically assume certain things towards these athletes. Female athletes often get taken as “tomboys” simply because of the
Premium Stereotype Psychology Sociology
Over the years the question has been debatable as well as opinionated by scientists and many people in the professions related to psychology‚ the question being; is psychology a science? However isn’t the bigger question‚ revolving around this‚ what is science? It is only by being able to realize what science is that a person is able to see if psychology is a science or through differentiation is not a science. Therefore in order to answer this question and to be able to understand what a science
Free Psychology Scientific method Science
Athletes are Not Above the Law: Double Standard Athletes Should any athlete be judged on what kind of person he or she is on or off the field‚ court‚ or swimming pool? The answer is yes‚ athletes should be punished for actions which occur in their own personal lives. In today’s world‚ sport stars and other athletes are looked up to by all ages. Everyone loves them. They look great in the eyes of the everyday public. They appear on television; they perform like rock stars‚ and do this with the
Premium 2008 Summer Olympics Gold medal Michael Phelps
athletics being dangerous from the time you couldn’t catch a ball‚ to the time when it hurts just to stand‚ there are risks with any sport. So whenever college athletes step on the court‚ field‚ or wherever they compete‚ they are putting their bodies at risk‚ as well as future paychecks. In the history of NCAA there have been many professional careers either derailed or stopped forever because of injuries. In the 2006 college football season one of the best players‚ Michael Bush was playing for the
Premium High school College Concussion