certain of our actions as humans are necessarily right or wrong. What would happen if we say two contradictory statements can’t coexist as Aristotle demonstrated? Through the law of non-contradiction from Aristotle and ethical absolutism‚ I will argue against ethical relativism. In ethical absolutism‚ there is only one answer on certain human actions‚ following an objective moral code. According to absolutists‚ this code has been the same ever since humans have existed. Logically‚ this code applies to
Premium Morality Ethics Relativism
Capital Punishment What are some of the arguments used for and against capital punishment? Some of the basic arguments for and against the taking of human life in certain instances are suicide and war. Most religious arguments in taking of human life believe it is Gods responsibly not our place in deciding when a life should be taken. How does the ethical debate on capital punishment touch on the issues of the value of human life‚ human rights‚ and human dignity? Only when an innocent life
Premium Murder Human rights Morality
One argument that someone may make against my own argument could be something surrounding pre-determinism‚ stating‚ “what if someone was pre-determined to commit a crime‚ a murder‚ something that was pre-determined before birth‚ would they still be morally responsible for their actions. Personally‚ I believe that pre-determinism is a strong opposition that many would argument against my stance‚ and yes‚ pre-determinism can affect one’s free will. But I also believe that even if something is predetermined
Premium
relationships and households should be incorporated into the family laws. Focusing on obtaining what heterosexuals have for same sex marriages risks leaving behind other households‚ families and relationships of homosexuals. Arguments for gays having equal rights The first argument for same sex marriage rights is the social factor. Including same sex couples in the institution of marriage smoothen the apparent rough edges of same sex relationships. It promotes the stability and the welfare of the both
Premium Homosexuality Same-sex marriage Marriage
Webster defines an abortion as a medical procedure used to end a pregnancy and cause the death of the fetus. Just reading these definitions begin the argument of whether or not abortion should be legal and if it is “morally” right. Abortion has become a popular topic of discussion across politics and within churches. Although both sides have valid arguments‚ it is up to the woman carrying the child to decide whether she will keep the child or not. No government‚ nor religion should force someone into
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Fetus
SeaWorld’s Argument Against BlackFish The website for SeaWorld Parks and Entertainment is speaking towards anyone that has seen the documentary BlackFish‚ or anyone who thinks that SeaWorld is abusing or mistreating the orcas or other animals by keeping them in captivity. They also attract the corporate side of SeaWorld as a business. The website gives information about what the business does to give back to the community‚ how their animals are treated and shows their credibility to draw
Premium Marine biology Critical thinking Animal
The argument that there is no cataleptic impression is a sound argument based on the four claims given to us. When an impression is said to be cataleptic it means that it is so true that it cannot be doubted. Each given premise can be deemed true through reasoning; and through that very logic‚ we come to conclude that the argument against cataleptic impressions is a valid one. The arguments are as follows: 1. Some impressions are true and others false. 2. A false impression is not cataleptic. 3.
Premium Argument Conclusion Logic
opportunity to become a part of the American polity. Nevertheless‚ Anti-immigrant groups argue three points against immigration reform. The first point‚ is that unauthorized immigrants broke the law and should not be rewarded for criminal behavior. Although unauthorized entry to the country is a civil violation‚ anti-immigrant groups treat it as a criminal violation. The second argument opponents of immigration reform make‚ is that unauthorized immigrants are somehow hurting the workforce. Anti-immigrant
Premium
the aims of improving their performance in their field. It does this by mainly promoting muscle building. There are three disadvantages to the permission of consumption of steroids in sports‚ which will be discussed in this essay. The main argument against the permission of steroid use in sports is its long term consequences on an athlete’s health. Examples of these negative health affects are prominent breast‚ infertility‚ and shrunken testicles in males. Females taking steroids experience deepening
Premium Anabolic steroid Testosterone Androgen
This statement should not even be considered as an argument against women playing rugby because it is a hasty generalization‚ that has no concrete basis. Nevertheless‚ people in the middle east never stop trying to enforce that statement on women. They hide behind the statement instead of facing the logical side
Premium Gender Female Woman