Wikipedia as a Credible Source Group A MGT/521 Management January 24‚ 2010 Wikipedia as a Credible Source With the emergence of the internet as a resource center for students a question arises on the credibility of web based sites. In this paper we will debate the use of Wikipedia as a credible source of information. Support of Wikipedia Since navigating the web can be difficult in obtaining information Wikipedia should be viewed as a primary source of initial‚ credible and valid
Premium Source Credibility Research
unfamiliar words and symbols are worthy of credibility and thus believe what he has to say. If Drum were to aim this information at scientists or college students‚ it most likely does not work as well because they already are very familiar with the meaning of the word or have time to research about it later to learn the meaning. He consistently
Premium Critical thinking Audience Meaning of life
demands of spending consumers. Reasons For the Claim: 1) Companies must reserve the right to hire based on looks to establish business credibility. Credibility is a company’s ability to show trustworthiness‚ and expertise to its customers. When choosing between potentially equal applicants‚ employers must reserve the right to factor the credibility of their personal appearance. In a fitness gym‚ employers must reserve a right to employ the best physically fit trainers based on their appearance
Premium Human physical appearance Employment Customer service
Consequently‚ it is imperative that each source is evaluated to determine its credibility (Spatt‚ 2011). This paper will induce that Wikipedia is not a credible source of information for academic writing as debated by Team A by presenting both sides of the debate‚ providing a complete account of the argument‚ citing support‚ and providing fair presentation through identifying the criteria used to evaluate credibility of sources. Prior to outlining Team A’s debate‚ it is important to note the
Premium Wikipedia Source Critical thinking
Informational and Transformational Responses to Celebrity Endorsements Kenneth R. Lord and Sanjay Putrevu Using three studies‚ this research examines the relationship between dimensions of celebrity endorser credibility (attractiveness‚ expertise‚ trustworthiness) and consumer motivation (informational and transformational). Studies 1 and 2 reveal celebrity expertise and trustworthiness are the primary determinants of informational processing‚ while attractiveness is the principal variable driving
Premium Brand Credibility Dimension
Title | Examining Different Arguments Related to the Choice of a Career | Assessment Part A: Critically Evaluating an Argument | Arts and Sciences (Advantage): Lots of flexibility in career choices | Logically Sound | | Arts and Sciences (Disadvantage): Leads to a career in food service – ’Do you want fries with that?’ | Oversimplifying | | Education (Advantage): The best way to make a difference in the world | Shifting the Burden of Proof | | Education (Disadvantage):
Premium Logic Argument Critical thinking
reliable and safe. Develop your own argument based on the debate outcomes. The outcome of our team debate produced typical answers and conjured the obvious questions about the credibility and accuracy of articles and information through out the Wikipedia site. Two primary points were made by the team against Wikipedia as a credible source. First and foremost‚ the site is able to be edited by anyone and everyone. Secondly there is always the fear of author credibility. Even though the majority of articles
Premium Wikipedia Website Credibility
were only three members in the group so the approach had to be adjusted to make sure that both sides of the argument were addressed fairly by allowing each member a chance to present his or her argument for or against the creditability of the website. Ground rules were established and followed. The team made sure an inductive and deductive approached was taken when discussing the credibility and validity of Wikipedia. Each member agreed that Wikipedia is an excellent source for a quick reference
Premium Wikipedia Credibility Source
An Essay Doesn’t Need Proof To Be Published In The U.S. “Appearances Are Destructive”‚ by Mark Mathabane is all a matter of opinion and does not have hard evidence in it. In his essay Mathabane tries poorly to persuade others to believe as he does. He does so without any experts‚ facts‚ or counterpoints to his claims. Mathabane states that “the experience of my two sisters makes a compelling case for greater use of dress codes as a way to protect students and promote learning.”The Author
Premium Critical thinking Trousers Modesty
masculinity? In the article Aleck Eror writes his answers vary from topic to topic. Aleck says that some can experience a crisis due to the governments influence and how the world has feminized the male population. Eror continues‚ on the create forms credibility with his form of writing to the reader and creating a bond with the reader. The ways he connects with a reader and makes personal experiences more vivid to get a idea on how there is really a problem with millennials feeling less masculine. These
Premium Generation Y United States Man