who terrorize or frighten others”. The Case for Torture by Michael Levin. His argument is “Torture is impermissible‚ a throwback to a more brutal age” (Page 605‚ Paragraph 1). I don’t agree with his argument about terrorist I think terrorist deserve they are putting others in risk but I do agree with him that the difference terrorist and their victims. I’m going to write about why the terrorist should be torture‚ why the terrorist is dangerous‚ and why torture could be a way to stop the terrorist.
Premium
“The Case of Torture” “The Case of Torture” written by‚ Michael Levin is a an essay about how torture is valuable‚ that “the lives of the innocent people must be saved even at the price of hurting the one who endangered them”. Pg. 360 The other gives two great scenarios‚ in my opinion that would permit for torture. The first incident he gave an example of was; suppose a terrorist planted a bomb at an important monument and said the bomb was going to go off at a certain time. Say for instance we
Premium Torture Human rights Morality
"The Case for Torture" by Michael Levin‚ presents excellent justification for the use of torture in situations of extreme desperation. Levin gives great arguments for the use of torture through clever wording and great exemplification. In supplement to the already great argument‚ he provides potential counter-arguments and proves why they are invalid. It is made very clear that he believes that torture is morally mandatory and makes great effort to sway the opinion of readers‚ provided they keep
Premium Writing Essay Argument
to Torture Suspected Terrorists to Gather Information” by Vincent Iacopino and “The Case for Torture” by Michael Levin both use different techniques to defend their stance against torture. However‚ both authors use deductive reasoning to defend their opinion on torture and both authors have similarities through out their essays and use some of the same examples to explain their argument. Both essays make a strong argument against torture but I feel Michael Levin’s essay “The Case for Torture” is
Premium Torture Human rights United States
possibly save those lives. In “The Case for Torture” Michael Levin is focusing on torture as a possible solution. He is claiming the use of torture not as a punishment but‚ an acceptable measure for preventing future evil and‚ acquiring valuable information in extreme situations. It is because millions of innocent lives that are in danger will outweigh the maximum excruciating possible pain for a person convicted guilty. In all of his examples he is showing torture as the only possible
Premium Human rights Torture Violence
Michael Levin’s “The Case for Torture” argues that there are various reasons for allowing torture to exist in the United States of America. Levin would love to see society change its negative views on torture so that‚ under certain circumstances‚ torture would be permissible. The article starts off with a very brief description of how he believes society views the subject of torture as a negative thing. He leads on to oppose that way of thinking and provides three cases in which he believes torture
Premium Capital punishment Torture Nuclear weapon
outweighs all other mental decisions‚ thought outweighs function. In Michael Levin’s analysis he states that‚ “Homosexuality is likely to cause unhappiness because it leaves unfulfilled an innate and innately rewarding desire.” This reasoning takes information from one fact and jumps to the conclusion of another. This slippery slope relies heavily on anatomy. Levin neglected human thought and pleasure‚ ultimately making his argument invalid. Nature made it possible for the human race to survive through
Premium Morality Homosexuality Sexual orientation
Simply Wrong Dictionary.com defines torture as “the act of inflicting excruciating pain‚ as punishment or revenge‚ as a means of getting a confession or information‚ or for sheer cruelty.” A second definition at dictionary.com states torture as “extreme anguish of body or mind; agony.” Torture does not sound pleasant at all and yet people insist upon defending and supporting the barbaric deed. Even the strong main arguments in support of torture fall flat when stood up against its opposition. It
Premium Salem witch trials Torture Terrorism
examine the argument of “Is Homosexuality Wrong?” by Michael Levin. The argument used for this assignment can be located on pages 157-185 in our text. We will discuss Levin’s premises and conclusion as to why he believes homosexuality is wrong and that discriminations against homosexuals should not be undone. Also I will offer a counter argument as to why I believe that there is nothing wrong with homosexuality and thus discriminations in place against homosexuals should be undone. Michael Levin argues
Premium Homosexuality Same-sex marriage Sexual orientation
Analysis Evaluating Michael Levin’s “The Case for Torture” Torture is a concept that Americans attempt to avoid. If a criminal possesses the opportunity to harm innocent lives‚ the delinquent should be stopped. The idea presides in Michael Levin’s “The Case for Torture”; Levin attempts to portray a point that the act of torturing terrorists in order to save innocent lives is justifiable. Throughout the article‚ Levin fabricates situations to present his argument that torture is not a bad idea. He
Free Rhetoric Question Suffering