In the second part of the reading by William Lane Craig and James D. Sinclair‚ the authors give reasons to support the kalam cosmological argument. Overall‚ they provided good arguments to support their claims. There was one part of the passage that I had a different idea on. There was a passage where the authors used a boiling kettle as an analogy to the universe. The authors reasoned that there were two explanations to the question‚ “Why is the kettle boiling?” One being a scientific explanation
Premium God Existence Universe
opposing side of the argument and gave sufficient evidence to back his claim. This is also an example of how self-subversive thinking should be used to help better explain complex topics such as global warming. Had the professor been a confident bulldozer‚ all of the students‚ including me‚ would not have learned as much as we did. We would not have understood the opposing side and in turn‚ would have become confident bulldozers about the global warming. This supports Schulz’s argument about how self-subversive
Premium Salem witch trials Witchcraft The Crucible
a paragraph of roughly 100 words‚ summarize Michel Foucault and Roland Barthes’s central arguments in “What is an Author?” and “The Death of the Author.” Your goal is to capture the overarching argument‚ the big picture. Often‚ you will recognize the central argument when the rhetoric becomes abstract‚ more explanatory‚ conceptual‚ or theoretical in tone. ⎯ Michel Foucault and Roland Barthes’s main argument center on the figure of the author and attempt to deconstruct the vision of the author as
Premium Philosophy Mind Literature
According to an argument in BBC‚ it states that‚ “Scientists experiment on animals for a host of different reasons‚ including basic research to explore how organisms function‚ investigating potential treatments for human disease‚ and safety and quality control testing of drugs‚ devices and other products. Its proponents point to the long list of medical advances made possible with the help of animal research” (Katsnelson). I believe that this first argument is the strongest because it offers several
Premium Science Research Experiment
Ontological Argument Video When someone say a possible world they mean as hypothetical situation. It is generally a way for philosophers to test an idea to see if it is logically by asking could it exists in a possible world like our own.Three ways entities are defined in ontological argument are impossible it’s an entity that exists in no possible worlds‚ contingent an entity that exists in some possible worlds. God is defined as a maximally great being which means love‚wisdom‚ and power. The lesser
Premium God Existence Problem of evil
Discuss Girard’s argument that violence is at the core of every religion and examine the scapegoat theory Around the world violence and war are being carried out in the name of religion‚ not just in today’s society but throughout history. René Girard argues that violence is at the core of every religion‚ and by the ways that the media portray religious conflict could lead many people to agree. This essay will be explaining his argument and examining the key points‚ in order to understand his view
Premium Blame Victimisation Religion
unrest regarding the government’s denial of the right to marry for homosexuals. Plenty of conservatives are completely against gay marriage; and many of liberals are fighting for equal treatment. The neo-Christian politicians are using religious arguments to establish that homosexuality is an abomination. While this may be their belief system‚ this country was founded on religious freedom‚ where the people are allowed to worship how they see fit. These two polarized views have created gay marriage
Premium Homosexuality Marriage Same-sex marriage
latter part of Descartes proposition namely ‘that is a mind‚ soul‚ understanding or reason’ (Ibid‚ 2000); conceiving it to be erroneous; for it ostensibly reads ‘I am thinking‚ therefore I am a thought’. This is condemned by Hobbes as a spurious argument for it does not seem logical to say a thinking thing equates its faculty of thinking. Nor is it logical to say ‘I understand‚ therefore I am an understanding’ (Ibid‚ 2000). Surely rather from Hobbes’ point of view‚ it is efficacious to contend ‘I
Premium Mind Concepts in metaphysics Cognition
rights of potential persons and that there should be no restrictions on when an abortion must occur by. Her argument is a direct response to Noonan’s thesis which is that fetuses are humans and therefore have human rights. Noonan argues that “it is wrong to kill innocent human beings and fetuses are innocent human beings‚ then it is wrong to kill fetuses” (Warren‚ 338).
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Morality
paper‚ Carson points out 4 main arguments that we can derive from the recent corporate scandals (e.g. Enron‚ WorldCom). The arguments pointed out revolve around the flaws and inadequacy in current business approaches such as the stakeholder theory‚ shareholder theory and incentives system in corporations currently. In my response paper‚ I will make use of ethical theories such as Kantian ethics‚ Utilitarianism‚ Rawl’s theory of justice etc. to analyse the arguments made in the paper and to evaluate
Premium Business ethics Management Ethics