from 20-23 weeks do not feel pain” [6] - whereas abortions mostly occur before that time period [3]. In conclusion‚ since the legal abortions are performed by a professional and the benefits outweigh the costs‚ abortion is morally permissible. Against Abortion (kantian): Killing an innocent human life form is wrong. The fetus is an innocent human life form‚ therefore it is wrong to abort the fetus [1]. According to the Women ’s Center statistics‚ teenagers are more likely to delay having an abortion
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Human
because they believe that it will humanize and torture the animals. It may be true that it’s unethical and it goes against people’s morals‚ but it is a great medical advancement that could help save many lives. Furthermore‚ people should rethink their decision on trying to ban chimeric research. Therefore‚ the audience‚ organizations such as the NIH who have withdrawn or are against funding‚ will be persuaded to support and continue or start funding the chimeric research. Research has shown that
Premium Human Science Hominidae
Against One of the arguments against legalization of drugs is what we have all grown up hearing which is “drugs are bad”. This reason has been said throughout most of our life and is what we learn in schools. However‚ legal drugs like alcohol and tobacco have caused more harm than illegal drugs. Another argument against legalization is that it would send mix signals to children. Drugs are bad and “just say no” have been sayings we have all learned growing up. However‚ if drugs were suddenly legal
Premium Drug addiction Drug Heroin
Universal healthcare is a heavily debated topic‚ and there are strong arguments both for it and against it. "I’m An American Doctor‚ And I’m Against Universal Health Care" by Dr. Kalpana DePasquale is an editorial that provides many arguments against the idea the U.S. should have healthcare similar to Canada. "Universal health Care was the Centennial Generation’s Greatest Achievement" by The Globe and Mail is an editorial in favor of universal healthcare‚ and compares the system in Canada to the
Premium Health care Medicine Universal health care
even an unborn human being‚ the mother is treating that life as a means to an end for herself‚ not as an end in itself. The killing of that human being is a means to an end for the happiness or convenience of the mother or her family. The other argument from the deontology position would be the fulfillment of duty. The mother has a duty to nurture her child while in the womb. The mother has a duty to
Premium Pregnancy Abortion Childbirth
become significantly more popular with the advancement of neuroscience. As Papineau highlights “we find it very difficult to absorb this lesson” (Papineau 2010: 5). One argument against this belief is the ‘philosophical zombies argument’ which purports to cause problems for reductive physicalism. In this essay‚ I will argue against this counterargument. Reductive physicalism tries to solve the what Chalmers calls‚ “the hard problem of consciousness” (Chalmers 2010). This tries to answer the question
Premium Philosophy of mind Mind Dualism
at large (Cooper et al. 2010). Evidence Based Arguments against Mandatory HPV Vaccination Childhood immunizations‚ such as measles‚ chicken pox‚ and polio‚ are mandatory for school-aged youth and are required because of their highly contagious nature‚ especially in settings where people congregate in large numbers (De Jong and Bouma‚ 2001). Therefore‚ parents question whether there is justification for mandating that children be vaccinated against a sexually transmitted virus‚ one that can only
Premium Human papillomavirus HPV vaccine Cervical cancer
cannot be altruistic‚ the idea that humans can have an ulterior motive‚ as it is just simply human nature. The Expected Benefit argument claims that only self-interest motivates human action. I believe that Psychological Egoism‚ is a true theory that holds strong arguments as to why‚ all human actions are motivated by self-interest‚ because whatever argument is made against this theory can always be refuted back to the idea that any action that
Premium Egoism Ethical egoism Individualism
censorship. There are two sides to the pornography argument‚ those for censorship and those against censorship. I find that censorship‚ or the anti-pornography argument is stronger‚ however‚ I will justly lay down each side of the argument appropriately. Pornography can be defined as “sexually explicit words or images intended to provoke sexual arousal” and will be used in this context for both sides of the argument. The anti-pornography argument says that pornography is immoral because it is offensive
Premium Sexual intercourse Human sexual behavior Human sexuality
certain of our actions as humans are necessarily right or wrong. What would happen if we say two contradictory statements can’t coexist as Aristotle demonstrated? Through the law of non-contradiction from Aristotle and ethical absolutism‚ I will argue against ethical relativism. In ethical absolutism‚ there is only one answer on certain human actions‚ following an objective moral code. According to absolutists‚ this code has been the same ever since humans have existed. Logically‚ this code applies to
Premium Morality Ethics Relativism