side with the second opposing argument. The first argument talks about theoretical things that can never happen. Instead‚ the second argument talks about a real solution to the problem. The solution to “ boost the defensive capacities of prospective victims.” This is more realistic in my opinion. They both talk about how it is inevitable and how there is basically nothing we can do to stop someone from killing people if they really want to. If I were to add to each argument I strongly add upon the statement
Premium Firearm Gun politics in the United States United States
8 million animals die in painful experiment each year. 10% of these animals die without painkiller. Animals are used to test new products to make sure new products are safe for human use. Researchers use animals to test damage to the body. A toxicology report is given: How much drug is absorbed into the blood How the medical product is broken down chemically in the human body Toxicity of product How quickly product is excreted New materials require a biocompatibility testing in animal. The FDA regulates
Premium Science Suffering Experiment
Standardized tests argument Have you ever thought you were taking to many tests? If you do it is because of the standardized tests. Some people think we test too much in schools. Other people think there is not enough tests or we need to keep the tests the same. I think standardized test should change because they are to much money‚ the tests are so long‚ and there is a lot of tests in school. The first piece of evidence I have is there are to many standardized tests and the tests are to long
Premium Education Standardized test Teacher
For instance their studies have shown that although around 20‚000 drug offenders have been sentenced to mandatory minimums in Massachusetts alone‚ rate of drug abuse and addiction has not declined. Their argument stands that if mandatory minimum sentences are repealed then that drug offenders should be sentenced like any other case in which someone breaks a law. A judge should look at the person’s criminal history‚ their involvement and severity of the crime
Premium Crime
whether it is possible to confirm the hypothesis that “all ravens are black” by observing positive instances of this claim or‚ in other words‚ by citing anything that is a “non-black non-raven” as support for the claim. Popper sees no logic in this argument‚ asserting that it is impossible to falsify the hypothesis that all ravens are black if one is not actively seeking non-black ravens. Merely identifying non-black non-raven objects‚ such as white shoes or green apples‚ serves only to eliminate said
Premium Logic Inductive reasoning Scientific method
Anti-federalists believed in the new constitution obtaining such power can lead to infringement of civil rights by wealthy Americans. For instance‚ wealthy Americans lobbying the government for certain laws to pass against the middle and lower class. Even though Henry failed to convince the government to reject the new constitution‚ Henry opened the eyes of Federalists. According to Patrick Henry‚ “They not foresee latent consequences: I dread the operation of it on
Premium United States Native Americans in the United States Articles of Confederation
started to award a higher degree of protection to commercial speech with passing time (explain how I agree with the court’s higher protection and why). [THESIS IS A WORK IN PROGRESS BUT MORE OR LESS THIS IS THE THESIS IDEA]. Introduction: To prove my argument I will be starting out with the history of how Supreme Court
Premium Supreme Court of the United States First Amendment to the United States Constitution Law
Therefore‚ the war in Vietnam is for Americans to protect their free capitalist ideology. He concludes that “For when freedom is destroyed in one country‚ it is threatened throughout the world” (RAP 29-1). This statement was one of the most notable arguments that was meant to legitimize what is happening in the Vietnam. However‚ in reality‚ it was questionable whether the United States really needed to fight in the Vietnam or not.
Premium Vietnam War Cold War United States
Three strikes laws have been the subject of extensive debate over whether they are effective. Defendants sentenced to long prison terms under these laws have also sought to challenge these laws as unconstitutional. For instance‚ one defendant was found guilty of stealing $150 worth of video tapes from two California department stores. The defendant had prior convictions‚ and pursuant to California’s three-strike laws‚ the judge sentenced the defendant to 50 years in prison for the theft of the video
Premium Criminal law Crime Criminal justice
In philosophical literature‚ Marquis argued that abortion was/is immoral‚ except only in rare exceptions‚ but more importantly he noted that prochoice and anti-abortion arguments cannot be symmetric thus making discussion on the topic quite a conundrum. Marquis purported the arguments of anti-abortionist‚ who asserted and believed that life is present at or from the moment of conception‚ and that fetuses look like babies‚ possess genetic code‚ and are therefore in possession of the qualities and
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Fetus