Imitative Art A Comparison of the Philosophies of Plato & Aristotle And the Ultimate Beneficial Nature of the Tragic Drama By: Stephanie Cimino In the various discussions of imitative art there has been a notable disagreement between two distinguished philosophers; Plato and Aristotle. Although it was Plato who first discussed the concept of imitative art‚ it is my belief that Aristotle was justified in his praise and admiration of imitative art‚ specifically‚ the tragic drama
Premium Tragedy Poetics
Affirmative essay Aristotle and Socrates and Plato’s beliefs have similarities mainly evident in their denouncement of democracy for the state. The views of Socrates expressed and written by his pupil Plato are vastly philosophical in nature and he promotes the idea of questioning life to achieve insight. The philosophers who possess the absolute truth are the best equipped to rule society according to Plato and his Allegory of the Cave. Conversely‚ Aristotle takes a more political science approach
Premium Political philosophy Aristotle Politics
that is worthy of significant focus‚ is it a virtue? Or is it merely one of our human faculties that we employ in order to avoid vice? Aristotle’s theory Regarding the idea that ‘virtue is the mean’ we must first distinguish the intellectual virtues from the moral virtues‚ as it is only the latter type of virtue to which the idea applies. Employing our rational functions appropriately will‚ according to Aristotle‚ result in the engendering of the various types of intellectual virtues: theoretical
Premium Virtue Ethics Nicomachean Ethics
second book of The Politics‚ Aristotle digresses from Plato’s recommendations and provides a counter framework for what he believes is an ideal state. The best ideal state according to Aristotle is one that is not ruled by philosopher kings. This main feature of rulership is what distances Aristotle from Plato. Is it natural for there to be a group of philosophers ruling? Is it natural that these philosophers must be removed from private life? These are the questions Aristotle deals with in the second
Free Aristotle Political philosophy
Aristole on wealth • What human beings want is to increase wealth with no limit and to maintain their store of money. They are so occupied with life that they want to live it‚ not live it well. And since their appetite for life is unlimited‚ they also want an unlimited amount of what sustains it. And those who do aim at living well seek what promotes physical gratification. So‚ since this too seems to depend on having property‚ they spend all their time acquiring wealth. And the second kind
Premium Constitution Woman United States Constitution
Book II of the work‚ Aristotle distinguishes between moral virtues‚ which are learned through habit and practice‚ and intellectual virtues‚ which are learned through instruction. However‚ it is not until later in Book II that Aristotle actually defines virtue. He opens Chapter 5 with‚ "Next we must consider what virtue is" (35) and at its end asserts that virtue is a state of character. Therefore‚ the conclusion of the whole argument is: Virtue is a state of character. Aristotle first makes the following
Premium Plato Ethics Virtue
Aristotle VS. Plato Epistemology‚ “theory of knowledge”‚ is the logic of getting to the metaphysics. Ontology‚ “theory of being”‚ is the very distinct part of metaphysics‚ where definitional divisions appear even larger than in metaphysics itself. “Ontos”‚ a Greek word‚ which means “being” and “episteme”‚ is a Greek word‚ which means “knowledge” of the highest‚ most reliable and certain kind. For Plato‚ there exist two worlds: the ever changing material world and the eternal world of Forms
Free Aristotle Causality Ontology
In the perspective of virtue Aristotle and Confucianism are similar because both talked about the virtue is a way to guiding humanity. Aristotle have to do with more action‚ that pertains to human good not what is right. Aristotle ethical system is mostly based off of common sense‚ and moral judgment. Confucianism is build off of cardinal relationships to help elucidate the family social rules and promote social harmony. In the book it states that as a husband‚ he is responsible of taking care of
Premium Religion Confucianism Confucius
In the reading Nicomachean Ethics‚ by Aristotle‚ a well-known philosopher‚ wrote about what it is to be a good person and how being a good person‚ reflects our happiness. Along with writing by Aristotle‚ there was another writing by Immanuel Kant‚ called The Foundations of the Metaphysics of morals‚ that’s rights about the fundamentals of the moral duty. These two philosophers were very good and can very well go well with each other. Aristotle and Immanuel Kant can agree that‚ to be a moral person
Premium Ethics Morality Immanuel Kant
cause- the purpose of the thing. Virtue is not just for humans; it means that everything that exists has a purpose. The Golden Mean-is an action or feeling that corresponds to a particular situation at the right time‚ in the right way‚ in the right amount‚ and for the right reason. Not too much‚ not too little‚ everything in moderation. It is what is “Good for man” where a human can excel‚ what a human is meant to do and where a human will find happiness. He determined that if we are able to
Premium Aristotle Ethics Virtue