Essay 1 An interview is a planned questioning of a witness‚ victim‚ or any other person that may have information related to a case of incident. When interviewing officers should use open ended questions to obtain facts important to their case. In order for an officer to be a good interviewer they should be able to build rapport with people. This means that the officer needs to give and receive trust and respect. During an interview the officer tries to develop behavioral and investigative information
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Interview Miranda v. Arizona
Fifth Amendment The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides‚ "No person shall be held to answer for a capital‚ or otherwise infamous crime‚ unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury‚ except in cases arising in the land or naval forces‚ or in the militia‚ when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself‚
Premium United States Constitution Miranda v. Arizona Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
The Arizona law SB 1070 related to immigration is discriminating The Arizona law was proposed and signed by the Governor of Arizona Jane Brewer in April of 2010. Its aim is to identify‚ prosecute and deport illegal immigrants: it stipulates that every immigrant must carry immigration documents to guarantee that they are staying in the country legally‚ gives the police the power to ask for this documents to anyone they think could be in Arizona without authorization and allows people to sue local
Premium Immigration Population Immigration to the United States
University Between 1954 and 1956 the senior author of this article carried out a detailed social and economic study of the community of Shonto‚ situated in what was then a particularly remote corner of the Navajo Indian Reservation in northeastern Arizona. In 1972 the junior author returned to d o a restudy of the same community. A comparison of the data obtained in the two studiesprovides unique measures of social and economic change‚ and also of social and economic persistence‚ during a period of
Premium Marriage New Mexico World population
A. Interrogations‚ Confessions‚ and Non-testimonial Evidence 1. The Exclusionary Rule: The principle based on federal Constitutional Law that evidence illegally seized by law enforcement officers in violation of a suspect’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures cannot be used against the suspect in a criminal prosecution. The exclusionary rule is designed to exclude evidence obtained in violation of a criminal defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights. The Fourth Amendment protects
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Mapp v. Ohio‚ 367 U.S. 643 (1991) Facts: Police received information that a bombing suspect and evidence of bombing were at Ms. Mapp’s home. Ms. Mapp refused to admit the police officers after calling her attorney and being instructed that they should have a warrant. After an unsuccessful initial attempt to gain entrance into her home‚ the police returned and pried open the door and broke a window to gain entrance. Ms. Mapp was only halfway down the stairs by time the officers had entered
Premium United States Constitution Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
The U.S. Supreme Court has recognized two constitutional sources of the right to counsel during interrogation. One source is the Court’s interpretation in Miranda v. Arizona of the Fifth Amendment right against compelled self-incrimination; the other is contained within the language of the Sixth Amendment. Because the protections afforded individuals under these constitutional provisions differ‚ it is critical that law enforcement officers understand the provisions and appropriately apply their protections
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution
Miranda v. Arizona “You are going to prison”‚ is the statement Ernesto Miranda probably heard as he was arrested by police from the comfort of his home‚ in 1963‚ without warning or being advised of his Fifth Amendment rights. Miranda‚ 22 years old‚ was charged with raping an 18-year-old female. Subsequently‚ he was brought to a police department station where he was placed into an interrogation room isolated from everyone. After two grueling hours of questioning; Miranda was feeling dazed‚ confused
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court of the United States Law
The title of the story was This Is What It Means To Say Phoenix‚ Arizona was written by Sherman J. Alexie. The main character of the story was Victor‚ an employee of Indian Affairs‚ who lost his job same day his father died and his friend named Thomas‚ a childhood friend he meet after years. In the starting of the story Victor and his mom are not financially stable and Thomas helps him with the money. Thomas said‚ “I can lend you the money you need” (Line 24‚ Page 276)‚ this clarify that Thomas and
Premium Short story English-language films Fiction
because “Before questioning‚ the police must first advise the suspect of his constitutional rights (also called “Miranda Warnings”)” (Missouri Protection & Advocacy Services‚ 2004). This process was set into place because of the case Miranda vs Arizona. Miranda had been taken into custody and questioned by the police without any legal protection. Ernesto Miranda had been accused of a rap-kidnapping charge and had been
Premium Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution Miranda v. Arizona United States Constitution