Business Ethics Decision-Making Cases Write-ups Arthur Andersen: Questionable Accounting Practices Name: Wen Jiangshan Student ID:2011008274 Part I. Summary of the case Case 2 mainly introduces how Arthur Andersen‚ who used to be one of the “Big Five” largest accounting firms in the United States‚ strayed away from accepted policies and stuck in a string of accounting scandals‚ finally closed its doors after 90 years of business. The firm’s name was synonymous with
Premium Audit Enron Business ethics
questions about the viability of these contracts and their associated costs. Author Andersen provided both consulting and auditing services which created an inherent conflict of interest. On one hand‚ Andersen was auditing an Enron financial recording system and strategy based for the most part on the advice of its own consultants. Evidence eventually surfaced that some internal conflicts had arisen within Andersen about some of the “aggressive” accounting practices introduces by the Chief Financial
Premium Enron Enron scandal
Running head: Management Planning Paper on Arthur Andersen Management Planning Paper on Arthur Andersen In 1913‚ the company Arthur Andersen started by Arthur Andersen and Clarence Delany by the name of Andersen‚ Delany‚ & Co. In 1918‚ it was given the name Arthur Andersen & Co. The company supplied tax‚ consulting services and auditing for the large business‚ and itself had a position in the "Big Five" accounting firms. In 2002‚ this firm was found guilty for auditing an energy corporation
Premium Corporation Social responsibility Arthur Andersen
Arthur Andersen: Questionable Accounting Practices Arthur Andersen LLP was founded in Chicago in 1913 by Arthur Andersen and partner Clarence DeLany. After 90 years of hard work‚ this accounting firm we become known as one of the Big Five largest accounting firms in the United States. Andersen set standards for the accounting profession and advanced new initiatives on the strength of its then undeniable integrity. By the 1980s‚ standards throughout the industry fell as accountancy firms struggled
Premium Arthur Andersen Big Four auditors Enron
March 4‚ 2014 Rise & Fall of Arthur Andersen‚ LLP Abstract Enron was a natural gas company that was formed in 1985 by Kenneth Lay. By 1992‚ Enron was the largest selling company of natural gas in North America. In October 2001 a scandal involving Enron was emerging. This scandal led to the fall of the company. The Enron case and many others cases led to the collapse of other companies that did business with them which included one of the largest accounting
Premium Enron Arthur Andersen Accounting scandals
Valentina Nozdrina COM 3150 Prof. S. Reynolds December 10‚ 2012 Arthur Andersen LLP case study The case “Arthur Andersen‚ LLP: An Accounting Firm in Crisis” explains the failure of Arthur Andersen‚ one of the leading auditing and consulting firms in the world‚ known for professionalism in its field‚ ethical values‚ honest accounting and the elimination of conflicts. Andersen was always focused on creating a firm with its own set of business standards. For many years‚ Andersen’s slogan was
Premium Arthur Andersen Enron
IN DEPENDENCE OF AUDITOR – ENRON AND ARTHUR ANDERSEN CASE Introduction The world economy in recent years has got some significant growth but also had quite serious scandals. They caused the shakes for many‚ both citizens and authorities. Therefore‚ it is a challenging time and it is the time for change. An absolutely necessity is to enhance the true reliable financial information because the success on the capital market depends on it. The key factor is to assure that auditors must take a completely
Premium Enron Audit Internal control
AUDIT MANAGEMENT | | | |(Topic: Internal Control & Related Aspects) | | | |
Premium Internal control
Like most business professions‚ there has to be a strong sense of ethics and responsibility. Especially professions like law or public accounting. They must have strong standards of integrity. In public accounting‚ people rely heavily on the information being provided on companies. Any mistakes or intentional cover up will have high costs to the economy and dire consequences. Even though there are laws and standards that regulate auditing‚ it does not completely stop or prevent firms from doing
Premium Audit Enron Auditing
Internal Control Definition Internal control is broadly defined as a process‚ effected by an entity’s board of trustees‚ management‚ and other personnel‚ designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives in the following categories: 1. Effectiveness and efficiency of operations 2. Reliability of financial reporting 3. Compliance with applicable laws and regulations 4. Safeguarding of assets Internal control consists of five interrelated components:
Premium Internal control