ABOUT JAHARA RADZI & PARTNERS Jahara Radzi & Partners (The Firm) is a Bumiputra-headed legal practice founded by Encik Md Radzi Zainal Abidin and Dato’ Jahara binti Hamid. The concise information of the firm are as follows:- The Firm The Firm was previously known as Messrs Jahara Radzi & May Chan. Partners & Legal Assistants Four (4) Partners and three (3) Legal Assistants. The respective experiences of the Partners and Legal Assistants are as per profile of each of them below. Offices
Premium Penang
Discuss similarities and differences in partner violence by males and females. Consider prevalence‚ reasons‚ type‚ consequences and developmental course. During adolescent years romantic relationships begin to become important and take up a significant portion of time (Richards‚ Crowe‚ Larson & Swarr‚ 1998). These early experiences of romantic relationships can serve many positive functions such as larger peer networks‚ more opposite-sex friends‚ and more non-school friends (Connolly &
Free Violence Domestic violence Violence against women
CASE ANALYSIS #1: McDonald’s “Seniors” Restaurant In the study of the briefing of the McDonald’s Restaurant‚ there are positives to the problem and negatives towards the problem. A McDonald’s in a city crowded with seniors are overwhelmed with senior customers during the early hours of the day. The senior come in as a meeting area where they eat and commune at the restaurant. The number of seniors that come in‚ crowds the dining area in which customers come in and eat. They come in on the
Premium Food Restaurant Eating
The man should be the dominant partner in the marriage 13th September 2012 There are two main Christian views towards roles in marriage. There is the traditional view‚ and the modern view. Traditionalists‚ fundamentally say that men should always be dominant in marriage‚ whereas‚ the modernist view is centred on both partners being equal. The traditional view held by Christians is that men should be the dominant partner and that they should go out to work to pay for the family‚ while the wife
Premium God Female Gender role
Chapter 9 Case Analysis 1 &3 1.What arguments did the defendant make that the lawful search was connected to the unlawful search and thus was “ tainted”? Do you agree with the argument? ( United States v. Jenkins) The argument that the defendant had was that the affidavit for Room 127‚ when examined without the tainted information‚ is a “bare bones” affidavit that does not indicate “a ‘fair probability’ that evidence of a crime will be located on the premises of the proposed search. I disagree
Premium Police Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Evidence law
short term from long term problems Conclude with the decision facing the manager/key person III. Causes of the problem Provide a detailed analysis of the problems identified in the statement of the problem In the analysis‚ apply theories and models from the next/or readings Support conclusions and/or assumptions with specific references to the case and or the readings IV. Decision Criteria and Alternative Solutions‚ Implementations and Justifications Identify criteria against which you
Premium Typography Term Problem solving
Institute University Bhopal Project on Family Law-I Topic: Analysis of “Aysha v. Ozir Hassan” (2013) 5 MLJ 31 Justice C.S. Karnan Submitted by: Richa Arya 2012 BA.LLB. 30 Table of Contents Contents Facts The petitioner filed a maintenance Case in M.C. No. 64 of 2000‚ on the file of Family Court‚ Coimbatore
Premium Marriage
DATE: APRIL 23‚ 2014 RE: Sample FIRAC Case Analysis 1 Case Analysis 1 Facts: Bob is a business law student; Bob insults his professor Marvin; Marvin pulls out his 38-revolver and fires a shot at Bob; The shot misses Bob; It strikes another student named Cathy; Cathy did not see the shot coming and she never knew that it was the shot that hit her; Bob and Cathy sues Marvin; Marvin gets sued for assault and battery. Issue: The purpose of this case is to know whether Bob and Cathy can
Premium Tort Battery Legal terms
e analysis CASE ANALYSIS I. CASE TITLE: Confil Employees Union II. TIME CONTEXT: Year in 1987 III. VIEWPOINT: Labor – Management Relations IV. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEMS: The problems are there is no written code of ethics‚ miscommunication so the supervisors now having favoritism to those workers can speak their language Chinese‚ no proper qualification for promotion‚ and last the HR Manager can’t lead or handle the management. V. OBJECTIVES: Identify the misconceptions between the management
Premium Trade union Management Problem solving
CASE 10: SAN MIGUEL CORPORATION AND A. SORIANO CORPORATION I. PROBLEM How do San Miguel Corporation and A. Soriano Corporation will meet their satisfied ability to respond to the rapid changes in the environment around them if they will not upgrade their planning capability? II. AREAS OF CONSIDERATION 1. Difficult to achieve the objective of the company. 2. Difficult to foresee the opportunity and constraints of the future. 3. Difficult
Premium Forecasting Future Planning