1 PART I: INTRO Context of Admin Law: Anglo-Canadian Constitutional History Definition of Admin Law as discussed in class “admin law is about ppl getting screwed by gvt” power is exercised by public officials – esp exec (statute‚ or royal prerog) Admin is control of that power o Creates legal parameters – from cml‚ statute‚ constitution Created by Cts (supervise)‚ legislature (who delegate)‚ and agencies themselves (use delegated power) Admin law also provides for relief‚ where
Premium Law Case law Common law
Toyota: Sudden Acceleration or Bad Drivers or Pesky Floor Mats? Introduction and History of SUA Audi barely survived its sudden-acceleration problem in the 1980s‚ When about 1‚000 Audi 5000 owner said their cars were suddenly accelerating. Audi would issue five recalls on the cars before it and the National Highway Safety Traffic Administration (NHSTA) were able to conclude that it was driver error‚ the accidental placement of the foot on the accelerator instead of the brake. However‚ there
Premium Toyota Audi Ethics
Case brief for maneka Gandhi Date of judgment-25/01/1978 Bench: BEG‚ M. HAMEEDULLAH (CJ)‚ CHANDRACHUD‚ Y.V‚ BHAGWATI‚ P.N.‚ KRISHNAIYER‚ V.R.‚ UNTWALIA‚ N.L.‚ FAZALALI‚ SYED MURTAZA‚ KAILASAM‚ P.S. (7 judges) Citation: 1978 SCC (1) 248 The factual summary of Maneka Gandhi case is as follows; Maneka Gandhi was issued a passport on 1/06/1976 under the Passport Act 1967. The regional passport officer ‚ New Delhi issued a letter dated 2/7/1977 addressed to Maneka Gandhi ‚ in which she was asked
Free United States Constitution Human rights Freedom of speech
Administrative Law deals with the powers of the administrative authorities‚ provides legal boundaries the manner in which the powers are exercised and the remedies which are available to the aggrieved persons‚ when those powers are abused by those authorities or when they refuses to perform their duties .The doctrine of legitimate expectation is relatively new concept which gained standing after it was introduced Ridge v Baldwin and fashioned by Courts for the review of administrative action. In
Premium Law Common law Contract
CHAPTER – 1 GROUNDS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW INTRODUCTION “Public law is not at base about rights‚ even though abuses of power may and often do invade private rights; it is about wrongs – that is to say misuses of public power.” * Sedley.J1 The ultimate (though not necessarily the most appropriate) means by which public law disputes are resolved is by bringing the matter before the Administrative Court using a claim for judicial review. Broadly‚ in order to succeed‚ the claimant (the person or body
Premium Administrative law Human rights Decision making
JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION PART II ON WHAT GROUNDS CAN JUDICIAL REVIEW BE SOUGHT? The grounds for JR can be classified in at least three ways: 1. Two principal classes of action may be pursued under JR: those which allege that there has been a breach of statutory requirements‚ and those alleging that action has been taken in disregard of the rules of ‘natural justice’. 2. In Council for the Civil Service Unions v Minister of State for the
Premium Human rights Law Administrative law
motivação e liderança serão abordados em conceitos e teorias‚ exemplificando como atuar e gerar a motivação através das recompensas‚ o papel do líder na geração da motivação entre empresa e empregado. Os planos de benefícios são apresentados desde suas origens até seus objetivos‚ passando pela importância de serem aplicados nas organizações. Palavras-chave: Motivação. Administradores. Recompensa. Estímulo. Organização. MOTIVATION IN THE WORK Abstract:- This article argues the use of the theories
Premium
BY IGATA‚ CLEMENT CHINEDU Table of Cases Anisminic Ltd V Foreign Compensation Commission (1969) 2 AC 147‚ (1969) 2 WLR 163....................................................................................................1 Craig v The State of South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 at 179.....................11 Ridge v Baldwin (1961) 2 All E.R. 523: (1961) 2 WLR 1054………………….6 R. V. Northumberland Compensation Appeal Tribunal‚ ex P. Shaw (1951) 1 K.B. 711: (1952) 1 K.B. 338…………………………………………………...13
Premium Court Judge Jury
JUSTICE V. R. KRISHNA IYER AND EXPANSIVE INTERPRETATION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AUTHORED BY:SHAILESH KUMAR‚ ROLL NO. 262‚ 9TH SEMESTER‚ 5 TH YEAR ‚ CHANAKYA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY‚ NYAYA NAGAR‚ M ITHAPUR ‚ PATNA - 800001. E-MAIL ID : shailesh.baranwal@gmail.com LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ABBREVIATION FULL FORM A.C. AIR C.J. CJI CriLJ J. LLJ p. Para pp. SC SCC UOI vol. Appealed Cases All India Reporter Chief Justice Chief Justice of India Criminal Law Journal Judge Labour Law Journal
Premium Law Supreme Court of the United States Court
19 1. Introdução O tema deste ensaio é o mal-estar no trabalho. Numa altura em que as preocupações ecológicas tornaram-se‚ finalmente‚ preponderantes‚ a questão da saúde física e mental no trabalho‚ do ambiente dos assalariados no quadro da sua actividade‚ permanece curiosamente muito acessória no debate público e político. Face aos riscos psicossociais daí decorrentes‚ as respostas habituais das grandes organizações limitam-se à criação de células psicológicas ou linhas verdes de apoio. Como
Premium