Autonomy Vs. Paternalism In Mental Health Treatment The assignment for this Ethics class was to review Mr. Jacob ’s treatment‚ as described by the New York State Commission on Quality of Care for the Mentally disabled (1994). The class was further asked to comment on the major issues for each of the three perspectives. The agencies‚ family and review board were to be included. This student will begin with a fourth perspective; that of Mr. Gordon. In the Matter of Jacob Gordon (1994)
Premium Mental disorder Mental illness Disability
disadvantages on autonomy and paternalism. Decision-making would be so much easier if we all maintained our autonomy in making the decision‚ however‚ because our decisions do not always abide by autonomistic values paternalistic intervention must occur. The purpose of autonomy is to allow us to choose to do things that affect only ourselves and does not negatively affect those around us. Unfortunately‚ many choices do‚ whether we know it or not‚ involve those in our environment. Paternalism is in place
Premium Choice Smoking Addiction
the conflict of Autonomy and informed consent versus Paternalism and the doctor’s intervention. In one hand‚ Autonomy is the principle of non-interference and the right to self-governance; informed consent is the concept that "Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body (102)" it is the exercise of a choice after being informed of the process and risks of a medical treatment. While in the other hand lies Paternalism; "the interference
Premium Patient Informed consent Medicine
Paternalism vs. informed consent Paternalism is the practice of acting as the “parent‚” which is taking it upon oneself to make decisions for the patient. Years ago the “doctor knows best” approach regarding treatment was common. The doctor merely picked a course of treatment he or she thought was best for the patient. Of course‚ paternalism is not acceptable today because it eliminates patients’ right to choose the treatment they feel is right for them‚ even if their choice is not what the doctor
Premium Autonomy Dentistry Informed consent
Medical Paternalism or Patient Autonomy Elizabeth Russell D’ Youville College PHI: 312 Bioethics Julie Kirsch October 29‚ 2014 A common and controversial issue facing many medical professionals is medical paternalism versus patient autonomy. At the heart of every practitioner/patient relationship is trust‚ and the duty to uphold the patient’s best interest both ethically and privately. These foundations seem basic on the surface‚ but underneath lies a much more complex issue. Medical paternalism
Premium Medicine Patient Physician
Medical Paternalism or Patient Autonomy At issue in the controversy over medical paternalism is the problem of patient autonomy. Medical paternalism can be defined as interfering with a patient’s freedom for his or her own well-being; patient autonomy means being able to act and make a decision intentionally‚ with understanding‚ and without controlling influences (Munson‚ 38 & 39). The principle of informed consent has come to be essential to any philosophical analysis of the tension between
Premium Autonomy Informed consent Suffering
A picture‚ they say‚ is worth a thousand words. This is especially true in the treatment of mental health patients. For patients unable to adequately express their feelings verbally‚ the best approach is to allow them to speak through their art. This is especially true of children who often have problems talking about their painful experiences. Art therapy is a form of psychotherapy. Through the use of artistic expressions and other diagnostic procedures‚ doctors will be able to more accurately
Premium Art Therapy Medicine
Autonomy/Heteronomy/Free Will/Classical Conditioning: What does each individually and holistically argue? And how‚ if possible‚ can they be related? What does it mean fundamentally to us as human? Kant argues that we as human beings have pure practical reason‚ to which he means that we are able to construct rationality from various thought processes an act accordingly given those measures because we are persons capable and worthy of respect. According to Kant we own ourselves and by being autonomous
Premium Philosophy Immanuel Kant Categorical imperative
As mental health nurses‚ we are granted a seemingly disproportionate power and latitude to practise when compared to our colleagues in general nursing. This is due to a number of factors; firstly‚ that mental illness is difficult to define‚ in the eyes of the public it constitutes an intangible wrongness about an individual that cannot be measured or even seen clearly. Due to misrepresentation and scaremongering by the media‚ mental health services are often viewed as taking the role of protecting
Premium Health care Psychiatry Mental health
people living with mental health problems involve human rights. However‚ there is little information available about human rights and how they relate to mental health. Too often‚ a person may not realise that they are able to do something about their situation‚ or even that there is something wrong with the way they are being treated. It is therefore vital that people living with mental health problems are able to access information about their human rights and challenge bad treatment. {BIHR‚ 2006‚ P
Premium Human rights Mental disorder