QoS Enhancement and Performance Evaluation of Ad-hoc Routing Protocols for Rural Public Safety Chad Bohannan‚ Li Zhang‚ Jian Tang‚ Richard S. Wolff‚ Shen Wan‚ Neeraj Gurdasani and Doug Galarus Abstract—In this paper‚ we explore the feasibility of using Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANETs) for rural public safety. First‚ we discuss a QoS enhancement to a standard routing protocol‚ Dynamic Source Routing (DSR). By incorporating a new routing metric and the available bandwidth and delay estimation algorithms
Premium Routing protocol Routing
CHAPTER 10 DETERMINING HOW COSTS BEHAVE 10-16 (10 min.) Estimating a cost function. 1. Slope coefficient = = = = $0.35 per machine-hour Constant = Total cost – (Slope coefficient Quantity of cost driver) = $5‚400 – ($0.35 10‚000) = $1‚900 = $4‚000 – ($0.35 6‚000) = $1‚900 The cost function based on the two observations is Maintenance costs = $1‚900 + $0.35 Machine-hours 2. The cost function in requirement
Premium Variable cost Regression analysis Costs
“Auerbach Enterprises uses machine hours as the cost driver to assign overhead costs to the air conditioners. The company has used a company-wide predetermined overhead rate in past years‚ but the new controller‚ Bennie Leon‚ is considering the use of departmental overhead rates beginning with the next year. “(Schneider‚ 2012). One product is affected more than the other by use of departmental rates rather than companywide rate. “Companies can choose to use the accounting job order costing method
Premium Costs Cost Variable cost
Coordination Meeting‚ U.S. Department of Energy‚ Office of Transportation Technologies‚ Washington‚ D.C. ANL 2.00 1.50 Borroni-Bird 2.05 1.56 EEA 2.14 1.56 EEA Methodology Share of Cost Contributor or Category MSRP (%) 50.0 Vehicle Manufacturing 17.0 Overhead 7.0 23.5 Selling 97.5 Sum of Costs 2.5 Profit 100.0 RPE Share of RPE (%) 46.9 22.1 22.9 91.9 8.1 100.0 Page 7 Cuenca‚ R.M.‚ L. L. Gaines‚ and A. D. Vyas‚ 2000‚ Evaluation of Electric Vehicle Production and Operating Costs‚ Argonne National Laboratory
Premium Electric vehicle Plug-in hybrid Cost
the examination to facilitate verification. Name: - - - - - - - - - - - Date: 1. In the preparation of financial statements using variable costing‚ fixed manufacturing overhead is treated as a period cost. A) True B) False 2. Under variable costing‚ the unit product cost contains some fixed manufacturing overhead cost. A) True B) False 3. When the number of units in work~in-process and finished goods inventories increase‚ absorption costing operating income will typically be greater than
Premium Variable cost Costs Management accounting
Ch1 Discussion/Review: 2/4/5/9/11/13/15/17 Critical Thinking: 2 Discussion/Review 2. Identify the three major functional areas of business organizations and briefly describe how they interrelate. 4. List five important differences between goods production and service operations; then list five important similarities. 5. Briefly discuss each of these terms related to the historical evolution of operations management: a. Industrial Revolution b. Scientific management c.
Premium Productivity Supply and demand Wage
Chapter ’^ l.: v - Production Cost Variance Analyses The preceding three chapters focused on the nature‚ collection‚ and measurement of management accounting information. This is the first of five chapters that deal with the use of that information by management in controlling the organization. This chapter and Chapter 2l describe the calculation and use ofvariances. Chapters 22 to 25 deal with the use of responsibility accounting information in the management control process. Variances A variance
Premium Costs Variable cost Management accounting
would most likely be included as part of manufacturing overhead in the production of a wooden table? A) The amount paid to the individual who stains the table. B) The commission paid to the salesperson who sold the table. C) The cost of glue used in the table. D) The cost of the wood used in the table. 9. Which of the following statements is correct in describing manufacturing overhead
Premium Management accounting Variable cost Costs
Tootsie Roll Industries Ratios (pg 732) The Hershey Company Ratio Interpretation and comparison between the two companies’ ratios Earnings per Share Current Ratio Hershey had net sales close to ten times those of (4‚946‚716 (51‚625 Earnings / Tootsie Roll‚ however their outstanding shares were Earnings / 492‚753 54‚296 Outstanding also an order of magnitude greater than those of Outstanding Shares) = $0.95 Tootsie Roll. Although earnings are greater for Shares) = $0.96 Hershey‚ the
Premium The Hershey Company Chocolate Finance
study – Overhead cost analysis‚ Proceedings IGLC‚ Gramado‚ Brasil Král‚ B. 2006‚ Manažerské účetnictví‚ Management Press‚ ISBN 80-7261-141-0 Lucas‚ M. 1997‚ Absorption costing for decision making‚ in Management Accounting‚ ABI/INFORM GLOBAL‚ pg. 42 Nekvapil‚ T. 2004‚ Netradičně o ABM – Controller a zombie‚ Controlling 4/2004‚ ISSN 1801-6251 Petřík‚ T. 2007‚ Procesní a hodnotové řízení firem a organizací‚ Linde Praha‚ ISBN 978-80-7201-648-8 Popesko‚ B.‚ Novák‚ P. 2008‚ Principles of overhead cost allocation
Premium Cost accounting Costs Cost