existed between them‚ HELD: Although Philippine labor laws and jurisprudence define clearly the elements of an employer-employee relationship‚ this is the first time that the Court will resolve the nature of the relationship between a television and radio station and one of its “talents.” There is no case law stating that a radio and television program host is an employee of the broadcast station. Applying the control test to the present case‚ we find that SONZA is not an employee but an independent
Premium Employment
Law Case Analysis Material Facts and Source of Law The plaintiff William Shelensky was a director who owned a minority stockholder of Defendant Corporation called Chicago National League Ball Club‚ which operated Chicago Cubs. The Cubs had been suffering operating losses from direct baseball operations from 1961-1965. The director defendant Philip K. Wrigley who owned 80% stock shares did not install lights at Wrigley Field so that the Cubs could not play at night when at home‚ even though the
Premium Law Decision making Chicago Cubs
Fabiani Case Introduction The Antoine Fabiani case is an international case which involved the Government of Venezuela and the government of France where the two governments agreed to get an arbitrator to put to rest on the case of M. Antonio Fabiani in the most just manner and without bias. This shows that law has no barriers and no matter how powerful in terms of government or inferior‚ in this case Fabiani‚ the law will always be just provided the best means are pursued. In this case both the
Premium Law Jurisdiction Switzerland
Case- Law & ethics 1 of 2 DOCUMENTS CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN S.A.‚ CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN‚ L.L.C.‚ CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN‚ Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellants‚ v. YVES SAINT LAURENT AMERICA HOLDING‚ INC.‚ YVES SAINT LAURENT S.A.S.‚ YVES SAINT LAURENT AMERICA‚ INC.‚ Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees‚ YVES SAINT LAURENT‚ (an unincorporated association)‚ JOHN DOES‚ A TO Z‚ (Unidentified)‚ JANE DOES‚ A TO Z‚ (Unidentified)‚ XYZ COMPANIES‚ 1 TO 10‚ (Unidentified)‚ Defendants-Appellees. Docket
Premium Trademark
Case Law Analysis – Tort Laws Cornelius C. Chase Capella University BUS3021 – Fundamentals of Business Law Professor Cynthia Geppert Abstract In a defamation action brought by plaintiff-terminated employee‚ Hoeper‚ against defendant-airline‚ Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp‚ for statements made to the Transportation Security Administration regarding their concerns involving the location of plaintiff’s weapon and his stability upon his termination‚ judgment for plaintiff is reversed and remanded‚ where:
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Tort Transportation Security Administration
ASIAN CASE RESEARCH JOURNAL‚ VOL. 8‚ ISSUE 2‚ 187– 213 (2004) ACRJ Diecraft Australia This case was prepared by Associate Professor Kannan Sethuraman and Visiting Professor Devanath Tirupati of the Melbourne Business School as a basis for classroom discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of an administrative or business situation. Please address all correspondence to: Associate Professor Kannan Sethuraman‚ Melbourne Business School‚ Carlton‚ Australia‚ Vic
Premium Management Business Business school
2nd of feb CASES MALLIK V BCC: Malik and Mahmud v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA [1997] UKHL 23 is a leading English contract law and UK labour law case‚ which confirmed the existence of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence in all contracts of employment. Facts: Mr Malik and Mr Mahmud both worked for the Bank of Credit and Commerce International. BCCI went insolvent due to massive fraud‚ connection with terrorists‚ money-laundering‚ extortion and a raft of other criminal
Premium Contract Breach of contract
Article/Case Law Search Ngozi Ofolomah HCS/430 February 4‚ 2013 Vanessa Williams Article/Case Law Search The aftermath of the 9/11 in 2001‚ has left the United States of America in frenzy. It is this particular event that has been devastating to our nation and unforgettable. Furthermore‚ stressing the importance of the safety and health of the general public. September 11‚ has caused federal and state governments to merge public health and public safety into one. This merger brought about
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
EMTALA The article I chose to discuss was a court case involving the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA). A Dickinson County hospital violated EMTALA for failing to provide emergency care for a patient who was transferred to a different hospital without being completely stable enough for transfer. In 1985‚ Congress passed the law of “Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act” also known as (EMTALA) to ensure public access and treatment to emergency services regardless of race
Premium Emergency medical services Medicine Hospital
1 LS 220 Constitutional Law ASSIGNMENT ONE ‘ADVISE THE MP ON THE LEGALITY‚ IN PARTICULAR‚ THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE MIGRATION BILL 2014.’ UNIT CO-ORDINATOR: DR OTTAVIO QUIRICO WORD COUNT: 1925 I INTRODUCTION The proposed Migration Bill (hereafter referred to as the Bill) raises a number of issues that must be analysed in order to ascertain the constitutionality of the proposals within the Act. The main considerations arise from sections 180‚ and 181 which state ‘that an officer must detain
Premium Law United Kingdom Human rights