Please put “Peer Review” at the top of your posting so I will see it and give you credit for it when I am grading. List your peer’s name. Answer: What was your favorite part of her/his comments? Did he/she cite the textbook if appropriate? Evaluate his/her use of online resources. (Check the website links to see if the links work and are on topic. Did your peer explain how the website was relevant to the discussion topic?) Evaluate the
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Freedom of speech United States Constitution
A Jury of Her Peers a story in which themes such as the subjugation of women‚ men’s obliviousness to women’s importance shown in addition to their forced roles are presented as passive subordinates to men by which our protagonists prove this to be wrong. Also being something prominently established because of the setting. The mistreatment only being recognized by the two wives who understand struggle that is being a farm wife. In A Jury of Her Peers men and women’s roles in society are worlds apart
Premium Gender Woman Wife
mistakes we turn to those closest to us to point our flaws‚ our peers. From my experience peer reviews are usually halfhearted comments about a paper you do not care about in order to complete an assignment. However‚ the peer review I received and gave for Project One was insightful and genuine. As a reader the assignment helped me discover new was to present an argument to my audience. It also helped me recognize the similar mistakes my peers and I made in our project one papers. An example of this
Premium Writing Essay Management
Peer Evaluation Sample The first speech I am going to evaluate is Jane Doe’s speech about why music is good for people and the positives effect of it. Jane started out very well by giving a personal example of using music in her own life which got the audience’s attention. I liked it when she started off with a story and example because it helped me understand what she was trying to say to the class. She then introduced her topic and stated her reasons of why everybody should have an iPod and
Premium Speech Critical thinking Debut albums
of Peer-reviewed and Non-peer-reviewed Sources First Last ABC University Abstract Doctoral students have a wealth of readily available information from which to conduct research. Not all of this information is credible. The challenge for the doctoral student is to pick high quality sources. This paper will discuss peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed sources‚ and how the CARS Checklist can help find credible material for research. Credibility Assessment of Peer-reviewed and Non-peer-reviewed
Premium Peer review
Guidelines to the Functions of a Peer Educator Be aware that being a Peer Educator changes an individual over time. Remember that as a Peer Educator your peers are observing you in the capacity of a role model‚ so one needs to be careful in the information that are given out in dealing with your peers. As a Peer Educator one has to be personally open to change and growth. Know who you are‚ what yours values and deals are and how they affect you as an individual. Personal identity is very important
Premium Sociology Person Individual
Axia College Material Appendix G Peer Review Checklist* What is the main point of this paper? Whether video games are good or bad for people‚ and how popular this industry really is. What is the greatest strength of this paper? I enjoyed the way the author has all of his research in such great order. His numbers and statistics help explain what he/she is writing about. The graphs are also very informative. The author studied the subject very well. What material does not seem to
Premium Writing English-language films Research
A Jury of Her Peers BSM Portfolio Assignment This paper demonstrates Hodges University’s learning outcome of critical thinking. Jason George – First Wheel Hodges University MNA-4100 Economics for Managers Professor Ron Harbour Due: March 27‚ 2013 Submitted: March 27‚ 2013 Graded by BSM Instructor: __________________________ Grade Awarded: __________________________________ Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………….3 Situational Analysis……………………………………………………………………………
Premium Critical thinking Maslow's hierarchy of needs
Application of Background and Methodology of the Research Process The pervasiveness of obesity and obesity-related disease among children living in the United States is causing increasing attention. In the past two decades‚ childhood obesity has more than doubled in children aged six to 11‚ rising from 6.5% in 1980 to 17.6% in 2006. Obesity among adolescents between the ages of 12 and 19 has more than tripled from 6.5% to 17.6% within the same period (Li‚ & Hooker‚ 2010). The increased prevalence
Premium Obesity
Collaboration and Peer Reviews Reflective Journal 3 One major advantage of collaborating on a project is that working with a group can infuse a project with a rich array of perspectives. Another advantage is it makes the project more time effective because you have a group and you can assign different tasks to each member. A disadvantage of collaborating is that you are dealing with a lot of different personalities that can sometimes clash. Another disadvantage would be some members may be
Premium Collaboration Education Psychology