The issue presented is whether or not Josie was operating her vehicle. Based on the fact pattern in Josie’s case the finding of her being in “operation” would be in her favor under the applicable law. Operating while intoxicated (OWI) is defined by Ind. Code § 9-30-5-2‚ which states‚ “A person who operates a vehicle while intoxicated commits a Class C misdemeanor.” Ind. Code 9-13-2-118‚ defines “operator” meaning a person who drives or is in actual control of a motor vehicle upon a highway. To determine
Premium Police Automobile Crime
Moreover‚ in the case of Max‚ they have a same similar approach regarding market research‚ although in a different manner. As the owner of startup micro-sized company he also conducted a wide market research but using efficient software and tools. Max described his approach as follows: Yes‚ I do the market research myself. I have invested in some software tools that helps me with some automation with marketing and promotion things. I have also marketing research software that helps me to search
Premium Management Marketing Strategic management
CASE 6.4 Tommy O’Connell‚ Audit Senior 1. Compare and contrast the professional roles of an audit senior and a staff accountant. In your analysis‚ consider the different responsibilities assigned to each role‚ the job-related stresses that individuals in the two roles face‚ and how each role contributes to the successful completion of an audit engagement. Which of these two roles is (a) more important and (b) more stressful? Defend your choices. Staff Auditor (1-3 years) performs the detail
Premium Audit Financial audit Auditing
2. The portion of settlement that is exempt from taxation The Schleier case further discusses “on account of personal physical injury” cited in code section 104(a)(2). Ultimately‚ settlements that can be considered “on account of personal physical injuries” would allow amounts related to medical pain/injury and suffering related to damages‚ and lost wages excluded from being taxed and exempt under Section 104. By meeting the requirements of Code Section 104(a)(2)‚ Ms. Wun is able to exclude $60
Premium Tort law Law Tort
Amazon of Innovation Case 1. Based on the information provided in the case‚ Amazon’s competitive strategy can go either way – it is possible to justify Amazon’s strategy as a cost leader‚ simply because the case stresses‚ in more than on instance‚ in the fact that Amazon has razor thin margins‚ and places emphasis on discounted prices. However‚ I believe that Amazon’s competitive strategy is more oriented to differentiation. It’s clear from the timeline presented in this case that Amazon is not oriented
Premium Marketing Strategic management Economics
of causes‚ effects and methods of treatment for mental health diseases and disorders. ¥ Base knowledge of pertinent federal‚ state and local laws‚ codes and regulations. ¥ Immense ability to provide effective and detailed case management ¥ Exceptional ability to keep accurate case records and prepare reports. ¥ Great ability to maintain confidentiality as appropriate. ¥ Extensive experience in customer service. Continual training to improve and develop sales techniques. Committed to business development
Premium Customer service
OBLICON: EXTINGUISHMENT OF OBLIGATIONs Payment or Performance 1. Montecillo vs. Reynes FACTS: Respondents Ignacia Reynes and Spouses Abucay filed on June 20‚ 1984 a complaint for Declaration of Nullity and Quieting of Title against petitioner Rido Montecillo. Reynes asserted that she is the owner of a lot situated in Mabolo‚ Cebu City containing an area of 448 square meters. In 1981‚ Reynes sold 185 square meters of the Mabolo Lot to the Abucay Spouses who built a residential house on the lot they
Premium Contract Appellate court
Solectron: From Contract Manufacturer to Global Supply Chain Integrator Background Solectron Corporation is but another classic case of a company that benefited immensely from the dot.com boom‚ only to experience the pains of the bust as the dot.com companies went down in the early 2000s. From its humble beginnings in Milpitas‚ CA as a solar energy products manufacturer‚ Solectron grew to be a highly successful global supply chain integrator with revenues of $18.6 billion by 2001. From the
Premium Supply chain management Supply chain
EVANGELISTA & CO v. ABAD SANTOS (G.R. No. 31684; June 28‚ 1973) FACTS: On October 9‚ 1954 a co-partnership was formed under the name of "Evangelista & Co." On June 7‚ 1955the Articles of Co-partnership was amended as to include herein respondent‚ Estrella Abad Santos‚ as industrial partner‚ with herein petitioners Domingo C. Evangelista‚ Jr.‚ Leonardo Atienza Abad Santos and Conchita P.Navarro‚ the original capitalist partners‚ remaining in that capacity‚ with a contribution of P17‚500
Premium Contract Appellate court Trial court
Case Holding - Ensures treatment compliance - Indirectly‚ this will translate to treatment success or cure - Poor treatment compliance may lead to the following outcomes: o Chronic infectious illness o Drug resistance o Death Poor Case Holding 1. Inadequate drugs and poor drug distribution 2. Patient’s non-adherence 3. Physician’s non-adherence 4. Low motivation of health workers SLU PPMD Unit: Operations PTB Suspect - Cough > 2 weeks with or without the following o Fever o
Premium Patient Medicine Illness