Reasonably foreseeable victims were brought to the forefront by cases such as Tarasoff v. the Regents of the University of California and subsequent duty to warn cases. Foreseeable means that a “reasonable anticipation of the possible results of an action” exists (Foreseeability. (n.d.)). The Tarasoff decision defined the first two categories of reasonably foreseeable victims‚ a person directly named by the client as being the target‚ and a person that a psychologist deems identifiable by using
Premium Family Parent Child abuse
with pay allows the organization time to have the pretermination hearing and allow the appeals process time to work towards the resolution. Courts are backlogged and nine months in this case is not unheard of‚ that is a long time to be waiting to see if you will get your job back if you are not being paid. This case also addressed the need to expediency in completing the hearing and appeal process. “Since the Due Process Clause requires provision of a hearing “at a meaningful time‚” at some point‚
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution Police
WITH LOW DOSE OF ARIPIPRAZOLE IN MENTAL RETARDATION- A FIRST CASE REPORT. ABSTRACT Aripiprazole is considered as a third generation antipsychotic and known for its unique partial agonist activity at dopamine D2 and serotonin 5-HT1Areceptors. Partial antagonist action at serotonin 5-HT2Areceptors . The common neurological side effects are extra pyramidal symptoms‚ headache‚ insomnia and drowsiness. Seizures had been reported in 2 cases of adults with normal intelligence and 1 in healthy 3 year
Premium Major depressive disorder Bipolar disorder Schizophrenia
retains all ownership rights to the development of X. It also states that in R&D arrangements the entity (in this case Pharmagen) usually has an option to either purchase the partnership’s interest (PEI) or to obtain the exclusive rights to the entire results in return for a lump sum payment or royalty payments to the partnership (in this case PEI). This clearly fits into Pharmagen’s case since PEI is entitled to receive future royalties from Pharmagen in return for contributions (funds) for the development
Premium Pharmacology Pharmaceutical drug Pharmacy
Milford Case After reading this case‚ my ranking is as follows: Dufree‚ Burke‚ Harlow‚ Alderson‚ Eaton‚ Gibson‚ Furness‚ and Caplan. The way in which I rated these salesmen was based on the information given in both cases (A&B). Dufree was given the number one sales person for the simple fact that she was able to have the third highest sales with relatively no large accounts. This shows that she is maximizing her profitability and sales in these smaller markets. I believe that she has the
Premium Sales Sales management Business school
Question 1: What‚ if any‚ is the likely impact of the Bilski case on future Business Method Patents? The Supreme Court unanimously agreed that Bilski’s method patent for hedging risk in commodities trading did not meet the legal requirements. They also agreed that the Federal Circuit’s "machine-or-transformation" test is not the sole test for what constitutes a process. However‚ the remainder of the decision is divided between the conservative majority and the liberal minority as to whether
Premium Patent Law Supreme Court of the United States
COSTCO Case * In 1998‚ How were membership fees recorded in COSTCO’s financial statements? The membership fees recorded as revenue when received in Costco’s financial statement in 1998 according to the cash accounting. * Was this correct? If not‚ what accounting principle does it violate? No. It violates the revenue recognition principle because they did not provide services to members when they pay the membership fee during this fiscal year. It can only record this item as unearned
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Revenue Sales
subsidy scheme and the Plaintiff sued the Government for subsidies it claimed it was due. Rules There was no contract. The statement made by the Commonwealth was not offered as consideration for the plaintiff buying the wool. The Court stated that in cases such as this: ‘… it is necessary‚ … that it should be made to appear that the statement or announcement which is relied on as a promise [here the subsidy statement] was really offered as consideration for the doing of the act‚ and that the act [buying
Premium Contract Plaintiff Defendant
The case of Siegel‚ et al. v. Ford Motor Company is a class action suit brought around by older managers who indicated the company ’s performance appraisal system unethically targeted them for termination due to their age. AARP assisted as co-counsel for the case which aids over four-hundred elder supervisors working with Ford Motor Company. The plaintiffs proclaim that senior administration established the system to remove older managers (US Newswire‚ 2002). The claim is that by constantly receiving
Premium Ford Motor Company Management Corporation
The court’s decision‚ prompted by Thind’s attempt to claim that being Caucasian was the same as being white‚ provided an explicit definition of what the term meant. The court concluded that when the government was drafting the regulations in 1906 they were referring to the common understanding of the world and a scientific understanding. Therefore‚ white did not mean Caucasian or Aryan but only the type of man that those who wrote the statute “understood as white”‚ which included primarily immigrants
Premium Racism White people Race