On Monday October 28‚ 2016 Wellness Coach Teresa Cain went to Wilfred Gallegos apartment to see how he was doing since I have not seen him come by staff office in a few days. Wellness Coach knocked on Mr. Gallegos door and he open the door while appearing to be well groomed. Mr. Gallegos was listing to music while relaxing. Mr. Gallegos said Hi and wellness coach responded hi and asked how his morning was going. Mr. Gallegos stated that he was doing well but let me know that he was unable to attend
Premium Patient Medicine Health care provider
AUTHENTIC JUROR TESTIMONY IN RESPONSE TO AN OFFICIAL REVIEW OF JURY SYSTEM OF NEW YORK STATE NAME: Shreya Shah OFFICIAL ADDRESS: St Peters Lutheran College‚ 66 Harts Road‚ Indooroopilly‚ Qld‚ 4068 COURT NAME: The Supreme Court of New York State TRIAL: Murder Case of Puerto Rican Youth DATE AND DURATION OF SERVICE: 9 July 1957‚ Duration of 4 hours DATE OF COMPOSITION: 12 August 1957 The jury system either the majority or unanimous system is a part of our Justice system. Recently
Free Jury
I. TESTAMONIE: * From Witnesses: * Witness heard fighting between boy and father at 8pm * Witness saw boy run out of building after fight * Witness heard boy yell “I’m going to kill you” at 12:10 A.M. * Witness heard body fall a second later * Witness saw boy run down stairs and out of building * Witness from across street‚ 60 feet away‚ divided by an “L” line‚ saw boy stab his father in a downward motion through her bedroom window‚ looking through the windows of the last
Premium KILL Man Academy Award for Best Actor
To place multiple men in a room to decide the fate over a criminal can lead to many biases being expressed in means to back up one ’s opinion on the case. The personal predilections & biases made by some individuals who happen to be part of a jury can ultimately either place an innocent man in jail or let a guilty man run free. The Reginald Rose play Twelve Angry Men shows just how dangerous it is for jurors to bring their personal agendas to the table through the bigoted biases of Juror 10 and the
Free Jury Not proven Verdict
The dramatic play of Twelve Angry Men‚ authored by Reginald Rose in 1955‚ focuses on a jury’s deliberations concerning a homicide trial. The trial revolves around a 16-year-old boy who is accused of stabbing his father to death. A guilty verdict means an automatic death sentence for the boy. Throughout the play Juror three displays his flaws as a result of his prejudice but he is not the most flawed as others demonstrate similar tendencies. Nevertheless‚ he is quite unrealistic‚ like his fellow jurors
Premium Jury Not proven Verdict
disagree because of their own personal reasons and prejudice feelings towards the case.One reason why a person should be innocent until proven guilty is because not all witnesses testify the truth or are not completely accurate.As seen in the film”Twelve Anger Men”.The testimony of the old man that lives in the same apartment building with the boy that’s on trail seems to be believable.The old man testified that he heard what
Premium Crime Jury Black people
It is a matter of life and death and it is all up to twelve people. According to Johnnie Cochran “If it doesn’t make sense‚ you should find for the defense.” If the facts that are presented by the prosecution are not clear then the jury should vote the defendant not guilty. One may disagree with this statement because if the evidence that is presented in court is unclear‚ and then the jury grants the defendant not guilty and the defendant really did commit the crime then there is a criminal on the
Premium Jury
Stereotypes use generalisations to characterise people‚ and 10th juror is particularly prone to stereotyping the defendant based on socio-economic background. He regularly makes generalised statements about ’those people’ (p.6)‚ without ever justifying his opinions with concrete details. Examples include: .I’m tellin’ you they let the kids run wild up there’ (p.6). . ’... You’re not going to tell us that we’re supposed to believe that kid‚ knowing what he is. Listen‚ I’ve lived among ’em all
Free Stereotype Prejudice
Don’t Believe Everything You Hear 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose is a twisting story where a son is accussed of stabbing his father to death. Twelve strangers are told to listen to this court case and are then stuck in a small‚ hot room where they are told to decide on a verdict‚ whether or not the kid lives or dies. The jury finally decides on the verdict of : Not Guilty. Three major facts that influence the juries agreement that the accussed is not guilty include doubts of the murder weapon‚ doubts
Premium Jury Not proven Verdict
Sidney Lumet is the director of 12 Angry Men and it was released in 1957. It is about a jury who must decide the outcome of a murder case committed by a 16 year old boy. They all become very angry and slowly everyone goes from choosing guilty to not guilty. Throughout the movie the jurors true characters are revealed and they learn about the past of each other. The movie‚ 12 Angry Men‚ uses juror #3 to illustrate the emotions of everyone in the room by showing his stubbornness‚ extreme anger‚ and
Premium Not proven Jury Verdict