The Keystone XL pipeline is a pipeline that runs from Canada to the United States. This pipeline would take expensive Canadian tar sand oil in Alberta to the southeast part of Texas next to the Gulf of Mexico‚ so petroleum products can be transported around the world. This great project would supply petroleum demands and create many jobs. The battle between industrialists for the petroleum and the environmentalists against the petroleum has great influence on the Keystone pipeline. The only thing
Premium Petroleum Oil sands Natural gas
policies‚ is available at http://ite.pubs.informs.org. I N F O R M S Transactions on Education doi 10.1287/ited.1090.0033cs2 © 2009 INFORMS Case Series BlueSky Airlines: Network Revenue Management Tuck School of Business‚ Dartmouth College‚ Hanover‚ New Hampshire 03755‚ robert.shumsky@dartmouth.edu Robert A. Shumsky BlueSky flies three airplanes between Houston and three cities‚ Chicago‚ Miami‚ and Phoenix. These three cities are the spokes connected by the Houston hub. A few times
Premium Airline Marginal cost Costs
Austin Van Hoesen Professor Ratcliffe WRC 1023 28th February 2013 Accept Keystone with an Understanding Is the Keystone XL Pipeline really worth the risk? There are many Americans that believe so and there are just as many that don’t think so. Each side has their reasons and they are sufficient reasons backed up by liable sources. The Keystone XL Pipeline is a pipeline system that would transport crude oil for the Tar Sands in Alberta‚ Canada‚ through the continental United States all the way
Premium
Keystone XL Pipeline: A Risky Venture Introduction to Transportation Management‚ TLMT 311 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Overview of Issue 3-6 Supporters of Keystone XL Pipeline 6-7 Discussion of Opposition to Keystone XL Pipeline 7-8 Conclusion 9 References 10 Throughout history‚ The United States has been much reliant upon oil rich countries for liquid
Premium United States Petroleum Canada
The Keystone XL Pipeline: Environmental Impact Abstract. The topic of global oil production is becoming a well-recognized political issue‚ as it should‚ but the environmental impacts need to be addressed as well. The recent development project of the Canadian oil sands has been put into the spotlight after the TransCanada Company applied for a permit allowing their Keystone XL pipeline. Introduction. The Keystone XL pipeline is a project of oil companies invested in tar sands oil‚ which
Premium Petroleum Oil sands
The Keystone XL Pipeline was a proposed pipeline that would have transported crude oil from Hardisty‚ Alberta to Steele City‚ Nebraska. The pipeline would have stretched 1‚179 miles in a direct path to Steele City‚ Nebraska. The proposed pipeline was hoping to bring thousands of jobs to the market‚ strengthen the economy of the US and the communities surrounding the pipeline‚ and of course to transport oil in a safe way to fuel the needs of the American people. After seven years of review‚ the
Premium Petroleum Fossil fuel Natural gas
in brown and black oil. Jonathan Waldman‚ an environmental journalist at the University of Colorado‚ published an article that argued that the Keystone XL pipeline should be built because it is the safest way to move tar sands oil‚ does not affect the environment and climate‚ and creates effective jobs. However‚ that is not the case. The Keystone XL Pipeline is actually a dangerous way to move oil from Point A to Point B‚ affects the environment negatively‚ and does not create effective jobs. In the
Premium Petroleum Natural gas Peak oil
A Canadian company‚ Keystone XL Pipeline‚ wants to export oil from its vast supply into the United States and possibly to other markets as well. Some groups are against the pipeline for various reasons‚ one of which is they state the oil sands project is harmful to the environment. They further say that the increased oil supply to the US will not make a large dent in our overall consumption and therefore is pointless. I completely disagree with this logic. The increase in the oil supply would
Premium United States Petroleum Canada
Argument Essay Outline Title: Keystone XL Pipeline Construction Thesis: The project is controversial because it clearly involves some environmental risks and spillovers to nature and society while economic benefits are also hard to ignore‚ but the best way to deal with the issue is adopting market-oriented regulations. • Keystone Pipeline System has been a major source of crude oil import for the U.S. in recent years. According to The New York Times‚ the Keystone alone supplies about a half million
Premium Petroleum
In my opinion‚ authorizing the Keystone XL pipeline would be damaging to the environment. Displace residents from their home or property if it obstructs the construction of the pipeline. And lastly‚ will only cause a short term economic benefit to the working class who seek long term employment not a seasonal position. The construction of the Keystone Xl pipeline will be detrimental to the environment because it will disperse greenhouse gases into the atmosphere from the extraction of tar sand
Premium Carbon dioxide Global warming Fossil fuel