Airbus A3XX: Developing the World’s Largest Commercial Jet Introduction: From its inception in 1970‚ Airbus has maintained a reputation for innovative design and technology. Airbus has employed a “fly-by-wire” technology on all of its planes as an efficient alternative to computerized control for mechanical linkages. In addition‚ Airbus streamlined operations and features that have lead to better pilot utilization and lower training costs. These advances help explain why Airbus had received over
Premium Net present value Weighted average cost of capital Cash flow
In the Airbus case we are faced with a capital budgeting decision. It is the planning process used to determine whether a firm’s long term investments such as new machinery‚ replacement machinery‚ new plants‚ new products‚ and research development projects are worth pursuing. It is budget for major capital‚ or investment‚ expenditures. Capital budgeting decisions are crucial to a firm’s success for several reasons. First‚ capital expenditures typically require large outlays of funds. Second‚ firms
Premium Boeing 747 Boeing 787 Boeing
The idea of a jumbo airliner being capable of seating over 500 people almost seemed unreal. That is‚ until Airbus came along. This idea for the jumbo plane started as a joint venture with Boeing‚ but after it started Boeing backed out because of high costs and speculation of demand. Airbus pushed along and in 1999‚ they completed to rough draft of this plane. The problem with this plane that was obvious was first the overall cost of the plane. It was estimated to cost about 13 billion to launch.
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Investment Net present value
Airbus A3XX case study Group E10‚ MBA 2011 Airbus A3XX case study‚ Group E10 Airbus objectives Both Airbus and Boeing‚ as well as industry experts expected worldwide passenger traffic to grow at an average annual growth rate of 4.8-4.9% for the next 20 years (up until 2019). Given that the traffic was expected to almost triple in volume‚ both manufacturers expected a significant increase in aircraft sales‚ although their views on the market structure were different. Airbus expected hub-to-hub
Premium Airline Southwest Airlines Low-cost carrier
Executive Summary In fierce competition with Boeing‚ venture into VLA segment – as a rather neglected segment by Boeing – could pose as a strategic opportunity for Airbus which it could utilize to build a competitive advantage combined with its technological resources and capabilities. However‚ its assumptions of a drastic increase in VLAs demanded in next 20 years along with its ability to satisfy most of this are too optimistic. Provided that these assumptions (inc. breakeven points‚ initial order
Premium Boeing Boeing 747
Wdebt = proportion of debt in a market- value capital structure rd = pretax cost of debt capital tc = marginal effective corporate tax rate Wequity = proportion of equity in a market-value capital structure re = cost of equity capital We know from the case that: Tc = 35% Rf = 0.85% Wdebt = 44646/129686= 0.344% Wequity = 85040/129686= 0.656% From Exhibit 11‚ rd is calculated as below which is 5.335% |Debt amount |Price |Market value |YTM |Weighted YTM | |202 |106.175 |214.474 |3.911%
Premium Weighted average cost of capital Investment Net present value
Why did Boeing adopt the radical change approach for designing and developing the 787 Dreamliner? What were the risks? In your opinion‚ was it a good move? Defend your choice. Boeing adopted the radical change approach for designing and developing the 787 Dreamliner because they were in competition with Airbus and needed a new approach in which they could use innovation to stand out upon their competitiors. Boeing was looking to reduce manufacturing costs and development times. Boeing took an
Premium Supply chain management Supply chain Management
Case Study of Airbus Amy West‚ Kylie Herriman‚ Gerrie Johnson‚ Ruth Littleton OPS/571 November 14‚ 2011 Doug Spunaugle Case Study of Airbus Introduction Airbus was first established as a consortium in 1967 when the French‚ German‚ and British government created a consortium to build European aircrafts. The originating goal was to challenge the American domination in the aerospace industry. They are headquartered in Toulouse‚ France
Premium Airline Airbus Aircraft
THE BOEING/AIRBUS WTO DISPUTE International Business Law – Contents Introduction The commercial airline industry has the conspicuous feature of extending the competition between companies and stepping into the realm of international trade disputes. One of the most high profile and recurring disputes between the United States and Europe concerns the fierce rivalry between two of the largest aircraft manufacturers in the world: Boeing and Airbus
Premium European Union World Trade Organization International trade
Situational Analysis‚ Airbus. Porter’s Five Forces. Risk of Entry by Potential Competitors – The aviation industry is a very difficult industry to enter‚ and the risky of entry by potential competitors is extremely low. Rivalry among established companies – The intensity of rivalry among established companies within the aviation industry is very high. Currently the only competitor or Airbus is Boeing. Both of these companies gain market share from each other using prices‚ product design‚ advertising
Premium Boeing 787 Airline Strategic management