The Boeing 7E7 Team 14 Constantine Brocoum Courtney Delia Stephanie Doherty David Dubois Radu Oprea October 15th‚ 2009 Contents Objectives 1 Management Summary 1 Cost of Equity 1 Equity Market Risk Premium 1 Beta 2 Risk Free Rate 2 Capital Structure Weights 2 Boeing 7E7 Project Evaluation 4 Circumstances for an economically attractive project 4 Market Demand 4 Market Share 4 Sensitivity Analysis 4 Conclusion 7 Board approval for the project? 7 Appendices 7 Appendix
Premium Stock market Weighted average cost of capital
When it comes to investing in the 7E7 project the investors have three major options. The first of these options is to invest in the project with a short term gain in mind. Secondly the shareholder can invest expecting the project to pay off in the long-term. And lastly the prospective shareholder can choose to not invest in the project as a whole. In order to evaluate the profitability of the 7E7 project we are going to calculate the WACC of the project and then compare it to the stated IRR of 15
Premium Weighted average cost of capital Investment Net present value
segment respectively‚ while Boeing only had 46%of revenues derived from this area; these four companies are not sufficiently similar. In addition‚ the commercial airline segment was depressed by the terrorism events and SARS‚ and the defense segment benefited from the Iraq war; as a result‚ it is too optimistic to use the beta of comparable companies. To take the crisis of the commercial airline market into account‚ it is more appropriate to use the estimated beta of Boeing according to past 60 trading
Premium Net present value Weighted average cost of capital Internal rate of return
and partners along the way and outperform the competition. For Boeing‚ trying to become the global leader in its industry again meant that they needed to launch an exceptional‚ better aircraft than their competition‚ Airbus. They were also relying on foreign partners more than ever before to get every part ready in time for assembly. With the launch of their 25th model named the 787 Dreamliner‚ scheduled for delivery in 2008‚ Boeing promised to provide airlines with a fuel efficient aircraft and
Premium Boeing 787 Boeing Commercial Airplanes Airline
CHANGE MANAGEMENT at BOEING : AN ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVE When a company invests in a project‚ it projects the RoI and does the cost-benefit analysis. Boeing’s ambitious Dreamliner project was supposed to be executed the way Boeing had done it for decades together – by building the aircraft in-house. However‚ after the 2011 terrorist attacks‚ air traffic plunged and so did the demand for aircraft. The idea of investing USD 10 billion to develop a new plane seemed hurting as the market
Premium Management
Building the Boeing 787 1. What are the benefits to Boeing of outsourcing so much work on the 787 to foreign suppliers? What are the potential risks? Do the benefits outweigh the risks? Benefits: * Outsourcing the state-of-the-art electronics on the flight deck and in the passenger compartments allowed Boeing to reduce the risks associated with this technological gamble; * Boeing was able to negotiate $8 billion in development costs from the partners in return for a share of
Premium Boeing 787 Management Boeing 737
Competitor Analysis - Product These two companies Boeing and Airbus in the Aviation Industry‚ there have always been various airframe producers which were competing against each other. Throughout the years‚ two of them gained the majority of the market share. The American company Boeing has been the market leader for a very long period of time‚ until Airbus outturned them for the first time in 2002. In recent years‚ Airbus has put itself at the top of the aircraft-building world with the A380‚
Premium Boeing 747 Boeing 787 Airbus
Class Boeing is an Aerospace science company and is the world’s most leading aerospace science company and is the largest manufacturer and producer of commercial and military aircrafts. Boeing creates and produces rotorcraft‚ electronic and defense systems‚ missiles‚ satellites‚ launch vehicles and advanced information and communication systems. A little known fact about Boeing is that they are a major services supply to NASA and Boeing helps to operate the International
Premium Boeing 787 Supply chain Supply chain management
Boeing Internal Analysis Purpose This report discussed the components of internal analysis‚ competitive advantage‚ and strategic competitiveness of Boeing Company. This is done by analyzing the tangible & intangible resources‚ capabilities‚ and core competencies in order to clarify Boeing’s strengths and weaknesses. Resources Exhibit 1 Tangible | Intangible | Manufacturing plants | Boeing’s digital design software | Composite and metal materials | Dynamic assembly line | Headquarters
Premium Manufacturing Assembly line Boeing 747
9 October 2012 Global Aircraft Competition In recent history‚ the global aircraft manufacturing and assembly has been controlled by two companies. The first of these companies‚ Boeing‚ was founded in 1916 in the Northwest United States and still survives today. Their direct competition‚ Airbus‚ was created in 1970 and by 1981‚ was controlled by France‚ Germany‚ Spain and Britain with support from the European Union. Today‚ many issues plague these two companies as they struggle to maintain their
Premium European Union United Kingdom United States