Section A Question 1) a) In the case of Donohue v Stevenson[1]‚ Donohue won the case. The ratio decidendi in the case was that the liability of negligence did not depend on the contractual relationship and that Stevenson owed the duty of care to Donohue as a manufacturer‚ not to cause foreseeable injuries to the users of the products. As there was an owed duty‚ Stevenson failed to practice the appropriate standard of care and in turn‚ the negligent act had caused the injuries to Donohue. Therefore
Premium Contract Contract law Tort
8th Circuit hasn’t expressly ruled on this issue‚ district courts in said circuit have borrowed from Courts in the 8th Circuit have dismissed claims of general anxiety and stress‚ even where the plaintiff’s injuries are more particularized. In Amburgy v. Express Scripts‚ Inc.‚ the plaintiff alleged that he and other members of the class had spent “considerable time and money protecting themselves” after the company’s inadequate security measures lead to the theft and ransom of customers’ personal information
Premium Law United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Bravo Fernandez v. United States is a court case that deals with Double Jeopardy. Double Jeopardy can be defined as “the prosecution of a person twice for the same offense (dictionary.com). ” Bravo Fernandez v. United States was argued on October 4th‚ 2016‚ because of an incident that took place in May of 2005. Mr. Fernandez‚ whom is the president of a private security firm in Puerto Rico‚ and Hector Martinez-Maldonado who is a member of the Senate. Both traveled to Las Vegas to watch a boxing match
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States Law
Muhammad Alharbi Legal Writing August2‚2015 Roe v. Wade 1973 The Facts: Abortion has been debated for many years. In 1967 the Committee on Human Reproduction wanted a policy against induced abortion except if the unborn child were not viable‚ in cases of rape‚ or for the mother’s health. In 1973 a class action suit was filed against Texas‚ stating that the Texas abortion laws were against the constitution of the US. The plaintiffs were Roe‚ a couple named Doe and Dr. Hallford. Dr. Hallford had been
Premium Abortion Roe v. Wade Pregnancy
1. Caption and Procedural History In the case of Auto Workers V. Johnson Controls‚ the Plaintiffs brought a class action suit against Johnson Control in federal district courts over illegal sex discrimination under Title VII. The district court entered a summary judgment for Johnson Controls. The court of appeals affirmed the district court’s decision‚ leading the plaintiff to then appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. J. Blackmun delivered the opinion of the court in which Marshall‚ Stevens‚ O’Connor
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States United States Constitution
Stelluti V. Casapenn Enterprises‚ LLC‚ D/B/A Powerhouse Gym Appellate Court of New Jersey‚ Decided August 5‚ 2010 FACTS Fitness center member Gina Stelluti sustained various injuries while participating in a fitness class. The plaintiff in this case claimed that her injuries were the result of the defendant’s negligence in regards to failing to repair the broken exercise bike‚ which had caused the injuries to the plaintiff. The defendant had filed for a motion for summery. The original trial court
Premium Tort Law Common law
Case examples outcomes: The importance of utilizing all the sources of the Agreement on Trade-Related-Aspects of Intellectual Property (TRIPS) is illustrated in the following case: Case #1: Carell v. The Shubert Organization‚ Inc. Facts: The Plaintiff‚ Candace Anne Carell was the make-up designer for the New York production of the Broadway musical Cats. The Shubert Organization‚ Inc. was the New York Corporation that produced Cats. The Shubert Organization also comprised of another production unit
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Law Contract
AN ORGANISATION STUDY At “V-GUARD” Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of degree in Master of Business Administration Submitted by ARAVIND.R (USN: 12MBA61031) Under the guidance of External Guide: Internal Guide: Mr. John Mathew Sebastian Prof. Premlatha Sr. Officer HR School of Business Jain University School of Business Bangalore February 2013 Prof. Premlatha Professor School of Business Jain
Premium Electronics Electronic engineering Management
Hildreth v. Tidewater Equipment Co. Summary John Hildreth was the sole shareholder‚ director‚ and officer HCE‚ Inc‚ a corporation in New Jersey. HCE-NJ began to do business in Maryland in early 1997. According to the Maryland code‚ it is required for foreign corporations to register with the Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxation before doing intrastate business in Maryland‚ and it is required to have a resident agent in Maryland. In February 1998‚ HCE-NJ rented equipment from Tidewater
Premium Corporation United States Virginia
Smith and Jones‚ P.A. 1234 Main Street New York‚ N.Y. 10000 December 13‚ 2013 Ms. Mary Jones 100 Florida Lane New York‚ N.Y. 1000 RE: Jones v. ABC Auto Company Dear Ms. Jones: Please be advised that the court has scheduled your case for a settlement conference to be held on Friday‚ December 27‚ 2013 at 9:30 a.m. The settlement conference will take place at the county courthouse located at 1050 Litigation Boulevard in New York. Mr. Smith has requested you contact us as soon as possible
Premium Law United States Appeal