Judicial Trend • Pakala Narayan Swamy v. King Emperor In the present case‚ the person accused was married to one of the daughters of the Diwan of Pithapuram Estate. The deceased Nukharaju was a peon in the Pithapuram estate. In 1936‚ the accused and daughter of Diwan who was married to accused visited Pithapuram. It was claimed in the facts of the prosecution’s case was that they borrowed Rs. 3000 from Nukharaju while they were staying in the Pithapuram. After some days‚ the accused and his wife
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Supreme Court of the United States Consciousness
STATEMENT OF THE CASE The matter currently comes before the court on Petitioner Elizabeth Hamilton and counsel’s appeal from the 2nd Circuit award of sanctions under 28 U.S.C § 1927 (2012) for attorney’s fees to Respondent Randall’s Plumbing Supply. (J.A. 8). The initial action was brought by the Petitioner in the Southern District of New York alleging she was wrongfully terminated and seeking to recover against Respondent. (J.A. at 4.) Petitioner is represented by the law firm Sullivan & Hart
Premium Law Civil procedure Appeal
` Holt v. Hobbs Summarization: The case between petitioner Gregory Holt and responder Ray Hobbs who was the director of the Arkansas Department of Corrections circles around the idea of freedom of religion. Now‚ having the freedom to practice whatever religion that you would like does bring its advantages and its disadvantages as a citizen of the United States. In this case‚ Supreme Court Judges had to make a decision over the whole controversial topic
Premium Supreme Court of the United States
Kiersten Foster AP Government & Politics December 8‚ 2013 Mr. Raveret Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission: First amendment rights or the government ’s cold shoulder to corporations? With the bitter wounds of British tyranny still stinging‚ the Founding Fathers thought up the first amendment. Democracy flourishes only when freedoms to express views‚ both political and those of other concerns‚ are guaranteed. What happens‚ however‚ when your own government
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States United States Constitution
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India and Others‚ 1987 SCR (1) 819 (OLEUM GAS LEAK CASE) M.C. Mehta v. Union of India is a famous tort law Indian case that brought in the concept of “Absolute Liability”. Every citizen has a right to fresh air and to live in a pollution free environment. This originated when Oleum gas leaked from Shriram Food and Fertilizers Industry in Delhi. This created a lot of panic among the people and laid down the principles of absolute liability. FACTS Shriram Food and Fertilizers
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution Leak
The Liebeck v. McDonald’s case was a product liability lawsuit filed by Stella Liebeck‚ a 79 year old woman who was burned by a scalding hot coffee. One Sunday afternoon in 1994‚ Stella Liebeck ordered a cup of coffee at a McDonald’s drive through in Albuquerque‚ New Mexico. As she sat alongside her grandson in a 1989 Ford Probe‚ Liebeck noticed that there were no cup holders on the passenger side. Acting quickly‚ Liebeck decided to put the coffee cup between her knees. When she removed the coffee
Premium Nutrition Obesity Blood
Cristina Piccariello COMS 400-01 April 16th‚ 2013 COMS 400 Zurcher v. Stanford Daily 436 U.S. 547 (1978) Facts The Stanford Daily‚ the respondent sought to enjoin Zurcher‚ the petitioner for abridging the newspaper’s constitutional right of possessing photographs and a report on a demonstration at a hospital. A warrant was issued from Zurcher to search The Stanford Daily for the demonstration photos based on probably cause. The paper then filed a suit claiming the warrants were unconstitutional
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
Emporia Unified School District (2001) is a case presented to argue that Ray Knight’s parents do not have grounds to pursue liability charges against school officials. In the case of Glaser v. Emporia Unified School District (2001) a seventh grade student was hit be a car and he was injured as he went off school grounds to a public street because he was being chased
Premium High school Education Teacher
end goal to break down this case‚ it would be a smart thought to begin by defining the term law and contract law. A law can be stated as “ A rule of civil conduct prescribed by the supreme power in a state‚ commanding what is right‚ and prohibiting what is wrong” (blackstone). Contract law can be defined as the written agreement which binds two people with certain rules and regulations as decided by both the parties and mentioned in the contract. The facts of the case Amal is a close friend of bushra
Premium Contract Contract
Barnhizer v. Paradise Valley Unified Sch. Dist.- A thirteen year old boy trespass onto the schools property climbing on a I-beam located on roof and fell to his death. The parents brought a wrongful death action against the school under the theory of attractive nuisance. The courts ruled in favor of the school because the attractive nuisance doctrine states "the children because of their youth do not discover the condition or realize the risk involved intermeddling with it or in coming within the
Premium Abuse Bullying High school