Unit 1: Introduction to Electronic Communication Saurabh Khatri Lecturer Department of Computer Technology VIT‚ Pune Syllabus Unit 2 Unit 4 Unit 5 Unit 1 Unit 3 Books to refer “Communication Electronics- Principles and Applications”‚ by Frenzel‚ Tata McGraw Hill Publication‚ ISBN 0-07048398-1‚ Edition 3rd. ”Computer Networks”‚ by Andrew S. Tenenbaum ‚ Prentice Hall of India‚ ISBN 81-203-2175-8‚ 4th Edition. Assessment Total assessment = 100 15 – CT (7.5)
Premium Modulation
Name: VALENTINE Date: ___October 28‚ 2012____ 1. Arrests are more likely to occur among adolescents who are: A) ages 12 to 14 rather than 15 to 17. B) females rather than males. C) European Americans rather than Asian Americans. D) good students. 2. To understand gender attitudes and roles‚ behaviorists stress: A) biological mechanisms. B) reinforcement. C) reasoning ability. D) unconscious motivations. 3. The group most likely to be taking medication for
Free Puberty
Bollywood v. Hollywood The expectations for Hollywood are quite high in talent. Nevertheless so are they for Bollywood. Bollywood is the same for the most part‚ but just consists of mostly Indians. Hollywood on the other hand is consisted of genres that include multiple races and culture in their moneymaking films. These two film industries on the contrary have somewhat different talents. Bollywood‚ to a certain extent‚ involves more dancing‚ singing‚ and longer movies. For Hollywood‚ movies are
Free Film
ANSWER : The issue is whether Apparat Pty Ltd can take legal action against Dali. In this case‚ Apparat as a retailer who sells expensive imported sports car has engaged Dali an advertisement agency to advertise his product on a TV station. The agreement agreed to be last for two years. It is said that Apparat wants to cancelled that week’s advertisement slots after knowing that the TV station was planning to run a movie based around the search for the wealthy driver who carelessly knocks down
Premium Contract Breach of contract Tort
Legal Opinion on the Benir v. Alba Case (Benir) On the present case being addressed to the International Court of Justice in dealing with the matter of sovereignty over the Island of Manca‚ the issue of legality belonging to which side of the parties at dispute is put forward. The problem however‚ lies in‚ the period at which the dispute took place‚ for International law has not evolved at that time unlike in this day and age. The Statement of fact is as follows: The Island of Manca‚ small
Premium Attack Attack! Sovereignty
Fundamentalism v. Modernism Fundamentalism beliefs‚ strictly following the Bible‚ creationism‚ nativism‚ and old values‚ clashed against Modernist ideas‚ primarily evolution and application of science‚ in the early 1900s due to differences of opinions. Four issues that reflect this ideological clash are the rise of the KKK‚ who harbored Fundamentalist and nativist beliefs; the Scopes trial‚ which pitted the curriculum of John T. Scopes and evolution against Fundamentalism creationism; the Sacco
Premium Ku Klux Klan
Question: In Baptist v. Sampson‚ the Texas Supreme Court did not agree with the appellate court that holding hospitals liable for the negligence of ER doctors should be a non-delegable duty. Explain why you agree or disagree with the Supreme Court. Under what theory can a hospital be held liable for the conduct of emergency room physicians who are independent contractors? You should be able to answer question three in no more than 2-3 pages. You need to discuss the theory of liability‚ what the
Premium Appeal Appellate court Supreme Court of the United States
BA. Honours Business Management BUSINESS MATTERS Business Issues: Tesco v Walmart TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. Introduction 3 2. Business Issues in the Retail Sector 3 3. Financial Health 5 3.1 Tesco 5 3.2 Walmart 7 4. Cultural Style & Leadership
Premium Wal-Mart Balance sheet Supermarket
Ohio (1961) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966). The ruling of Mapp v. Ohio determined that all evidence that is obtained by search and seizures that violate the Fourth Amendment is admissible in a criminal trial in a state court overruling Wolf v. Colorado‚ which holds the contrary. The Exclusionary Rule applied not only to the Fourth Amendments protections against search and seizures‚ but also to the Fifth Amendments protection against self-incrimination. Miranda v. Arizona brought the
Premium Exclusionary rule Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
7-Felthouse v Bindley (1862) 11 CBNS 869 (CCP) Summary: • “For a contract to come into existence‚ the offeree had to communicate his acceptance of the relevant offer to the offeror.” • This means that for a contract to come into play it has to be a bilateral agreement. One party cannot decide to enter someone else in a contract. Also‚ the case implies that changes in a contract nullify prior acceptances- if the contract changes‚ you need to agree the terms again. The Case: • F[elthouse]
Premium Contract