government contracts C. prohibits slavery and involuntary servitude D. guarantees equal protection of the law for all citizens 9) ____________ refers to actions taken to overcome the effects of past or present practices‚ policies‚ or other barriers to equal employment opportunity. A. ROWE B. Voluntarism C. Affirmative action D. Managing diversity 10) Which of the following would you associate with managing diversity? A. Quantitative B. Internally focused C. Government
Premium Discrimination Affirmative action Strategic management
QUESTIONS AND SECTION B ESSAYS | AFFIRMATIVE ACTION A LOOSING BATTLE? Section A : Short questions 1) IS THE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICY MORALLY DEFENSIBLE? EXPLAIN. In my opinion‚ I believe that the Affirmative Action Policy is not morally defensible as it tends to be more favorable towards a certain group of people. However according to an article in the Mail & Guardian Affirmative Action is still deemed as morally defensible. Affirmative Action was initially meant to affirm previously
Free Race White people Black people
Dear college admissions‚ Affirmative action really helps minorities and under privileged Americans. It helps them pay for college and get the right training they need for success later on in life‚ which will help the‚ later on in life to get better jobs. Hand in hand it’ll help out our economy in the long run. I can understand that some people would say that it wouldn’t be beneficial for the people that aren’t from minority backgrounds and that affirmative action is discrimination. People may say
Premium Affirmative action Minority group United States
1963 was passed A. women pg 80 B. African Americans C. the elderly D. Americans with disabilities 4) What term refers to those actions appropriate to overcome the effects of past or present policies‚ practices‚ or other barriers to equal employment opportunity? A. Reparation B. Emancipation C. Desegregation D. Affirmative action pg 119 5) In the employment context‚ _______________ can be viewed broadly as giving an unfair advantage or disadvantage to the members
Premium Discrimination Employment Affirmative action
presented with the case of Fischer vs. The University of Texas where Abigail Fisher was suing the University for discrimination in their affirmative action based admissions process. The Supreme Court voted 7-1 and ruled to send the case back to the lower courts for further review and put off making any final decisions to change the U.S. policy on affirmative action‚ a “longstanding but fragile societal compromise‚ one that forbids quotas but allows using race as one factor among many in the admissions
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
It is also imperative to clarify that during this study Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) and Equal Opportunity (EO) terminology are interchangeable; however‚ Affirmative Action is considered a separate component of the previously two stated. Many of these programs exist because of past unjust actions and to prevent future unjust actions. Their existence also presents a controversial appearance. The future research will also attempt to provide valid information that will clarify ones
Premium Management Affirmative action Discrimination
Abdul Razak enacted the New Economic Policy (NEP) which was later replaced by Mahathir Mohammad’s New Development Policy (NDP) which embodied the ideals which was in his famous book‚ “Malay Dilemma”. Mahathir Mohamad had even coined the term ‘affirmative action’ which represented the favoring for Malays for the welfare of the country. (Quah‚ 2010‚ April 14) Last March 2010‚ Prime Minister Najib Razak was under fire for trying to change the NDP into the New Economic Model (NEM) which aimed to lessen
Premium Malaysia Affirmative action Southeast Asia
(Google‚ 2013). In order to continue the fight against discrimination in the work place President John F. Kennedy addressed this social issue calling it affirmative action. Affirmative action’s sole purpose was to ensure that individuals applying for a job would be treated‚ without regard to their race‚ creed‚ color‚ or national origin (Affirmative Action). It was done so by Executive Order. The timing of this creation of social policy was at the height of the civil rights movement. In the early 1960’s
Premium Affirmative action Discrimination United States
effort. However‚ with various poli-socioeconomic changes within the nation‚ new elements are place forth as challenges to the existing system; a good example is the case loving vs. Virginia (1967) which paved the foundation to the present day affirmative action plan. In 1958‚ despite
Premium United States Affirmative action Discrimination
bodies of antidiscrimination law‚ quotas are regarded as discrimination. If a civil rights initiative can be portrayed as encouraging employers to adopt quotas‚ its political demise is nearly certain in the United States.[3] Narrow forms of affirmative action have survived‚ legally and politically‚ only to the extent that they can be distinguished from quotas. Quotas are so widely regarded as legally‚ politically‚ and morally repugnant that they are taboo: The “q-word”[4] is rarely the subject of
Premium Affirmative action Discrimination