"You’re not going." Just like that‚ they struck a deal. Of course‚ only one of them were aware of the deal and its terms: one man would enforce his will‚ and the other would cave. "I’m sorry‚ I don’t want trouble‚" Solomon said in an apologetic‚ non-threatening tone. "I just want to pass through and get home peacefully. I’m not bothering anyone." Solomon’s hands were raised shoulder height with his palms facing the man in front of him‚ the universal sign for "I give up." It was true‚ he really
Premium Contract Contract law Contractual term
Agency refers to a consensual bilateral agreement whereby one party‚ the principal authorizes another‚ the agent‚ to exercise decisions on his behalf‚ usually with a third party involved. In this particular case Duncan is deemed to be the principal‚ Fred the agent and the plumber the third party. There are many rules when it comes to the creation of an agency contract‚ mainly the principal must be in existence during time of agreement and he must also know and authorize the agreement. If an agent
Premium Contract Contract law Contractual term
Delays of the project may lead the employer to suffer in hardship‚ expense‚ or loss of revenue. Thus‚ the employer may claim against the contractor a delay to the works or a defect in the works. In this case‚ when delays occur‚ the employer may have the right to claim the LAD to recover his losses such as the loss of income‚ the cost of alternate facilities‚ increased financing cost‚ extended overhead costs‚ and loss profits. Normally these claims would make under the LAD clause to reimbursement
Premium Contract Tort Breach of contract
CHCCS400C – Work within a relevant legal and ethical framework: Assignment 1 What you have to do Students need to complete three (3) tasks: Task A: Complete ten (10) short answer questions based on the learning materials. Task B: Case study. Complete eleven (11) short answer questions. Task C: Complete six (6) short answer questions based on the learning material. Task A Students need to answer the following questions: 1. Why is it important for a worker in the Community Services Industry to
Premium Contract Contract law Law
What are warranties Warranties are different to the automatic consumer guarantees‚ warranties are not compulsory‚ they are the voluntary promise made by the person or business who sold the consumer the goods or services. Once the consumer buys the product or service‚ the promise becomes a right that can be enforced under the Australian Consumer Law. The warranty can be expressed via different ways‚ it can be presented verbally or in writing. These extra promises are about the quality or standard
Premium Contract Management Law
Respondent‚ GAIL MATSUSHIMA (“MATSUSHIMA/RESPONDENT”)‚ submits this Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of her request to enforce the Memorandum of Agreement (“Agreement”) between herself and STEPHEN ROSS (“ROSS/PETITIONER”). The facts and evidence cited herein will demonstrate that it would be procedurally proper to enter a Judgment in this case under Code of Civil Procedure 664.6 by way of the agreement reached at the parties’ informal Settlement Meeting on October 1‚ 2014. I. INTRODUCTION
Premium Contract Law Contract law
FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Section 958-605-25 requires that not-for-profits wait to recognize a contribution until they are satisfied that the likelihood is remote that the conditions that accompany the contribution will not be met (Tysiac‚ 2017). According to FASB ASC 958-605-8‚ pursuant to paragraph 958-605-25-2‚ an unconditional promise to give shall be recognized when it is received. There must be satisfactory confirmation that a promise was made and received in the form
Premium Contract Contract law Contractual term
No Contribution Required Of Excess Insurer Where It Did Not Consent To Settlement In February‚ the California Court of Appeal ruled in Doe Run Resources Corp v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York that an excess insurer did not have to contribute to the settlement where the insured failed to obtain its consent before signing the settlement agreement. The case involved a complaint filed in 2001 by residents of Herculaneum‚ Missouri alleging that the defendant mining-company‚ Doe Run’s‚ lead and
Premium Contract Supreme Court of the United States Law
Finally‚ on July 27‚ 2000‚ Marie Villette (plaintiff) had a carport installed from Sheldorado Aluminum Product (defendant). The covering would collapse six months later on top of the plaintiffs Mercedes Benz. All the plaintiff is requesting is the $3‚000 she has spent on the carport. Ms. Villette filed a lawsuit opposing Sheldorado expecting the return of her $3000. Ms. Villette and Sheldorado‚ had no formal written contract‚ however‚ there was a bill of sale; it is dated 11 July‚ 2000. Ms. Villette
Premium Contract Law Contract law
Facts of the Case CoAx and CableCo have entered into a binding written agreement for CableCo to buy 1‚000 feet of coaxial cable for $3 per foot. However‚ CableCo is building a new warehouse‚ so they currently don’t have anywhere to store the cable. They have asked CoAx to store the cable in their warehouse until CableCo’s warehouse is completed in three months. CoAx agrees to do so. They store the cable in spools holding 10‚000 feet of cable‚ which are considered finished goods ready to be shipped
Premium Contract Contract law Contractual term