Metropolitan Trial Court‚ Municipal Trial Court Quasi Judicial Bodies 1. 1. Comelec 2. 2. NLRC 3. 3. LTFRC 4. 4. ERB Quantum of Evidence Criminal cases: Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt Civil cases: Preponderance of Evidencegreater weight of all the evidence which as a whole shows that the act sought to be proved is more probable than not. Administrative cases: Substantial Evidence – Such evidence that a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion Effects and Applications of law
Premium Contract
isn’t going to end well. Additionally‚ the FBI and the Computer Security Institute‚ in their annual survey on computer crime and information security‚ gathered the following disturbing facts in 1998: 1) 64 percent of respondents reported a security breach in 1998 — up 16 percent from the previous year; 2) security breaches cost the respondents who could quantify losses a total of $136‚822‚000 — up 35 percent over the previous year; 3) 18 percent of respondents had no idea whether or not they had been
Premium Computer security Computer Security
Contract Creation and Management Simulation LAW/531 In the contract creation and management simulation involving Span Systems and Citizen-Schwarz AG (C-S) the conflict involved and possible resolutions could be beneficial or catastrophic for both companies. Legal risks for corporations in the process of implementation and development of a program are many. To prevent this there must be direct‚ quantifiable benchmarks that are acknowledged by all parties involved. Any contract ambiguity that
Premium Contract Negotiation
of Contents Introduction 1 Contracts in Restraint of Trade 1 Case 1: Wrigglesworth v. Wilson Anthony 4 Case 2: Svenson Hair Center Sdn Bhd v. Irene Chin Zee Ling 6 Case 3: Shanghai Hall Ltd v. Town House Hotel Ltd 8 Case 4: Polygram Records Sdn Bhd v. Hillary Ang & Ors & Anor 10 Case 5: Pertama Cabaret Nite Club Sdn. Bhd. v. Roman Tam 12 Case 6: Nagadevan Mahalingam v. Millennium Medicare Services 14 Case 7: Thomas Cowan & Co Ltd v. Orme 16 Case 8: Schmidt Scientific Sdn Bhd
Premium Contract Contract law
into contract. Most people believe that minors’ are considered incompetent. It is said that if a person does not have the mental capacity to understand a that a contract is being made or the general nature of the contract‚ the person lacks contractual capacity. So then why would someone enter a contract with one. That is why I would have to say the first advantage is that most minors’ which means anyone under the age of 18‚ are allowed to enter into contracts. However‚ minors’ contracts are
Premium Contract Contract law Common law
ASPECTS OF CONTRACT AND NEGLIGENCE OF BUSINESS Task: 1.1: Explain the importance of the essential elements required for the information of a valid contract? Offer A valid offer identifies the bargained-for exchange between the parties and creates a power of acceptance in the party to whom the offer is made. The communication by one party known as the offeror to the another party called the offeree b) Acceptance To constitute a contract‚ there must be an acceptance of the offer
Premium Contract
Contracts Review Common law majority Rule UCC Article 1 & 2 (transaction in goods)- usually same as majority common law except in a few areas Significant minority rules- will be on test and are there to fool you. DO NOT CHOOSE! 34 Contracts MCQ * 60% Offer and Acceptance (6-8 Qs)‚ Conditions (6-8Qs) and Remedies- UCC and Common law (6-8 Qs) * 40% - 1-2Qs on the following areas * Consideration * 3rd party beneficiaries * Assignments and delegations * Statute
Premium Contract Contract law
CIPD Factsheet The psychological contract Revised July 2011 ------------------------------------------------- What is the psychological contract? The term ’psychological contract ’ was first used in the early 1960s but became more popular following the economic downturn in the early 1990s. It has been defined as ’…the perceptions of the two parties‚ employee and employer‚ of what their mutual obligations are towards each other ’1. These obligations will often be informal and imprecise:
Premium Employment Management
Carlill v. The Carbolic Smoke Ball Company. The case of Carlill v. The Carbolic Smoke Ball Company‚ centred around an advertisement which was placed in the Pall Mall Gazette on November 13‚ 1891. The advertisement was entered by The Carbolic Smoke Ball Company and was promoting a “medical preparation”1 which the company had developed‚ called the Carbolic Smoke Ball. The advertisement clamed that “During the last epidemic of influenza many thousand carbolic smoke balls were sold as preventatives
Premium Contract Invitation to treat Offer and acceptance
WRITTEN CONTRACTS 1 Written Contracts Javier Garza Grantham University WRITTEN CONTRACTS 2 Written Contracts Paula orally agrees to work with Next Corporation in New York City for two years. Paula moves her family and begins work. Three months later‚ Paula is fired for no stated cause. She sues for reinstatement or pay. Next Corporation argues that there is no written contract between them. What will the court say? Oral contracts are as
Premium Contract Contract law Gentlemen's agreement