Facts: Precise Engineering Corporation has a contract with Quik Mart Stores to provide customized software for Quik’s inventory control system. Retail Outlets‚ Inc‚ Quik’s competitor‚ induces Sam‚ a Precise subcontractor who is writing code for the Quik software‚ to delay delivery of the code for one week. As a result‚ Precise’s delivery of the software is delayed‚ and Quik sustains $500‚000 in lost profits. Issue: Whether Retail Outlets willfully interfered with a contractual relationship
Premium Contract Jurisdiction Breach of contract
Backgrounds& some basic facts Contracts are a voluntary arrangement involving two or more parties which is enforced by law as a binding agreement‚ which is one of the cornerstones of our economic environment from early stage to the modern society. Several essential conditions constitute the process of forming a standard contract. In our present case‚ three parties were involved in relation of transaction. The seller is The Logomug‚ which manufacturing and selling mugs. One buyer is Sophie and another
Premium Contract Contract law Contractual term
Little Lamb Company needs an additional programmer for a special project. The company enters into a contract with Mary to complete this project. Just as the project is nearing completion‚ a new need arises for her services. She is asked to continue with the company to complete the new project. While completing the new project‚ the supervisor begins working more closely with Mary and requires her to use company materials and equipment while adhering to company work schedules. After two years‚ economic
Premium Contract Employment Contract law
Student: Matthew Way Case Study: Phillip Eugene Wendling‚ Appellee‚ v. Ted Puls and George Watson‚ Defendants-Appellants No. 50‚522 UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS 227 Kan. 780; 610 P. 2d 580; 1980 Kan. LEXIS 280; 28 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (Callaghan) 1362 May 10‚ 1980‚ Opinion Filed The Procedural History: Phillip Eugene Wendling‚ a Harvey County farmer and stockman‚ told Ted Puls‚ an active cattle buyer‚ in July of 1973 that he might have some cattle for sale around the middle of that
Premium Contract Supreme Court of the United States Court
strong coagulative power‚ in other words‚ there is no discrimination in Apple‚ further its products are creative and progressive‚ it is in a position to correctly handle his patent‚ copyright and trademark from infringing; Apple almost never breach of contract‚ it has well-deserved reputation‚ so its customers and suppliers are larger than over before; Apple is a complex of emotional and rational‚ it properly deal with the relationship between morality and law‚ neither immoral nor illegal.
Premium Contract Breach of contract Law
Find (Cntl-F) Best Paper Index Table of Contents RECRUITMENT POLICY VS. RECRUITMENT PROCESS: ESPOUSED THEORY AND THEORY-IN-USE ANNA M. STAFSUDD Department of Business Administration Lund University P.O. Box 7080 SE-220 07 Lund Sweden INTRODUCTION This paper argues that recruitment policy does not influence the recruitment process to a large extent‚ as it represents an espoused theory‚ which is used to explain and idealize behavior after it has occurred. Instead‚ it is argued that recruitment
Premium Control system Control engineering Feedback
the date specified in the memorandum. Consignee Castillo refused to take delivery of the goods on account of its failure to arrive on time‚ and filed an action for rescission of contract with damages against Maersk Line and Eli Lilly alleging gross negligence and undue delay. Denying that it committed breach of contract‚ petitioner alleged in its answer that the subject shipment was transported in accordance with the provisions of the NCC covering bill of lading and that its liability under the
Premium Contract law Transport Legal documents
for breach of contract. She stated‚ “Everything we did and purchased‚ whether it be a vacuum cleaner or a car‚ was together as husband and wife. It was just something we agreed on‚ that is how we were going to do it.” Issue: Was there a contract between the two parties Elsten and Cook? Is the contract enforceable? Did Donald Cook breach the contract between the two parties? Decision: Yes‚ the two parties did have an agreement. There agreement led them to an implied-in-fact contract. The
Premium Marriage Contract Contract law
ligation against NoBugs for breach of contract Sterling have a case. Both sides has agreed to enter into a pact‚ on mutually beneficial business terms‚ where NoBugs are responsible for providing high quality microchips without defects‚ and Sterling would help NoBugs in achieving high business growth. For a breach of contract you must have two things in your favor. Caused damages in the form of currency compensations necessitating that you have lost money because of the breach. Then‚ you need material
Premium Contract Civil procedure Lawsuit
Jeremy. The contract between Widgets plc and Crankit is a contract for service‚ under the SGSA 1982; this means that it applies to contracts for work and materials‚ also if the service done was careless. a) When carrying out the first annual service‚ Crankit fits a new fuel pump. This malfunctions 24 hours later‚ causing an explosion. Injuries result to Jeremy‚ who lives next door to the factory and the explosion also causes business interruption for 3 weeks. Contract of works and
Premium Contract Breach of contract Contract law