Obviously‚ there was a significant reduction in direct labor within these two years when there was no obvious change in overhead costs. According to the case‚ the decision to outsource Muffler-exhaust systems and oil pans was based on the model without overhead allocation. Overlooking the overhead allocation represented a nightmare in analysis and led Bridgeton face falling profits. To further explore the problems‚ we allocate overhead costs into each products for getting the true profits and the ROS:
Premium Outsourcing
Bridgeton Industries: Automotive Component and Fabrication Plant 3. Calculate the expected gross margins as a percentage of selling price on each product based on the 1998 and 1990 model year budgets assuming selling price and material and labor cost do not change from standard. *See Exhibit 1 for calculations To calculate the expected gross margins as a percentage of selling price‚ first we will need to calculate the total overhead (burden) for years 1988 and 1990. For year 1988‚ the total
Premium Marketing Cost Mathematics
Bridgeton Industries: Automotive Component & Fabrication Plant DESCRIPTION. The Automotive Component & Fabrication Plant (ACF) was a major supplier of components for the domestic automotive industry‚ the original plant site for Bridgeton Industries. ACF was a long-term business since the early 1900s. The market of ACT’s production was growing and dominated by U.S. automobile manufacturers‚ ACF faced less competition pressure because most competitions from local suppliers and other Bridgeton plants
Premium Cost Costs Economics
TOPICS IN MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING AMIS 4310 CASE QUESTIONS Seligram‚ Inc.: Electronic Testing Operations 1. What caused the existing system at ETO to fail? 2. Calculate the reported cost of the five components listed in Exhibit 6 using: a. The existing system. b. The system proposed by the accounting manager. c. The system proposed by the consultant. 3. Which system is preferable? Why? 4. Would you recommend any changes to the system you prefer? Why? 5. Would you
Premium Cost accounting Net present value Internal rate of return
Bridgeton Industries: Automotive Component & Fabrication Plant The Automotive Component and Fabrication Plant (ACF) was the original plant site for Bridgeton Industries‚ a major supplier of components for the domestic automotive industry. It manufactured fuel tanks‚ manifolds‚ doors‚ muffler/exhausts and oil pans. All its products were sold to Big Three domestic automobile manufactures. Competition was from local suppliers and other Bridgeton plants. The plant well grew and developed as far as
Premium Costs
To: Bridgeton Management The ACF plant had cutbacks throughout the 80s as a result of stiff competition caused by foreign competitors entering a market that was dominated by the US auto parts suppliers. As a result of declining market share‚ ACF is not only in competition with other suppliers but also other Bridgeton plants. The gross profit is declining due to increased costs in direct labor and direct material since 1987. Direct materials cost increased due to the high cost of steel in producing
Premium Manufacturing Economics Ford Motor Company
University of Toronto (St. George) 4 Course Materials & Tools ECO 204 (2nd Draft) Book Chapters Posted on 204 website on a continuous basis (Link to 1st Draft) Harvard Business School (HBS) Cases Purchasable here (register as a student) Cases: Prestige Telephone Company‚ Nutrasweet‚ Aluminum Industry (data set‚ pw: quasifixed) ECO 204 Excel (2007) Model Posted on 204 website on a continuous basis Add-in “Data Analysis” and “Solver” tools (instructions) Ajaz Hussain. Department of Economics.
Premium Optimization Supply and demand Inverse demand function
|SUBJECT: |Bridgeton Industries Case Study | |TO: | | |FROM: | | |DATE: |
Premium Costs Variable cost Cost
PMBA Response to “The Case of the Unidentified Industries – 2006” INTRODUCTION: “The Case of the Unidentified Industries” challenges the reader to match 14 firms operating in 14 different industries with 14 sets of financial data from the year ending in 2005. This section aims to enlighten the reader about the methodology used to derive the responses shown in the subsequent section. First‚ the industries are placed in one of the following groups: service industry‚ manufacturing‚ and retail
Premium Balance sheet Retailing Asset
Golf Industry 2009 Case Analysis Michael George Central Michigan University MGT 495 Section #2216221 Table of Content 1.Introduction page 1 2.Five Forces of Competition pages 1-4 3.Driving Forces page 4 4.Strategic Map page 5 5.Conclusion page 5 6.Biography page 6 1 Introduction In this case study we look at the golf equipment industry in 2009 and its driving forces that affect the competition amongst its leaders. The companies examined in the study are Callaway Golf‚
Premium Golf Golf club Golf ball