The British Imperialism had a positive impact on India. When they had conquered India in 1858‚ India was not subjected to the influences of the western world‚ except for trade with the Greeks. THey ruled through the East India Company. The British did not do much for Indian Economy. In fact‚ taxes were raised and famine was the aftereffects of it. In the earth 19th century‚ the British encouraged agriculture‚ which decreased nomads and pastors. The British took up a logging operation that made most
Free British Empire
early years in England. They were influenced by British thought‚ British ideas‚ that is why our leaders were always telling the British "How can you do these things? They’re against your own basic values.". We had no hatred‚ in fact it was the other way round - it was their values that made us revolt." <br>-Aruna Asaf Ali‚ a leader of the Indian National Congress. <br>(Masani‚ quoted in Wood‚ 32‚ 1989) <br> <br>There is no doubt that British imperialism had a large impact on India. India‚ having previously
Premium
Were Economic Factors Primarily Responsible for Nineteenth-Century British Imperialism? In society today the almighty dollar is what motivates most people’s actions. However‚ there are other reasons that can promote a change within a system such as morals‚ religious beliefs‚ values‚ and ethics. During the nineteenth century‚ society was not much different from that of the present day as the economy remains one of the most important parts of the country. This is evident in the time period
Premium United States British Empire United Kingdom
China were heavily affected by British imperialism. However‚ the British exerted their control differently in each country. While India was placed under direct British rule‚ with the Queen as its ruler‚ in China‚ the European nations controlled various regions through the concept of "spheres of influence‚" allowing exclusive trading privileges with countries such as Britain‚ France‚ Germany‚ Russia‚ and Japan. Unlike the rule in India‚ it did not involve direct British control. In India the things
Premium
house and take ownership of it‚ dictating how day-to-day operations should work further on‚ with no prior knowledge of the previous dynamic? It sounds like an absurd concept‚ but this is exactly what the Europeans did during the era of imperialism. The Scramble for Africa was a competition featuring the major European powers in a race to see who could conquer the most land and extract the best resources from the continent. Africans and Native Americans witnessed firsthand the effects of European involvement
Premium Africa Colonialism Europe
What was the driving force behind European Imperialism in Africa? Make a claim based on evidence SOURCING : Who‚ What‚ When‚ Where & Why is this from? CONTEXTUALIZING : What are the effects of time/circumstances on author? CLOSE READING : What is the claim/evidence? CORROBORATING : Validity and comparison to other documents? Part I CONTEXTUALIZATION (All Documents) (Using the timeline‚ powerpoint‚ map‚ textbook‚ and introduction to each document answer these questions)
Premium Document
Within the information presented in this course there have been many similarities and differences noted about the French and British rule in western Africa. Because the authoritative forces were of two completely different countries‚ each had their own ideas and concerns for the African nations. It is known‚ the French ruled with a kind of direct force‚ whereas the British ruled with an indirect notion. Though the two separate countries differed in their strategies‚ they each had the aspiration for
Premium Atlantic slave trade Slavery
King Abdullah of Jordan and Nasser of Egypt both responded to British influence and colonialism by creating a nation‚ separate from Britain‚ that run on the same western and modernized principles with the hope of creating a reputation for themselves as a nation equal to Britain and other western nations. The British presence and control in Egypt caused Nasser to oust this foreign presence in attempt to create his own Egyptian nation‚ run only by the people of Egypt. Similarly‚ King Abdullah‚ after
Premium Egypt Israel British Empire
Other Gujaratis who migrated out of what is now the state of Gujarat during the British Raj to British East Africa (Kenya and Uganda) sometimes adopted the surname ’Patel’‚ and this surname was then subsequently passed onto their descendants (who now mainly reside outside Kenya and Uganda). Also‚ during the British Raj‚ some ’Patels’ who migrated to British East Africa and the Union of South Africa (South Africa) adopted different surnames‚ usually the name of their village‚ their trade or even
Premium Gujarat Surnames
The Prosperous Kingdoms of Africa Although many may think otherwise‚ but Africans are not barbarians. This stereotype was developed by Europeans during the Age of Imperialism. African kingdoms were some of the wealthiest empires known at their time. Most of these empires dominated gold and salt mines. Also‚ they relied heavily on trade with Arabs and Indians. The kingdoms of Mali‚ Ghana‚ and the Eastern city states‚ were some of the most powerful kingdoms during their reign. One could tell
Premium Africa Mali Empire West Africa