341 AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION v RICH and Others 5 SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — EQUITY DIVISION AUSTIN J 10 1‚ 18 November 2002‚ 24 February 2003 — Sydney [2003] NSWSC 85 15 20 25 30 Directors — Duties — Non-executive chairman of directors — Statutory duty of care — Responsibilities — Usual practice of chairmen of listed Australian companies — Duty to keep informed — (CTH) Corporations Act 2001 s 180(1)(b). Words and phrases — “responsibilities within the corporation”
Premium Board of directors Corporate governance
PROBLEMS OF GENDER IDENTITY 1 The Ontario Human Rights Commission defines gender identity as the “link to a person’s sense of self‚ and the sense of being male or female that is socially constructed and reinforced by puberty.” Gender identity is a very broad social issue in the world today that manifests itself in the society in different ways. The society functions on a system that depends on each gender and its attributed sexual orientation‚ usually heterosexual males and females‚ to play the
Premium Gender Male Female
The Functions of the Labour Relations Commission in Ireland. · To provide a conciliation service. Conciliation is a procedure by which parties in dispute can meet to sort out their difficulties with the help of a third party · To offer guidance on codes of practice but only after consultation with union and employer organisations such as ICTU and IBEC. The codes of practice are not enforceable‚ but they can be taken into account by an equality officer or a rights commissioner in deciding
Premium Law Appeal Trade union
|SECTION: |EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1‚ 2006 | |SUBJECT: |PAGE 1 of 8 | |Proactive Risk Assessment Policy | | Scope: This policy applies to all direct and indirect
Premium Risk management Risk assessment Assessment
| UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington‚ D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Quarterly Period Ended October 27‚ 2012 OR o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file no. 333-133184-12 Neiman Marcus‚ Inc. (Exact name of
Premium Balance sheet Asset Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Healey (No 2) [2011] FCA 1003 Citation: | Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Healey (No 2) [2011] FCA 1003 | | | Parties: | AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION v BRIAN HEALEY‚ ANDREW THOMAS SCOTT‚ SAMUEL KAVOURAKIS‚ JAMES WILLIAM HALL‚ PAUL ASHLEY COOPER‚ PETER GRAHAM GOLDIE‚ LOUIS PETER WILKINSON and ROMANO GEORGE NENNA | | | File number: | VID 750 of 2009 | | | Judge:
Premium Law United States Jury
Communications Commission vs. Fox Television Stations Inc.‚ I will discuss the background and the role of the FCC in the United States‚ the history of Fox Television Stations Inc. and analyze the arguments of both sides. Based on those arguments I will answer the question did the Supreme Court get it right on the decision of this case. “The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was created when Congress passed the Communications Act in 1934 which abolished the Federal Radio Commission and transferred
Premium United States United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Kiersten Foster AP Government & Politics December 8‚ 2013 Mr. Raveret Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission: First amendment rights or the government ’s cold shoulder to corporations? With the bitter wounds of British tyranny still stinging‚ the Founding Fathers thought up the first amendment. Democracy flourishes only when freedoms to express views‚ both political and those of other concerns‚ are guaranteed. What happens‚ however‚ when your own government
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States United States Constitution
Share Jesus Without Fear (1999). McRaney‚ The Art of Personal Evangelism (2003). Pipes & Lee‚ Family to Family (1999). Reid & Wheeler‚ Servant Evangelism Manual (2013). Spread Truth Ministries‚ The Story (2011). Whaley & Wheeler‚ The Great Commission to Worship (2011). Whaley & Wheeler‚ Worship and Witness Workbook (2012). Module/Week Reading & Study Assignments Points 1 Earley & Wheeler: Preface‚ chs. 1–5‚ 28‚ 30 McRaney: ch. 1 Whaley & Wheeler (2011): chs. 1–5 6 presentations Listening Guide
Premium Harshad number Final examination The Final
“Compare and Contrast two criminological approaches to understanding the commission of crime.” Criminologists seek to understand the commission of crime in a given society‚ attempting to figure out why certain crimes occur‚ and then to study how these can be prevented‚ and deterred by individuals. The two key approaches I will examine in this assignment is that of the early ’Classicalist’ approach‚ and the opposing ’Positivist’ approach‚ each of which are crucial for understanding modern criminology
Premium Crime Criminology