This document of BUS 640 Week 4 Discussion Question 1 Strategic Behavior Oligopolies includes: An interesting example of strategic behavior comes from a 1997 article about Microsoft’s investment in Apple (New Straits Times‚ 1997). The article is included in the Required Readings list. Facing tough anti-trust scrutiny from government agencies‚ Microsoft provided financial support to Apple in order to ensure Apple’s survival and‚ therefore‚ to ensure that competitiveness in the industry remains
Premium Microsoft Operating system Macintosh
MANAGEMENT SUBJECT; BUSINESS LAW LECTURER; MR MWAKAJINGA TYPE OF ASSIGNMENT: INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT DATE OF SUBMISSION; 09 DECEMBER 2013 NAME: URASSA FAITH BHRM/T.2012/20 Question: Choose any legal source of law in Tanzania and explain its relevance to Tanzania development According to Carl F.Stydvin and Linda Mulcahy [2007}Law is the set of rules that governs a society and create a structure of authority or government to run the social order. Law is binding on the person
Premium Law Common law
Business Law Introduction A business consists of trade of any profession or vocation. Business law looks at the formation of the business and the contracts plus legislations within it. The body of a business has rules and regulations that business law enforces enabling it to govern the transactions between business entities. In relation to that is commercial law. Marketing‚ Bankruptcy‚ contracts and trade in general are all under commercial law. In this assignment I will be assessing that
Premium Contract
Introduction: E&Z Electronics is a retailer which purchases L&G products in bulk and then sells them to customers. Recently a customer‚ El. Hajji Mohammed bought an L&G washing machine from E&Z electronics who later on suffered legally recognizable damages. The washing machine resulted in not only injuring Mohammed but also causing destructive damages to his home. The issue here is‚ could the court hold both L&G electronics and E&Z electronics liable for the damages caused to
Premium Tort Negligence Implied warranty
CAS GUIDE 2013/2014 CAS coordinator contact: Jakub Lorenc Mail: kubalorenc@gmail.com “think globally‚ act locally” Contents: Introduction.................................................................................... p. 4 What does CAS mean?................................................................. p. 4 Aims of CAS. ............................
Premium Reflection Activity
Research Paper: The law laid down in Soloman v. Soloman and Co. is often considered the source on the basis of which the jurisprudence of corporate personality has been written world over. However‚ the history of corporate-commercial litigation has witnessed situations where in the Courts have gone beyond the corporate cloak and analyzed the working and the motives of the members or directors of the company: In doing the same‚ the Courts have evolved the concept of lifting or piercing the
Premium Corporation Company
BUS 360 Assignment Submitted by Md. Anisul Islam‚ Id-1010025 01. 02. No‚ There is no quasi-contract here. Here is a contract of specific performance. 03. No‚ Klick-Lewis did not want to make a legal offer because it refused to give the car as prize & also neglected to remove the car & the sign before Cobaugh’s play in the tournament. 04. 05. 06. No‚ Madaio did not effectively accept the offer before McCarthy withdrew it. Because Madaio signed the contract but did not mailed or informed
Premium Contract Contract law
Curtin Business School School of Business Law and Taxation Unit Outline 11011 Business Law 100 Semester 1‚ 2013 Unit study package number: Mode of study: Tuition pattern summary: Credit Value: Pre-requisite units: Co-requisite units: Anti-requisite units: Result type: Approved incidental fees: Unit coordinator: 11011 Internal Seminar: 1 x 3 Hours Weekly This unit does not have a fieldwork component. 25.0 Nil Nil Nil Grade/Mark Information about approved incidental fees can be obtained from our
Premium Law Common law Business
Executive Summary Various issues in the common law arise when agents make contracts on behalf of principals. Should a principal be bound when his agent makes a contract on his behalf that he would immediately wish to disavow? The tradeoffs resemble those in tort‚ so the least-cost avoider principle is useful for deciding which agreements are binding and can unify a number of different doctrines in agency law. In particular‚ an efficiency explanation can be found for the undisclosed-principal rule
Premium Contract
Part A Question 1 Step 1 Identify the legal issue The legal issue is whether the element of agreement requires the formation of a valid contract. Step 2 Explain the principles of law relevant to that issue with reference to authority (cases and/or legislation) The element of an agreement is one of the three elements of a contract intention to be legally bound either in formal execution in a deed; or consideration. Agreements means a meeting of the minds on at least those essential
Premium Contract